extract: 2026-03-19-solanacompass-metadao-futarchy-amm-liquidity
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c729eab628
commit
4fc5ee2ba5
2 changed files with 38 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "metadao-liquidity-borrowing-creates-market-cap-dependent-governance-quality-gradient.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"validation_stats": {
|
||||||
|
"total": 1,
|
||||||
|
"kept": 0,
|
||||||
|
"fixed": 3,
|
||||||
|
"rejected": 1,
|
||||||
|
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||||
|
"metadao-liquidity-borrowing-creates-market-cap-dependent-governance-quality-gradient.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
|
||||||
|
"metadao-liquidity-borrowing-creates-market-cap-dependent-governance-quality-gradient.md:stripped_wiki_link:futarchy-is-manipulation-resistant-because-attack-attempts-c",
|
||||||
|
"metadao-liquidity-borrowing-creates-market-cap-dependent-governance-quality-gradient.md:stripped_wiki_link:optimal-governance-requires-mixing-mechanisms-because-differ"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"rejections": [
|
||||||
|
"metadao-liquidity-borrowing-creates-market-cap-dependent-governance-quality-gradient.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||||
|
"date": "2026-03-20"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-02-01
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
secondary_domains: []
|
secondary_domains: []
|
||||||
format: thread
|
format: thread
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: enrichment
|
||||||
priority: high
|
priority: high
|
||||||
tags: [metadao, futarchy-amm, liquidity, governance-markets, mechanism-design, spot-pool]
|
tags: [metadao, futarchy-amm, liquidity, governance-markets, mechanism-design, spot-pool]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-20
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -57,3 +60,11 @@ Detailed explanation of MetaDAO's Futarchy AMM liquidity borrowing mechanism, so
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides the mechanism explanation for WHY manipulation resistance scales with market cap — the 50% borrowing design codifies the relationship
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides the mechanism explanation for WHY manipulation resistance scales with market cap — the 50% borrowing design codifies the relationship
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on deriving the scope condition from the mechanism design — governance market depth = f(spot liquidity) = f(market cap). This gives a precise scope qualifier for the manipulation resistance claim.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on deriving the scope condition from the mechanism design — governance market depth = f(spot liquidity) = f(market cap). This gives a precise scope qualifier for the manipulation resistance claim.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- MetaDAO's futarchy AMM borrows 50% of total spot liquidity when a proposal launches
|
||||||
|
- The remaining 50% of liquidity continues servicing regular token trades during proposals
|
||||||
|
- Previously, proposers needed approximately $150,000 in capital to fund proposal markets
|
||||||
|
- MetaDAO implemented spending limits based on real-world observations
|
||||||
|
- MetaDAO transitioned from capped to uncapped raises based on feedback
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue