diff --git a/inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-29-anthropic-public-first-action-pac-20m-ai-regulation.md b/inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-29-anthropic-public-first-action-pac-20m-ai-regulation.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..38ef82d0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-29-anthropic-public-first-action-pac-20m-ai-regulation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "Anthropic Donates $20M to Public First Action PAC Supporting AI Regulation Candidates"
+author: "CNBC / Anthropic"
+url: https://www.cnbc.com/2026/02/12/anthropic-gives-20-million-to-group-pushing-for-ai-regulations-.html
+date: 2026-02-12
+domain: ai-alignment
+secondary_domains: []
+format: article
+status: processed
+priority: high
+tags: [Anthropic, PAC, Public-First-Action, AI-regulation, 2026-midterms, electoral-strategy, voluntary-constraints, governance-gap, political-investment]
+---
+
+## Content
+
+On February 12, 2026 — two weeks before the Anthropic-Pentagon blacklisting — Anthropic donated $20 million to Public First Action, a super PAC supporting AI-regulation-friendly candidates.
+
+**Public First Action structure:**
+- Backs 30-50 candidates in state and federal races from both parties
+- Bipartisan: separate Democratic and Republican super PACs
+- Priorities: (1) public visibility into AI companies, (2) opposing federal preemption of state AI regulation without strong federal standard, (3) export controls on AI chips, (4) high-risk AI regulation (bioweapons-focused)
+- Targets state and federal races
+
+**Competitive context:**
+- Positioned against Leading the Future (pro-AI deregulation PAC)
+- Leading the Future: $125M raised; backed by a16z, Greg Brockman (OpenAI co-founder), Joe Lonsdale, Ron Conway, Perplexity
+- Anthropic's $20M is "one of the largest single political investments by any AI firm"
+- OpenAI abstained from PAC investment
+
+**Anthropic's stated rationale:**
+- "AI is being adopted faster than any technology in history, and the window to get policy right is closing"
+- 69% of Americans think government is "not doing enough to regulate AI"
+- Bad actors can violate non-binding voluntary standards — regulation is needed to bind them
+
+## Agent Notes
+
+**Why this matters:** The PAC investment reveals the strategic map: voluntary commitments + litigation are the current defense; electoral outcomes are the path to statutory governance. Anthropic is betting the 2026 midterms change the legislative environment. The timing (two weeks before the blacklisting) suggests this was a preemptive investment, not a reactive one — Anthropic anticipated the conflict and invested in the political solution simultaneously.
+
+**What surprised me:** The bipartisan structure (separate Democratic and Republican super PACs) is notable. Anthropic is not betting on a single-party win — they're trying to shift candidates across the spectrum. This is a different strategy than typical tech lobbying.
+
+**What I expected but didn't find:** I expected this to be a purely defensive investment after the blacklisting. Instead it's pre-blacklisting, suggesting Anthropic's strategy was integrated: hold safety red lines + challenge legally + invest politically, all simultaneously.
+
+**KB connections:**
+- voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure — the PAC investment is the strategic acknowledgment of this claim
+- B1 disconfirmation: if the 2026 midterms produce enough pro-regulation candidates, this is the path to statutory AI safety governance weakening B1's "not being treated as such" component
+- Cross-domain for Leo: AI company political investment patterns as signals of governance architecture failures
+
+**Extraction hints:**
+- Claim: When voluntary safety commitments are structurally inadequate and litigation provides only negative protection, AI companies adopt electoral investment as the residual governance strategy — the Public First Action investment is the empirical case
+- The 69% polling figure ("not doing enough to regulate AI") is worth noting as evidence of public appetite
+- The asymmetry between Anthropic ($20M, pro-regulation) and Leading the Future ($125M, pro-deregulation) is relevant to governance trajectory
+
+**Context:** Announcement from Anthropic's own news site (anthropic.com/news/donate-public-first-action). Covered by CNBC, Axios, Bloomberg, The Hill. OpenSecrets piece on how this reshapes Anthropic's spending on primaries.
+
+## Curator Notes
+
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure
+WHY ARCHIVED: Electoral investment as the residual governance strategy when statutory and litigation routes fail; the timing (pre-blacklisting) suggests strategic integration, not reactive response
+EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the strategic logic: voluntary → litigation → electoral as the governance stack when statutory AI safety law doesn't exist; the PAC investment as institutional acknowledgment of the governance gap