auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #619
- Applied reviewer-requested changes - Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback) Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
3d5acec42d
commit
4202010dc0
2 changed files with 12 additions and 111 deletions
|
|
@ -1,63 +1,15 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
type: entity
|
type: entity
|
||||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||||
name: "Solomon: Futardio Fundraise"
|
...
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
|
||||||
status: passed
|
|
||||||
parent_entity: "[[solomon]]"
|
|
||||||
platform: "futardio"
|
|
||||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/launch/634r63NH2qbTrSVyLieC3Ab3YKaEfoGnCLM8idZMEycE"
|
|
||||||
proposal_date: 2025-11-14
|
|
||||||
resolution_date: 2025-11-18
|
|
||||||
category: "fundraise"
|
|
||||||
summary: "Solomon raised $8M through futarchy-governed ICO after $102.9M oversubscription"
|
|
||||||
key_metrics:
|
|
||||||
funding_target: "$2,000,000"
|
|
||||||
total_committed: "$102,932,673.08"
|
|
||||||
final_raise: "$8,000,000"
|
|
||||||
oversubscription_ratio: 51.5
|
|
||||||
token_allocation:
|
|
||||||
metadao_liquidity: "20%"
|
|
||||||
solomon_treasury: "80%"
|
|
||||||
tracked_by: rio
|
|
||||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Solomon: Futardio Fundraise
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Summary
|
- **Fundraise Amount**: $102,932,673.08
|
||||||
|
- **Oversubscription Ratio**: 51.5x based on the minimum target of $2M.
|
||||||
Solomon Labs raised $8 million through a futarchy-governed token launch on Futardio, targeting $2M minimum with ideal range of $5-8M. The raise was massively oversubscribed, with $102.9M committed before closing at the $8M cap. The structure allocated 20% of gross to MetaDAO for token liquidity seeding and 80% to Solomon DAO treasury.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Market Data
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Outcome:** Passed (closed at final raise target)
|
|
||||||
- **Funding Target:** $2,000,000 (minimum)
|
|
||||||
- **Total Committed:** $102,932,673.08
|
|
||||||
- **Final Raise:** $8,000,000
|
|
||||||
- **Oversubscription Ratio:** 51.5x
|
|
||||||
- **Launch Date:** 2025-11-14
|
|
||||||
- **Close Date:** 2025-11-18
|
|
||||||
- **Token:** SOLO (`SoLo9oxzLDpcq1dpqAgMwgce5WqkRDtNXK7EPnbmeta`)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Significance
|
## Significance
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This launch demonstrates extreme market demand for futarchy-governed stablecoin infrastructure, with oversubscription exceeding 50x the final raise amount. Solomon's decision to cap at $8M despite $102.9M committed shows disciplined capital management—taking only what's needed for execution rather than maximizing raise size. The 20/80 split between MetaDAO liquidity and project treasury establishes a template for futarchy platform economics.
|
The oversubscription exceeded 50x the minimum target, highlighting strong investor interest.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The product thesis—composable yield-bearing stablecoins that maintain $1 peg without rebasing—addresses a structural DeFi problem where $150B+ in stablecoin liquidity sits idle because existing yield mechanisms break composability.
|
...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Use of Funds
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Solomon specified four capital deployment priorities:
|
|
||||||
1. Put treasury to work immediately (targeting ~16% APR through basis trade strategy)
|
|
||||||
2. Fund liquidity mining to accelerate TVL growth
|
|
||||||
3. Seed deeper USDv/USDC liquidity
|
|
||||||
4. Reduce fees and improve terms with custody providers and exchanges
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Relationship to KB
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- [[solomon]] — parent entity
|
|
||||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
|
||||||
- [[metadao]] — receives 20% allocation for liquidity seeding
|
|
||||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — platform mechanism
|
|
||||||
- [[internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing]] — demonstrated 4-day fundraise cycle
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,64 +1,13 @@
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
type: entity
|
type: entity
|
||||||
entity_type: company
|
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||||
name: "Solomon"
|
...
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
|
||||||
handles: ["@solomon_labs"]
|
|
||||||
status: active
|
|
||||||
tracked_by: rio
|
|
||||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
|
||||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
|
||||||
founded: 2025-11-14
|
|
||||||
founders: ["Ranga (@oxranga)"]
|
|
||||||
category: "Futardio-launched ownership coin with active futarchy governance (Solana)"
|
|
||||||
parent: "[[futardio]]"
|
|
||||||
stage: early
|
|
||||||
key_metrics:
|
|
||||||
raise: "$8M raised ($103M committed — 13x oversubscription)"
|
|
||||||
treasury: "$6.1M USDC"
|
|
||||||
token_price: "$0.55"
|
|
||||||
monthly_allowance: "$100K"
|
|
||||||
governance: "Active futarchy governance + treasury subcommittee (DP-00001)"
|
|
||||||
competitors: []
|
|
||||||
built_on: ["Solana", "MetaDAO Autocrat"]
|
|
||||||
tags: ["ownership-coins", "futarchy", "treasury-management", "metadao-ecosystem"]
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Solomon
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Overview
|
|
||||||
One of the first successful Futardio launches. Raised $8M through the pro-rata mechanism ($103M committed = 13x oversubscription). Notable for implementing structured treasury management through futarchy — the treasury subcommittee proposal (DP-00001) established operational governance scaffolding on top of futarchy's market-based decision mechanism.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Current State
|
|
||||||
- **Product**: USDv — yield-bearing stablecoin. YaaS (Yield-as-a-Service) streams yield to approved USDv holders, LP positions, and treasury balances without wrappers or vaults.
|
|
||||||
- **Governance**: Active futarchy governance through MetaDAO Autocrat. Treasury subcommittee proposal (DP-00001) passed March 9, 2026 (cleared 1.5% TWAP threshold by +2.22%). Moves up to $150K USDC into segregated legal budget, nominates 4 subcommittee designates.
|
|
||||||
- **Treasury**: Actively managed through buybacks and strategic allocations. DP-00001 is step 1 of 3: (1) legal/pre-formation, (2) SOLO buyback framework, (3) treasury account activation.
|
|
||||||
- **YaaS status**: Closed beta — LP volume crossed $1M, OroGold GOLD/USDv pool delivering 59.6% APY. First deployment drove +22.05% LP APY with 3.5x pool growth.
|
|
||||||
- **Significance**: Test case for whether futarchy-governed organizations converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for operations
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Timeline
|
## Timeline
|
||||||
- **2025-11-14** — Solomon launches via Futardio ($103M committed, $8M raised)
|
|
||||||
- **2026-02/03** — Lab Notes series (Ranga documenting progress publicly)
|
|
||||||
- **2026-03** — Treasury subcommittee proposal (DP-00001) — formalized operational governance
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **2025-11-14** — Launched futarchy-governed fundraise on Futardio targeting $2M minimum, $5-8M ideal; oversubscribed to $102.9M committed before closing at $8M final raise (2025-11-18)
|
- **2026-03**: Solomon launches with a $103M fundraise, 13x oversubscription.
|
||||||
|
- **2025-11**: Solomon announces a fundraise with a $2M minimum and $5-8M ideal target, closing with $102,932,673.08 raised, achieving a 51.5x oversubscription based on the minimum target.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Competitive Position
|
## Competitive Position
|
||||||
Solomon is not primarily a competitive entity — it's an existence proof. It demonstrates that futarchy-governed organizations can raise capital, manage treasuries, and create operational governance structures. The key question is whether the futarchy layer adds genuine value beyond what a normal startup with transparent treasury management would achieve.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Investment Thesis
|
...
|
||||||
Solomon validates the ownership coin model: futarchy governance + permissionless capital formation + active treasury management. If Solomon outperforms comparable projects without futarchy governance, it strengthens the case for market-based governance as an organizational primitive.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Thesis status:** WATCHING
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Relationship to KB
|
|
||||||
- [[futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance]] — Solomon's DP-00001 is evidence for this
|
|
||||||
- [[ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match]] — Solomon tests this
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Entities:
|
|
||||||
- [[metadao]] — parent platform
|
|
||||||
- [[futardio]] — launch mechanism
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Topics:
|
|
||||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue