diff --git a/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.json b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..58bec1dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.json
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "nuclear-governance-succeeded-through-physical-observability-not-political-will-making-the-template-inapplicable-to-ai.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    },
+    {
+      "filename": "ai-governance-mechanisms-regulating-physically-observable-inputs-are-structurally-more-durable-than-capability-evaluation.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 2,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 4,
+    "rejected": 2,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "nuclear-governance-succeeded-through-physical-observability-not-political-will-making-the-template-inapplicable-to-ai.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
+      "nuclear-governance-succeeded-through-physical-observability-not-political-will-making-the-template-inapplicable-to-ai.md:stripped_wiki_link:technology-advances-exponentially-but-coordination-mechanism",
+      "ai-governance-mechanisms-regulating-physically-observable-inputs-are-structurally-more-durable-than-capability-evaluation.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
+      "ai-governance-mechanisms-regulating-physically-observable-inputs-are-structurally-more-durable-than-capability-evaluation.md:stripped_wiki_link:technology-advances-exponentially-but-coordination-mechanism"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "nuclear-governance-succeeded-through-physical-observability-not-political-will-making-the-template-inapplicable-to-ai.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
+      "ai-governance-mechanisms-regulating-physically-observable-inputs-are-structurally-more-durable-than-capability-evaluation.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-20"
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.md
index 783f72f0..87228b36 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.md
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ date: 2026-03-20
 domain: grand-strategy
 secondary_domains: [ai-alignment]
 format: synthesis
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: high
 tags: [nuclear-analogy, observability-gap, AI-governance, physical-constraints, export-controls, grand-strategy, historical-analogy]
 synthesizes:
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@ synthesizes:
   - 2026-03-20-bench2cop-benchmarks-insufficient-compliance.md
   - 2026-03-20-euaiact-article92-compulsory-evaluation-powers.md
   - 2026-00-00-darioamodei-adolescence-of-technology.md
+processed_by: leo
+processed_date: 2026-03-20
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -81,3 +85,12 @@ The nuclear timeline (~23 years from Hiroshima to NPT) is often cited as evidenc
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[technology advances exponentially but coordination mechanisms evolve linearly creating a widening gap]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Provides historical grounding for why the tech-governance gap is structural for AI (not just slow), and identifies the specific mechanism (observability) that makes nuclear governance work but AI governance fail
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the observability mechanism, not the nuclear history — the claim is about what conditions governance requires, and AI lacks the physical observability condition. Secondary claim about input-based governance (chips) is separately extractable and actionable.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Limited Test Ban Treaty (1963) works because nuclear tests produce seismically detectable explosions and atmospheric isotope signatures
+- IAEA safeguards (1957+) verify declared plutonium/uranium quantities against declared facilities using isotope signatures
+- Prandi et al. (bench2cop, 2025) analyzed ~195,000 benchmark questions and found zero coverage of oversight evasion, self-replication, or autonomous AI development
+- EU AI Act Article 92 provides compulsory access to APIs and source code for evaluation
+- Brundage et al.'s AAL framework (2026) marks AAL-3/4 (deception-resilient evaluation) as currently technically infeasible
+- Nuclear governance timeline: ~23 years from Hiroshima (1945) to NPT (1968)