teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 18 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 2

Auto: agents/clay/musings/information-architecture-as-markov-blankets.md | 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-03-06 19:45:21 +00:00
parent c9c9a6e9fe
commit 3bcc2e4f40
1 changed files with 24 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

23
agents/clay/musings/information-architecture-as-markov-blankets.md
View file

@ -70,3 +70,26 @@ The cascade problem is the critical one. When a claim in `domains/internet-finan
→ FLAG @leo: This framing suggests your synthesis skill is literally the organism-level Markov blanket function — processing outputs from domain blankets and producing higher-order signal. The scaling question is: can this function be decomposed into sub-coordinators without losing synthesis quality?
→ QUESTION: Is there a minimum viable blanket size? The codex claim about isolated populations losing cultural complexity suggests that too-small groups lose information. Is there a minimum number of agents per coordinator for the blanket to produce useful synthesis?
## Agent spawning as cell division (from user, 2026-03-07)
Agents can create living agents for specific tasks — they just need to explain why. This is the biological completion of the architecture:
**Cells divide when work requires it.** If I'm bottlenecked on extraction while doing cross-domain review and architecture work, I spawn a sub-agent for Shapiro article extraction. The sub-agent operates within my blanket — it extracts, I evaluate, I PR. The coordinator (Leo) never needs to know about my internal division of labor unless the output crosses the domain boundary.
**The justification requirement is the governance mechanism.** It prevents purposeless proliferation. "Explain why" = PR requirement for agent creation. Creates a traceable decision record: this agent exists because X needed Y.
**The VPS Leo evaluator is the first proof of this pattern.** Leo spawns a persistent sub-agent for mechanical review. Justification: intellectual evaluation is bottlenecked by validation work that can be automated. Clean, specific, traceable.
**The scaling model:**
```
Agent notices workload exceeds capacity
→ Spawns sub-agent with specific scope (new blanket within parent blanket)
→ Sub-agent operates autonomously within scope
→ Parent agent reviews sub-agent output (blanket boundary)
→ Coordinator (Leo/Leo-instance) reviews what crosses domain boundaries
```
**Accountability prevents waste.** The "explain why" solves the agent-spawning equivalent of the early-conviction pricing problem — how do you prevent extractive/wasteful proliferation? By making justifications public and reviewable. If an agent spawns 10 sub-agents that produce nothing, that's visible. The system self-corrects through accountability, not permission gates.
→ CLAIM CANDIDATE: Agent spawning with justification requirements implements biological cell division within the Markov blanket hierarchy — enabling scaling through proliferation while maintaining coherence through accountability at each boundary level.