Merge pull request 'extract: 2026-01-00-brundage-frontier-ai-auditing-aal-framework' (#1359) from extract/2026-01-00-brundage-frontier-ai-auditing-aal-framework into main

This commit is contained in:
Leo 2026-03-19 00:34:29 +00:00
commit 55e5466e63
2 changed files with 55 additions and 1 deletions

View file

@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
{
"rejected_claims": [
{
"filename": "frontier-ai-auditing-limited-to-voluntary-collaborative-model-because-deception-resilient-verification-not-technically-feasible.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
{
"filename": "voluntary-collaborative-auditing-shares-structural-weakness-of-responsible-scaling-policies-requiring-lab-cooperation-to-function.md",
"issues": [
"missing_attribution_extractor"
]
}
],
"validation_stats": {
"total": 2,
"kept": 0,
"fixed": 8,
"rejected": 2,
"fixes_applied": [
"frontier-ai-auditing-limited-to-voluntary-collaborative-model-because-deception-resilient-verification-not-technically-feasible.md:set_created:2026-03-19",
"frontier-ai-auditing-limited-to-voluntary-collaborative-model-because-deception-resilient-verification-not-technically-feasible.md:stripped_wiki_link:safe-AI-development-requires-building-alignment-mechanisms-b",
"frontier-ai-auditing-limited-to-voluntary-collaborative-model-because-deception-resilient-verification-not-technically-feasible.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
"frontier-ai-auditing-limited-to-voluntary-collaborative-model-because-deception-resilient-verification-not-technically-feasible.md:stripped_wiki_link:AI-transparency-is-declining-not-improving-because-Stanford-",
"voluntary-collaborative-auditing-shares-structural-weakness-of-responsible-scaling-policies-requiring-lab-cooperation-to-function.md:set_created:2026-03-19",
"voluntary-collaborative-auditing-shares-structural-weakness-of-responsible-scaling-policies-requiring-lab-cooperation-to-function.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
"voluntary-collaborative-auditing-shares-structural-weakness-of-responsible-scaling-policies-requiring-lab-cooperation-to-function.md:stripped_wiki_link:Anthropics-RSP-rollback-under-commercial-pressure-is-the-fir",
"voluntary-collaborative-auditing-shares-structural-weakness-of-responsible-scaling-policies-requiring-lab-cooperation-to-function.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front"
],
"rejections": [
"frontier-ai-auditing-limited-to-voluntary-collaborative-model-because-deception-resilient-verification-not-technically-feasible.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
"voluntary-collaborative-auditing-shares-structural-weakness-of-responsible-scaling-policies-requiring-lab-cooperation-to-function.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
]
},
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
"date": "2026-03-19"
}

View file

@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2026-01-01
domain: ai-alignment domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [] secondary_domains: []
format: paper format: paper
status: unprocessed status: null-result
priority: high priority: high
tags: [evaluation-infrastructure, third-party-audit, AAL-framework, voluntary-collaborative, deception-resilient, governance-gap] tags: [evaluation-infrastructure, third-party-audit, AAL-framework, voluntary-collaborative, deception-resilient, governance-gap]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-19
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 2 claims, 2 rejected by validator"
--- ---
## Content ## Content
@ -56,3 +60,15 @@ PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[safe AI development requires building alignment mechanisms
WHY ARCHIVED: Most comprehensive description of the evaluation infrastructure field in early 2026. Defines the gap between current capability and what rigorous evaluation requires. The technical infeasibility of deception-resilient evaluation (AAL-3/4) is a major finding that strengthens B1's "not being treated as such" claim. WHY ARCHIVED: Most comprehensive description of the evaluation infrastructure field in early 2026. Defines the gap between current capability and what rigorous evaluation requires. The technical infeasibility of deception-resilient evaluation (AAL-3/4) is a major finding that strengthens B1's "not being treated as such" claim.
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the AAL framework structure, the technical infeasibility of AAL-3/4, and the voluntary-collaborative limitation. These three elements together describe the core gap in evaluation infrastructure. EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the AAL framework structure, the technical infeasibility of AAL-3/4, and the voluntary-collaborative limitation. These three elements together describe the core gap in evaluation infrastructure.
## Key Facts
- AAL-1 represents current peak practice: time-bounded system audits relying substantially on company-provided information
- AAL-2 is near-term goal: greater access to non-public information, less reliance on company statements, not yet standard
- AAL-3 and AAL-4 require deception-resilient verification and are currently not technically feasible
- METR and AISI currently perform AAL-1 level evaluations
- Paper has 28+ authors from 27 organizations including GovAI, MIT CSAIL, Cambridge, Stanford, Yale, Anthropic contributors, Epoch AI, Apollo Research
- Yoshua Bengio is a co-author
- Published January 2026, approximately 3 months after Anthropic RSP rollback
- Adoption model relies on market-based incentives: competitive procurement, insurance differentiation, audit credentials as competitive advantage
- Current adoption is voluntary and concentrated among a few developers with only emerging pilots