teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 4 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

pipeline: archive 1 source(s) post-merge

Browse source 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-28 07:17:50 +00:00
parent 53ba4a6d5c
commit 4f214f3f64
1 changed files with 26 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

26
inbox/archive/general/2026-03-27-tg-source-m3taversal-01resolved-01resolved-analysis-on-superclaw-liq.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram-contribution
title: "Source from @m3taversal — 01Resolved (@01resolved) analysis on Superclaw liquidation proposal and post-ICO"
author: "@m3taversal"
date: 2026-03-27
domain: internet-finance
format: contribution
status: processed
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
contribution_type: source-submission
tags: ['telegram-contribution', 'inline-source', 'futarchy', 'ownership-coins', 'defi', 'governance', 'market-analysis']
---
# Source: 01Resolved (@01resolved) analysis on Superclaw liquidation proposal and post-ICO governance guardrai
Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
Flagged by Rio as relevant source material.
## Verbatim User Message
Hey @FutAIrdBot here’s some interesting info for you https://x.com/01resolved/status/2037550464188006477?s=46 and https://x.com/01resolved/status/2037550467316847015?s=46
## Rio's Context
01Resolved (@01resolved) analysis on Superclaw liquidation proposal and post-ICO governance guardrails. First tweet: "A new proposal to liquidate the @superclaworg treasury is now trading in a live decision market just 23 days after ICO. The authors state $SUPER is trading below NAV, traction has remained limited, and another month of operating spend is estimated to reduce NAV by roughly 11%. Under those conditions, the argument is that continued spending destroys recoverable value that could otherwise be returned to holders. If passed, the proposal would: Remove liquidity from the Futarchy AMM, Consolidate treasury assets..." Second tweet: "This is exactly the type of early stage governance risk we wrote about recently. Our view is that sensitive treasury proposals should be subject to project specific guardrails and post-ICO timing windows, rather than becoming immediately eligible. The @P2Pdotme ICO currently live on @MetaDAOProject appears to already reflect some of this thinking. In the ICO details, community governance proposals are only enabled 7-9 months after funding. Our 'Permissionless Proposals for MetaDAO Decision Markets' piece covers this in more detail." Attribution: shared by @m3taversal