From 37201829ad7e7ec89025e9aecf6ec4dcd9098d91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2026 19:18:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] extract: 2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede --- ...k-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md | 6 ++++++ ...ion-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md | 6 ++++++ ...osal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md | 15 ++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md index 7b18344b..28372a5d 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md @@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ From the MetaDAO proposal: This claim extends futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility by showing the reputational concern operates at the mechanism level, not just the platform level. The market's rejection of Futardio suggests futarchy stakeholders prioritize mechanism credibility over short-term adoption metrics. + +### Additional Evidence (confirm) +*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-15* + +The futardio proposal explicitly acknowledged reputational risk: 'Makes futarchy look less serious' and 'May make it harder to sell DeFi DAOs / non-crypto organizations' and 'May make it harder to recruit contributors' were listed as potential pitfalls. The proposal ultimately failed, suggesting the market agreed these risks outweighed the adoption benefits. + --- Relevant Notes: diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md index 90aad624..ed61f77d 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md @@ -28,6 +28,12 @@ From the proposal: This claim complements [[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset futarchy]] by identifying the specific context where coin price is unambiguously correct: assets with no purpose beyond speculation. It also relates to [[redistribution proposals are futarchys hardest unsolved problem because they can increase measured welfare while reducing productive value creation]]—memecoins avoid this problem by having no productive value to begin with. + +### Additional Evidence (confirm) +*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-15* + +MetaDAO's futardio proposal explicitly identifies memecoins as ideal futarchy use case: 'memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.' The proposal was designed to test this thesis by creating a memecoin launchpad where each token gets a futarchy DAO. + --- Relevant Notes: diff --git a/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md b/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md index 715eabdd..a8c7e630 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md @@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/EmPUGgv2Utzuu2vgSu6GcTRAtJMox5vJeZKi95cBgfJ date: 2024-08-28 domain: internet-finance format: data -status: unprocessed +status: enrichment tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance] event_type: proposal +processed_by: rio +processed_date: 2026-03-15 +enrichments_applied: ["memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md", "futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md"] +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" --- ## Proposal Details @@ -352,3 +356,12 @@ This would all be left to the discretion of the team building it, but they would - Autocrat version: 0.3 - Completed: 2024-09-01 - Ended: 2024-09-01 + + +## Key Facts +- Futardio proposal EmPUGgv2Utzuu2vgSu6GcTRAtJMox5vJeZKi95cBgfJo failed on 2024-09-01 +- Proposal would have funded development with $100k grant paid over 6 months +- Target launch was Q3 2024 +- Nallok and Proph3t were named as supporters but not core team +- FUTA token would be distributed only to points owners and MetaDAO +- Points conversion period capped at 180 days maximum