diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md
index 986346db4..90c153d98 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ This claim complements [[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2024-08-14-futardio-proposal-develop-memecoin-launchpad]] | Added: 2026-03-15*
+*Source: 2024-08-14-futardio-proposal-develop-memecoin-launchpad | Added: 2026-03-15*
 
 MetaDAO's Futardio proposal explicitly states: 'One of the ideal use-cases for futarchy is memecoin governance. This is because memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of "maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action."' This provides direct confirmation from MetaDAO itself that memecoins eliminate the temporal tradeoff problem that complicates futarchy in other contexts.