diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-01-01-aisi-sketch-ai-control-safety-case.md b/inbox/null-result/2026-01-01-aisi-sketch-ai-control-safety-case.md
similarity index 98%
rename from inbox/queue/2026-01-01-aisi-sketch-ai-control-safety-case.md
rename to inbox/null-result/2026-01-01-aisi-sketch-ai-control-safety-case.md
index c101a17d..1f87d69e 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-01-01-aisi-sketch-ai-control-safety-case.md
+++ b/inbox/null-result/2026-01-01-aisi-sketch-ai-control-safety-case.md
@@ -7,10 +7,11 @@ date: 2026-01-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: [grand-strategy]
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: medium
 tags: [AISI, control-safety-case, safety-argument, loss-of-control, governance-framework, institutional]
 flagged_for_leo: ["this is the governance architecture side — AISI is building not just evaluation tools but a structured argument framework for claiming AI is safe to deploy; the gap between this framework and the sandbagging/detection-failure findings in other AISI papers is itself a governance signal"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content