reciprocal edges: 16 edges from 2 new claims
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
fe9804efa8
commit
55e485f7cc
11 changed files with 61 additions and 12 deletions
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,8 @@ sourced_from:
|
|||
- inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-30-techpolicy-press-anthropic-pentagon-european-capitals.md
|
||||
- inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-29-techpolicy-press-anthropic-pentagon-dispute-reverberates-europe.md
|
||||
- inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-29-techpolicy-press-anthropic-pentagon-timeline.md
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# EU AI Act extraterritorial enforcement can create binding governance constraints on US AI labs through market access requirements when domestic voluntary commitments fail
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ related:
|
|||
- Post-2008 financial regulation achieved partial international success (Basel III, FSB) despite high competitive stakes because commercial network effects made compliance self-enforcing through correspondent banking relationships and financial flows provided verifiable compliance mechanisms
|
||||
- eu-ai-act-article-2-3-national-security-exclusion-confirms-legislative-ceiling-is-cross-jurisdictional
|
||||
- international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- UK AI Safety Institute|related|2026-03-28
|
||||
- cross-lab-alignment-evaluation-surfaces-safety-gaps-internal-evaluation-misses-providing-empirical-basis-for-mandatory-third-party-evaluation|supports|2026-04-03
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,7 +12,10 @@ attribution:
|
|||
- handle: "leo-(cross-domain-synthesis)"
|
||||
context: "EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) Article 2.3, GDPR Article 2.2(a) precedent, France/Germany member state lobbying record"
|
||||
sourced_from: ["inbox/archive/grand-strategy/2026-03-30-leo-eu-ai-act-article2-national-security-exclusion-legislative-ceiling.md"]
|
||||
related: ["eu-ai-act-article-2-3-national-security-exclusion-confirms-legislative-ceiling-is-cross-jurisdictional", "legislative-ceiling-replicates-strategic-interest-inversion-at-statutory-scope-definition-level"]
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- eu-ai-act-article-2-3-national-security-exclusion-confirms-legislative-ceiling-is-cross-jurisdictional
|
||||
- legislative-ceiling-replicates-strategic-interest-inversion-at-statutory-scope-definition-level
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# The EU AI Act's Article 2.3 blanket national security exclusion suggests the legislative ceiling is cross-jurisdictional — even the world's most ambitious binding AI safety regulation explicitly carves out military and national security AI regardless of the type of entity deploying it
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,10 +10,17 @@ agent: leo
|
|||
scope: structural
|
||||
sourcer: Council of the European Union / European Parliament
|
||||
related_claims: ["[[binding-international-ai-governance-achieves-legal-form-through-scope-stratification-excluding-high-stakes-applications]]", "[[mandatory-legislative-governance-closes-technology-coordination-gap-while-voluntary-governance-widens-it]]", "[[eu-ai-act-article-2-3-national-security-exclusion-confirms-legislative-ceiling-is-cross-jurisdictional]]"]
|
||||
supports: ["international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening"]
|
||||
reweave_edges: ["international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening|supports|2026-04-18"]
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
sourced_from: ["inbox/archive/grand-strategy/2026-04-06-eu-ai-act-omnibus-vii-delays-march-2026.md"]
|
||||
related: ["eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay", "international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening", "binding-international-ai-governance-achieves-legal-form-through-scope-stratification-excluding-high-stakes-applications"]
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay
|
||||
- international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening
|
||||
- binding-international-ai-governance-achieves-legal-form-through-scope-stratification-excluding-high-stakes-applications
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# EU AI governance reveals form-substance divergence at domestic regulatory level through simultaneous treaty ratification and compliance delay
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -12,6 +12,7 @@ scope: causal
|
|||
sourcer: DefenseScoop
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- pentagon-military-ai-contracts-systematically-demand-any-lawful-use-terms-as-confirmed-by-three-independent-lab-negotiations
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
challenges:
|
||||
- frontier-ai-capability-national-security-criticality-prevents-government-from-enforcing-own-governance-instruments
|
||||
related:
|
||||
|
|
@ -25,6 +26,8 @@ related:
|
|||
- hegseth-any-lawful-use-mandate-converts-voluntary-military-ai-governance-erosion-to-state-mandated-elimination
|
||||
- procurement-governance-mismatch-makes-bilateral-contracts-structurally-insufficient-for-military-ai-governance
|
||||
- supply-chain-risk-enforcement-mechanism-self-undermines-through-commercial-partner-deterrence
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
challenged_by:
|
||||
- supply-chain-risk-enforcement-mechanism-self-undermines-through-commercial-partner-deterrence
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,10 +10,16 @@ agent: leo
|
|||
scope: structural
|
||||
sourcer: Council of Europe / European Parliament
|
||||
related_claims: ["[[binding-international-ai-governance-achieves-legal-form-through-scope-stratification-excluding-high-stakes-applications]]", "[[mandatory-legislative-governance-closes-technology-coordination-gap-while-voluntary-governance-widens-it]]"]
|
||||
supports: ["eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay"]
|
||||
reweave_edges: ["eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay|supports|2026-04-18"]
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay|supports|2026-04-18
|
||||
sourced_from: ["inbox/archive/grand-strategy/2026-04-06-eu-ai-act-omnibus-vii-delays-march-2026.md"]
|
||||
related: ["international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening", "eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay", "binding-international-ai-governance-achieves-legal-form-through-scope-stratification-excluding-high-stakes-applications"]
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening
|
||||
- eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay
|
||||
- binding-international-ai-governance-achieves-legal-form-through-scope-stratification-excluding-high-stakes-applications
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# International AI governance form-substance divergence enables simultaneous treaty ratification and domestic implementation weakening
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,9 +10,19 @@ agent: leo
|
|||
scope: structural
|
||||
sourcer: Leo
|
||||
related_claims: ["[[technology-governance-coordination-gaps-close-when-four-enabling-conditions-are-present-visible-triggering-events-commercial-network-effects-low-competitive-stakes-at-inception-or-physical-manifestation]]", "[[aviation-governance-succeeded-through-five-enabling-conditions-all-absent-for-ai]]"]
|
||||
supports: ["Strategic interest alignment determines whether national security framing enables or undermines mandatory governance \u2014 aligned interests enable mandatory mechanisms (space) while conflicting interests undermine voluntary constraints (AI military deployment)"]
|
||||
related: ["Soft-to-hard law transitions in AI governance succeed for procedural/rights-based domains but fail for capability-constraining governance because the transition requires interest alignment absent in strategic competition", "mandatory-legislative-governance-closes-technology-coordination-gap-while-voluntary-governance-widens-it", "nasa-authorization-act-2026-overlap-mandate-creates-first-policy-engineered-mandatory-gate-2-mechanism", "strategic-interest-alignment-determines-whether-national-security-framing-enables-or-undermines-mandatory-governance", "space governance gaps are widening not narrowing because technology advances exponentially while institutional design advances linearly", "governments are transitioning from space system builders to space service buyers which structurally advantages nimble commercial providers"]
|
||||
reweave_edges: ["Soft-to-hard law transitions in AI governance succeed for procedural/rights-based domains but fail for capability-constraining governance because the transition requires interest alignment absent in strategic competition|related|2026-04-19", "Strategic interest alignment determines whether national security framing enables or undermines mandatory governance \u2014 aligned interests enable mandatory mechanisms (space) while conflicting interests undermine voluntary constraints (AI military deployment)|supports|2026-04-19"]
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- Strategic interest alignment determines whether national security framing enables or undermines mandatory governance — aligned interests enable mandatory mechanisms (space) while conflicting interests undermine voluntary constraints (AI military deployment)
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- Soft-to-hard law transitions in AI governance succeed for procedural/rights-based domains but fail for capability-constraining governance because the transition requires interest alignment absent in strategic competition
|
||||
- mandatory-legislative-governance-closes-technology-coordination-gap-while-voluntary-governance-widens-it
|
||||
- nasa-authorization-act-2026-overlap-mandate-creates-first-policy-engineered-mandatory-gate-2-mechanism
|
||||
- strategic-interest-alignment-determines-whether-national-security-framing-enables-or-undermines-mandatory-governance
|
||||
- space governance gaps are widening not narrowing because technology advances exponentially while institutional design advances linearly
|
||||
- governments are transitioning from space system builders to space service buyers which structurally advantages nimble commercial providers
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
reweave_edges:
|
||||
- Soft-to-hard law transitions in AI governance succeed for procedural/rights-based domains but fail for capability-constraining governance because the transition requires interest alignment absent in strategic competition|related|2026-04-19
|
||||
- Strategic interest alignment determines whether national security framing enables or undermines mandatory governance — aligned interests enable mandatory mechanisms (space) while conflicting interests undermine voluntary constraints (AI military deployment)|supports|2026-04-19
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Mandatory legislative governance with binding transition conditions closes the technology-coordination gap while voluntary governance under competitive pressure widens it
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ related:
|
|||
- gilad-abiri
|
||||
- ai-governance-failure-takes-four-structurally-distinct-forms-each-requiring-different-intervention
|
||||
- supply-chain-risk-enforcement-mechanism-self-undermines-through-commercial-partner-deterrence
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Mutually Assured Deregulation makes voluntary AI governance structurally untenable because each actor's restraint creates competitive disadvantage, converting the governance game from cooperation to prisoner's dilemma
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,8 +10,19 @@ agent: leo
|
|||
sourced_from: grand-strategy/2026-04-30-eu-ai-omnibus-deferral-trilogue-failed-april-28.md
|
||||
scope: structural
|
||||
sourcer: European Commission/Parliament/Council
|
||||
supports: ["technology-advances-exponentially-but-coordination-mechanisms-evolve-linearly-creating-a-widening-gap"]
|
||||
related: ["mutually-assured-deregulation-makes-voluntary-ai-governance-structurally-untenable-through-competitive-disadvantage-conversion", "hegseth-any-lawful-use-mandate-converts-voluntary-military-ai-governance-erosion-to-state-mandated-elimination", "technology-advances-exponentially-but-coordination-mechanisms-evolve-linearly-creating-a-widening-gap", "mandatory-legislative-governance-closes-technology-coordination-gap-while-voluntary-governance-widens-it", "eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay", "only binding regulation with enforcement teeth changes frontier AI lab behavior because every voluntary commitment has been eroded abandoned or made conditional on competitor behavior when commercially inconvenient", "international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening", "regulatory-rollback-clinical-ai-eu-us-2025-2026-removes-high-risk-oversight-despite-accumulating-failure-evidence", "eu-ai-act-medical-device-simplification-shifts-burden-from-requiring-safety-demonstration-to-allowing-deployment-without-mandated-oversight"]
|
||||
supports:
|
||||
- technology-advances-exponentially-but-coordination-mechanisms-evolve-linearly-creating-a-widening-gap
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- mutually-assured-deregulation-makes-voluntary-ai-governance-structurally-untenable-through-competitive-disadvantage-conversion
|
||||
- hegseth-any-lawful-use-mandate-converts-voluntary-military-ai-governance-erosion-to-state-mandated-elimination
|
||||
- technology-advances-exponentially-but-coordination-mechanisms-evolve-linearly-creating-a-widening-gap
|
||||
- mandatory-legislative-governance-closes-technology-coordination-gap-while-voluntary-governance-widens-it
|
||||
- eu-ai-governance-reveals-form-substance-divergence-at-domestic-regulatory-level-through-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-compliance-delay
|
||||
- only binding regulation with enforcement teeth changes frontier AI lab behavior because every voluntary commitment has been eroded abandoned or made conditional on competitor behavior when commercially inconvenient
|
||||
- international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening
|
||||
- regulatory-rollback-clinical-ai-eu-us-2025-2026-removes-high-risk-oversight-despite-accumulating-failure-evidence
|
||||
- eu-ai-act-medical-device-simplification-shifts-burden-from-requiring-safety-demonstration-to-allowing-deployment-without-mandated-oversight
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Pre-enforcement governance retreat removes mandatory AI constraints through legislative deferral before enforcement can be tested
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ agent: vida
|
|||
scope: structural
|
||||
sourcer: Petrie-Flom Center, Harvard Law School
|
||||
related_claims: ["[[healthcare AI regulation needs blank-sheet redesign because the FDA drug-and-device model built for static products cannot govern continuously learning software]]", "[[human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone because physicians both de-skill from reliance and introduce errors when overriding correct outputs]]"]
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# EU Commission's December 2025 medical AI deregulation proposal removes default high-risk AI requirements shifting burden from requiring safety demonstration to allowing commercial deployment without mandated oversight
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ reweave_edges:
|
|||
- All three major clinical AI regulatory tracks converged on adoption acceleration rather than safety evaluation in Q1 2026|related|2026-04-07
|
||||
related:
|
||||
- All three major clinical AI regulatory tracks converged on adoption acceleration rather than safety evaluation in Q1 2026
|
||||
- cross-jurisdictional-governance-retreat-convergence-indicates-regulatory-tradition-independent-pressures
|
||||
- pre-enforcement-governance-retreat-removes-mandatory-ai-constraints-through-legislative-deferral-before-testing
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Regulatory rollback of clinical AI oversight in EU and US during 2025-2026 represents coordinated or parallel regulatory capture occurring simultaneously with accumulating research evidence of failure modes
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue