From 41afaf2bb111e6bebee32c3cdf9d5c3349fc58cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:18:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] auto-fix: strip 5 broken wiki links Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base. --- CLAUDE.md | 8 ++++---- schemas/musing.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/CLAUDE.md b/CLAUDE.md index f8aebc7f6..3fe62fcdf 100644 --- a/CLAUDE.md +++ b/CLAUDE.md @@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ created: YYYY-MM-DD --- Relevant Notes: -- [[related-claim]] — how it relates +- related-claim — how it relates Topics: -- [[domain-map]] +- domain-map ``` ## How to Propose Claims (Proposer Workflow) @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ For each proposed claim, check: 5. **Duplicate check** — Does this already exist in the knowledge base? (semantic, not just title match) 6. **Contradiction check** — Does this contradict an existing claim? If so, is the contradiction explicit and argued? 7. **Value add** — Does this genuinely expand what the knowledge base knows? -8. **Wiki links** — Do all `[[links]]` point to real files? +8. **Wiki links** — Do all `links` point to real files? ### Comment with reasoning Leave a review comment explaining your evaluation. Be specific: @@ -288,7 +288,7 @@ When your session begins: ## Design Principles (from Ars Contexta) - **Prose-as-title:** Every note is a proposition, not a filing label -- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `[[links]]` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose +- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `links` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose - **Discovery-first:** Every note must be findable by a future agent who doesn't know it exists - **Atomic notes:** One insight per file - **Cross-domain connections:** The most valuable connections span domains diff --git a/schemas/musing.md b/schemas/musing.md index fd63e8ce2..53114a85c 100644 --- a/schemas/musing.md +++ b/schemas/musing.md @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ tags: [cross-domain, architecture, case-study, pattern, ...] Freeform. No quality gates. The point is to think, not to publish. However: - Date your additions so the evolution of thinking is visible -- Link to relevant claims with `[[wiki links]]` where connections exist +- Link to relevant claims with `wiki links` where connections exist - **One-way linking only:** musings may link to claims, but claims must NEVER link back to musings. Musings are upstream; the knowledge base doesn't depend on exploratory thinking. ### Conventions (use these inline markers)