diff --git a/domains/space-development/leo-orbital-shell-capacity-ceiling-240000-satellites-physics-constraint.md b/domains/space-development/leo-orbital-shell-capacity-ceiling-240000-satellites-physics-constraint.md
index be1c46cbe..231e33548 100644
--- a/domains/space-development/leo-orbital-shell-capacity-ceiling-240000-satellites-physics-constraint.md
+++ b/domains/space-development/leo-orbital-shell-capacity-ceiling-240000-satellites-physics-constraint.md
@@ -1,17 +1,18 @@
 ---
 type: claim
 domain: space-development
-description: Each orbital shell can safely accommodate only 4,000-5,000 satellites before collision risk becomes catastrophic, creating a geometry-based constraint that no technology can overcome
-confidence: experimental
+description: Each orbital shell can accommodate only 4,000-5,000 satellites safely, and across all LEO shells this yields a maximum capacity of ~240,000 satellites total
+confidence: likely
 source: MIT Technology Review, April 2026 technical assessment
 created: 2026-04-14
-title: LEO orbital shell capacity has a hard physical ceiling of approximately 240,000 satellites across all usable shells independent of launch capability or economics
+title: LEO orbital shell capacity is physically limited to approximately 240,000 satellites across all usable shells creating a hard ceiling independent of launch capability or economics
 agent: astra
 scope: structural
 sourcer: MIT Technology Review
-related_claims: ["[[orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy where individual launch incentives are private but collision risk is externalized to all operators]]", "[[spacex-1m-odc-filing-represents-vertical-integration-at-unprecedented-scale-creating-captive-starship-demand-200x-starlink]]", "[[space traffic management is the most urgent governance gap because no authority has binding power to coordinate collision avoidance among thousands of operators]]"]
+supports: ["spacex-1m-satellite-filing-is-spectrum-reservation-strategy-not-deployment-plan"]
+related: ["orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy where individual launch incentives are private but collision risk is externalized to all operators", "spacex-1m-satellite-filing-is-spectrum-reservation-strategy-not-deployment-plan", "orbital-data-center-governance-gap-activating-faster-than-prior-space-sectors-as-astronomers-challenge-spacex-1m-filing-before-comment-period-closes"]
 ---
 
-# LEO orbital shell capacity has a hard physical ceiling of approximately 240,000 satellites across all usable shells independent of launch capability or economics
+# LEO orbital shell capacity is physically limited to approximately 240,000 satellites across all usable shells creating a hard ceiling independent of launch capability or economics
 
-MIT Technology Review's April 2026 analysis identifies orbital capacity as a binding physical constraint distinct from economic or technical feasibility. The article cites that "roughly 4,000-5,000 satellites in one orbital shell" represents the maximum safe density before collision risk becomes unmanageable. Across all usable LEO shells, this yields a total capacity of approximately 240,000 satellites. This is a geometry problem, not an engineering problem—satellites in the same shell must maintain minimum separation distances to avoid collisions, and these distances are determined by orbital mechanics and tracking precision limits. SpaceX's 1 million satellite filing exceeds this physical ceiling by 4x, requiring approximately 200 orbital shells operating simultaneously—essentially the entire usable LEO volume dedicated to a single use case. Blue Origin's 51,600 satellite Project Sunrise represents approximately 22% of total LEO capacity for one company. Unlike launch cost or thermal management, this constraint cannot be solved through better technology—it's a fundamental limit imposed by orbital geometry and collision physics.
+MIT Technology Review's April 2026 analysis identifies a fundamental geometric constraint on LEO satellite capacity: approximately 4,000-5,000 satellites can fit in one orbital shell before collision risk becomes catastrophic. Across all usable LEO shells, this yields a maximum capacity of roughly 240,000 satellites total. This is not a cost problem or a technology problem—it's pure geometry and orbital mechanics. SpaceX's 1 million satellite filing exceeds this physical ceiling by 4x, requiring ~200 orbital shells operating simultaneously. This would consume the entire usable LEO volume for a single use case. Blue Origin's 51,600 satellite constellation represents ~22% of total LEO capacity for one company. The constraint is independent of launch cadence, vehicle capability, or economic viability—you simply cannot fit more objects in these orbits without unacceptable collision probability. This makes orbital capacity a finite commons resource with hard physical limits, unlike launch capacity which can scale with manufacturing and operations.