diff --git a/inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-30-tg-shared-jabranthelawyer-2038413063381246199-s-20.md b/inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-30-tg-shared-jabranthelawyer-2038413063381246199-s-20.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..6e26f69a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-30-tg-shared-jabranthelawyer-2038413063381246199-s-20.md
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+type: source
+source_type: x-tweet
+title: "@jabranthelawyer — shared via Telegram by @m3taversal"
+author: "@jabranthelawyer"
+url: "https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20"
+date: 2026-03-30
+domain: internet-finance
+format: social-media
+status: processed
+proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
+contribution_type: source-submission
+tags: ['telegram-shared', 'x-tweet', 'governance']
+---
+
+# @jabranthelawyer — Tweet/Thread
+
+Shared by @m3taversal via Telegram.
+Source URL: https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20
+
+## Content
+
+Few thoughts if I was MetaDAO's lawyer:
+
+1. P2P did something objectively wrong. Whether illegal TBC but possible
+
+2. Regulators look at conduct and by exercising control, it creates bad precedent in two ways here:
+
+A) They've moved from simply a "fundraising platform" to one actively involved in raise 
+
+B) By stating that founders past experience +  is basis to continue raise, they've created a due diligence obligation on themselves
+
+- Best to check the indemnities founders provide to ensure they're covered because all of this has just increased MetaDAO's risk profile unnecessarily imo