diff --git a/agents/rio/learnings.md b/agents/rio/learnings.md
index a749f9f8..5d8854e5 100644
--- a/agents/rio/learnings.md
+++ b/agents/rio/learnings.md
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@
 Working memory for Telegram conversations. Read every response, self-written after significant corrections. Periodically audited by Leo. Corrections graduate to KB (entity updates, claims) when verified.
 
 ## Communication Notes
+- [2026-03-30] When I can't see full tweet content, say so immediately. Don't reconstruct from fragments. This is the third time this pattern has come up.
 - [2026-03-25] When users ask for a token price, check live market data tools first before saying you don't have it. The $ prefix or token name should both trigger a lookup attempt.
 - [2026-03-24] When asked about recent X activity, be explicit about whether the response comes from live search results or cached KB data. Don't present KB-sourced info as if it's a real-time summary.
 - [2026-03-23] When you can't access a linked tweet's content, say so upfront instead of guessing. Getting caught fabricating a response is worse than admitting you can't see the link.
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-proph3t-s-full-post-on-p2p-founder-polymarket-conf.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-proph3t-s-full-post-on-p2p-founder-polymarket-conf.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..e7554750
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-source-m3taversal-proph3t-s-full-post-on-p2p-founder-polymarket-conf.md
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+type: source
+source_type: telegram-contribution
+title: "Source from @m3taversal — Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's"
+author: "@m3taversal"
+date: 2026-03-30
+domain: internet-finance
+format: contribution
+status: unprocessed
+proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
+contribution_type: source-submission
+tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'ownership-coins', 'governance']
+---
+
+# Source: Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's response. From @met
+
+Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
+Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
+
+## Verbatim User Message
+
+we should always be up front about that. Here is is: https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268
+
+## Rio's Context
+
+Proph3t's full post on P2P founder Polymarket conflict of interest and MetaDAO's response. From @metaproph3t on X (2025-07-13): "To address the obvious... Two weeks ago, the founder of P2P placed a bet on Polymarket that P2P would reach $6M of commits in its ICO. Over the last 48 hours, many people have tweeted about this. Here are some of these tweets: I wanted to take the time to talk about how we're thinking about this and what we're doing. 1: Had we known about this, we would have pushed that they not participate in these markets. Ever since they started, these prediction markets have been a source of consternation for us. We've asked Poly..." URL: https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268