extract: 2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management
Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2edcff6532
commit
33fe5f2f3b
5 changed files with 69 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -77,6 +77,12 @@ Autocrat v0.1 made the three-day window configurable rather than hardcoded, with
|
|||
|
||||
Proposal #3 on MetaDAO (account EXehk1u3qUJZSxJ4X3nHsiTocRhzwq3eQAa6WKxeJ8Xs) ran on Autocrat version 0.3, created 2024-07-04, and completed/ended 2024-07-08 - confirming the four-day operational window (proposal creation plus three-day settlement period) specified in the mechanism design.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
Dean's List DAO treasury management proposal used the standard three-day TWAP settlement window, requiring >3% price improvement ($515,000 vs $500,000 base FDV) for passage. The proposal passed on 2024-12-05, demonstrating the mechanism in production use for treasury management decisions.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -52,6 +52,12 @@ Dean's List ThailandDAO proposal included complex mechanics (token lockup multip
|
|||
|
||||
MetaDAO's Q3 roadmap explicitly prioritized UI performance improvements, targeting reduction of page load times from 14.6 seconds to 1 second. This 93% reduction target indicates that user experience friction was severe enough to warrant top-level roadmap inclusion alongside product launches and team building.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
Dean's List DAO successfully passed a treasury management proposal through futarchy despite the proposal requiring stakeholders to understand probability modeling, FDV calculations, and TWAP mechanics. The proposal included detailed financial analysis with confidence intervals and survival probability estimates, suggesting that complexity may not be a fatal barrier when the decision has clear financial stakes.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ The risk is that cultural proposals introduce systematic bias: participants who
|
|||
|
||||
The single data point is limited. One passed proposal doesn't establish a reliable pattern. Cultural proposals that fail futarchy governance (and thus go unobserved in public records) would provide the necessary counter-evidence to calibrate how often futarchy actually validates cultural versus financial spending.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
|
||||
|
||||
Dean's List DAO's treasury de-risking proposal demonstrates futarchy pricing operational risk management, not just cultural spending. The market priced the expected FDV impact of converting volatile assets to stablecoins, treating financial stability as a measurable input to token price. This extends futarchy's demonstrated scope from community/brand decisions to financial risk management.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|||
{
|
||||
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"no_frontmatter"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"filename": "treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md",
|
||||
"issues": [
|
||||
"no_frontmatter"
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"validation_stats": {
|
||||
"total": 2,
|
||||
"kept": 0,
|
||||
"fixed": 6,
|
||||
"rejected": 2,
|
||||
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||
"treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate gov",
|
||||
"treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md:stripped_wiki_link:ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through",
|
||||
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:set_created:2026-03-15",
|
||||
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-tr",
|
||||
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:stripped_wiki_link:coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futar"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"rejections": [
|
||||
"treasury-stablecoin-conversion-increases-dao-survival-probability-through-volatility-elimination.md:no_frontmatter",
|
||||
"treasury-de-risking-increases-dao-fdv-through-market-confidence-signal.md:no_frontmatter"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||
"date": "2026-03-15"
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/4gaJ8bi1gpNEx6xSSsepjVBM6GXqTDfLbiUbzXbARHW
|
|||
date: 2024-12-02
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-15
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md", "futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -122,3 +126,13 @@ This strategy ensures financial stability while signaling prudence to investors,
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-12-05
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-12-05
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Dean's List DAO treasury valued at $75,000-$87,000 at $350 SOL (excluding DEAN tokens) as of December 2024
|
||||
- Dean's List DAO base FDV estimated at $500,000 for proposal duration
|
||||
- Proposal required TWAP > 3% ($515,000 minimum) to pass
|
||||
- Proposal account: 4gaJ8bi1gpNEx6xSSsepjVBM6GXqTDfLbiUbzXbARHW1
|
||||
- DAO account: 9TKh2yav4WpSNkFV2cLybrWZETBWZBkQ6WB6qV9Nt9dJ
|
||||
- Proposal completed and passed on 2024-12-05
|
||||
- Autocrat version 0.3 used for governance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue