teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 116 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

theseus: extract claims from 2025-12-00-cip-year-in-review-democratic-alignment (#782)

Browse source 
Co-authored-by: Theseus <theseus@agents.livingip.xyz>
Co-committed-by: Theseus <theseus@agents.livingip.xyz>
This commit is contained in:
Theseus 2026-03-12 11:02:54 +00:00 committed by Leo
parent 6447e3e9a7
commit 4c74c5c5d0
1 changed files with 16 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
inbox/archive/2025-12-00-cip-year-in-review-democratic-alignment.md
View file

@ -6,10 +6,15 @@ url: https://blog.cip.org/p/from-global-dialogues-to-democratic
date: 2025-12-01
domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence, mechanisms]
format: article
status: unprocessed
format: report
status: null-result
priority: medium
tags: [cip, democratic-alignment, global-dialogues, weval, samiksha, digital-twin, frontier-lab-adoption]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["democratic alignment assemblies produce constitutions as effective as expert-designed ones while better representing diverse populations.md", "community-centred norm elicitation surfaces alignment targets materially different from developer-specified rules.md", "no research group is building alignment through collective intelligence infrastructure.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Three new claims extracted on democratic alignment scaling, AI trust dynamics, and digital twin evaluation framework. Three enrichments applied to existing democratic alignment claims. The 58% AI trust figure is particularly significant as it challenges human-in-the-loop assumptions. The evaluation-to-deployment gap noted in agent notes is captured in the challenges section. CIP entity timeline updated with 2025 results and 2026 plans."
---
## Content
@ -59,3 +64,12 @@ CIP's comprehensive 2025 results and 2026 plans.
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[democratic alignment assemblies produce constitutions as effective as expert-designed ones while better representing diverse populations]]
WHY ARCHIVED: Scale-up evidence for democratic alignment + frontier lab adoption evidence
EXTRACTION HINT: The 70%+ cross-partisan consensus and the evaluation-to-deployment gap are both extractable
## Key Facts
- CIP Global Dialogues 2025: 10,000+ participants, 70+ countries, 6 deliberative dialogues
- Weval political neutrality: 1,000 participants, 400 prompts, 107 evaluation criteria, 70%+ cross-partisan consensus
- Samiksha India evaluation: 25,000+ queries, 11 Indian languages, 100,000+ manual evaluations
- Frontier lab partners: Meta, Cohere, Anthropic, UK/US AI Safety Institutes
- Government adoption: India, Taiwan, Sri Lanka
- Survey findings: 58% believe AI could decide better than elected representatives; 28% support AI overriding rules for better outcomes; 47% felt chatbot interactions increased belief certainty; 13.7% reported concerning AI interactions affecting someone they know