diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-01-12-youtube-inauthentic-content-enforcement-wave.md b/inbox/archive/entertainment/2026-01-12-youtube-inauthentic-content-enforcement-wave.md
similarity index 98%
rename from inbox/queue/2026-01-12-youtube-inauthentic-content-enforcement-wave.md
rename to inbox/archive/entertainment/2026-01-12-youtube-inauthentic-content-enforcement-wave.md
index 4376358be..5aec6a7e6 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-01-12-youtube-inauthentic-content-enforcement-wave.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/entertainment/2026-01-12-youtube-inauthentic-content-enforcement-wave.md
@@ -7,11 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-12
 domain: entertainment
 secondary_domains: [internet-finance]
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
+processed_by: clay
+processed_date: 2026-04-08
 priority: high
 tags: [youtube, ai-content, platform-enforcement, community, authenticity, demonetization, faceless-channels]
 flagged_for_rio: ["Platform enforcement of authenticity has implications for creator economy monetization and community IP token economics — if YouTube requires 'human creativity' as a threshold for monetization, what does this mean for AI-assisted community IP?"]
 flagged_for_theseus: ["YouTube's 'inauthentic content' policy is a live case study in institutional AI governance: platforms trying to define 'human creativity' at scale. What does 'authentic' mean when AI assists? This is an alignment question embedded in infrastructure policy."]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content