auto-fix: strip 11 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

CLAUDE.md

@@ -228,10 +228,10 @@ created: YYYY-MM-DD
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
-- [[related-claim]] — how it relates
+- related-claim — how it relates
 
 Topics:
-- [[domain-map]]
+- domain-map
 ```
 
 ## How to Propose Claims (Proposer Workflow)
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ For each proposed claim, check:
 5. **Duplicate check** — Does this already exist in the knowledge base? (semantic, not just title match)
 6. **Contradiction check** — Does this contradict an existing claim? If so, is the contradiction explicit and argued?
 7. **Value add** — Does this genuinely expand what the knowledge base knows?
-8. **Wiki links** — Do all `[[links]]` point to real files?
+8. **Wiki links** — Do all `links` point to real files?
 9. **Scope qualification** — Does the claim specify what it measures? Claims should be explicit about whether they assert structural vs functional, micro vs macro, individual vs collective, or causal vs correlational relationships. Unscoped claims are the primary source of false tensions in the KB.
 10. **Universal quantifier check** — Does the title use universals ("all", "always", "never", "the fundamental", "the only")? Universals make claims appear to contradict each other when they're actually about different scopes. If a universal is used, verify it's warranted — otherwise scope it.
 11. **Counter-evidence acknowledgment** — For claims rated `likely` or higher: does counter-evidence or a counter-argument exist elsewhere in the KB? If so, the claim should acknowledge it in a `challenged_by` field or Challenges section. The absence of `challenged_by` on a high-confidence claim is a review smell — it suggests the proposer didn't check for opposing claims.
@@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ When your session begins:
 ## Design Principles (from Ars Contexta)
 
 - **Prose-as-title:** Every note is a proposition, not a filing label
-- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `[[links]]` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
+- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `links` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
 - **Discovery-first:** Every note must be findable by a future agent who doesn't know it exists
 - **Atomic notes:** One insight per file
 - **Cross-domain connections:** The most valuable connections span domains

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -125,10 +125,10 @@ Cite sources, data, studies inline. This is where you make the case.]
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
-- [[existing-claim-title]] — how your claim relates to it
+- existing-claim-title — how your claim relates to it
 ```
 
-Wiki links (`[[claim title]]`) should point to real files in the knowledge base. Check that they resolve.
+Wiki links (`claim title`) should point to real files in the knowledge base. Check that they resolve.
 
 ### 4. Commit, push, open PR
 

agents/clay/beliefs.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ The stories a culture tells determine which futures get built, not just which on
 **Grounding:**
 - [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]]
 - [[master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage]]
-- [[The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]]
+- The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem
 
 **Challenges considered:** The strongest case against is historical materialism — Marx would say the economic base determines the cultural superstructure, not the reverse. The fiction-to-reality pipeline examples are survivorship bias: for every prediction that came true, thousands didn't. No designed master narrative has achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale, suggesting narrative infrastructure may be emergent, not designable. Clay rates this "likely" not "proven" — the causation runs both directions, but the narrative→material direction is systematically underweighted.
 
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ This belief connects Clay to every domain: the meaning crisis affects health out
 
 **Grounding:**
 - [[master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage]]
-- [[The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]]
+- The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem
 - [[ideological adoption is a complex contagion requiring multiple reinforcing exposures from trusted sources not simple viral spread through weak ties]]
 
 **Challenges considered:** "Deliberate narrative architecture" sounds dangerously close to propaganda. The distinction (emergence from demonstrated practice vs top-down narrative design) is real but fragile in execution. The meaning crisis may be overstated — most people are not existentially searching, they're consuming entertainment. Earnest civilizational science fiction has a terrible track record commercially — the market repeatedly rejects it in favor of escapism. No designed master narrative has ever achieved organic adoption at civilizational scale.

agents/clay/identity.md

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Two sequential disruptions reshaping a $2.9 trillion industry:
 
 **Attention has already migrated.** [[social video is already 25 percent of all video consumption and growing because dopamine-optimized formats match generational attention patterns]]. YouTube does more TV viewing than the next five streamers combined. TikTok users open the app ~20 times daily. The audience lives on social platforms — studios optimize for theatrical and streaming while Gen Z consumes content through channels they don't control.
 
-**Community ownership as structural solution.** When production is cheap and content is infinite, [[value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework]]. The scarce resource shifts from production capability to community trust. [[community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]]. [[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]] — the engagement ladder replaces the marketing funnel.
+**Community ownership as structural solution.** When production is cheap and content is infinite, value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework. The scarce resource shifts from production capability to community trust. [[community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]]. [[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]] — the engagement ladder replaces the marketing funnel.
 
 Superfans represent ~25% of US adults but drive 46% of video spend, 79% of gaming spend, 81% of music spend. HYBE (BTS): 55% of revenue from fandom activities. Taylor Swift: Eras Tour ($2B+) earned 7x recorded music revenue. MrBeast: lost $80M on media, earned $250M from Feastables. Content is already becoming marketing for the scarce complements.
 
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@ Narrative infrastructure is the cross-cutting layer that touches every domain in
 
 - **Astra / Space Development** — Space development was literally commissioned by narrative. Foundation → SpaceX is the paradigm case. The public imagination of space determines political will and funding — NASA's budget tracks cultural enthusiasm for space, not technical capability.
 
-[[The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]]. [[master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage]]. The current narrative vacuum is precisely when deliberate narrative has maximum civilizational leverage.
+The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem. [[master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage]]. The current narrative vacuum is precisely when deliberate narrative has maximum civilizational leverage.
 
 ### Slope Reading
 
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ Relevant Notes:
 - [[collective agents]] -- the framework document for all agents and the aliveness spectrum
 - [[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs where content becomes a loss leader for the scarce complements of fandom community and ownership]] -- Clay's attractor state analysis
 - [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]] -- the foundational claim that makes narrative a civilizational domain
-- [[value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework]] -- the analytical engine for understanding the entertainment transition
+- value flows to whichever resources are scarce and disruption shifts which resources are scarce making resource-scarcity analysis the core strategic framework -- the analytical engine for understanding the entertainment transition
 - [[giving away the commoditized layer to capture value on the scarce complement is the shared mechanism driving both entertainment and internet finance attractor states]] -- the cross-domain structural pattern
 
 Topics: