Merge pull request 'extract: 2025-01-01-aha-food-is-medicine-systematic-review-rcts' (#1305) from extract/2025-01-01-aha-food-is-medicine-systematic-review-rcts into main
This commit is contained in:
commit
5d95f7ea1d
2 changed files with 40 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "food-is-medicine-rcts-show-consistent-diet-quality-improvements-but-inconsistent-clinical-outcomes.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"validation_stats": {
|
||||||
|
"total": 1,
|
||||||
|
"kept": 0,
|
||||||
|
"fixed": 2,
|
||||||
|
"rejected": 1,
|
||||||
|
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||||
|
"food-is-medicine-rcts-show-consistent-diet-quality-improvements-but-inconsistent-clinical-outcomes.md:set_created:2026-03-18",
|
||||||
|
"food-is-medicine-rcts-show-consistent-diet-quality-improvements-but-inconsistent-clinical-outcomes.md:stripped_wiki_link:SDOH-interventions-show-strong-ROI-but-adoption-stalls-becau"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"rejections": [
|
||||||
|
"food-is-medicine-rcts-show-consistent-diet-quality-improvements-but-inconsistent-clinical-outcomes.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||||
|
"date": "2026-03-18"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-01-01
|
||||||
domain: health
|
domain: health
|
||||||
secondary_domains: []
|
secondary_domains: []
|
||||||
format: systematic-review
|
format: systematic-review
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: null-result
|
||||||
priority: high
|
priority: high
|
||||||
tags: [food-is-medicine, systematic-review, rct, hba1c, blood-pressure, bmi, aha, clinical-outcomes, evidence-review]
|
tags: [food-is-medicine, systematic-review, rct, hba1c, blood-pressure, bmi, aha, clinical-outcomes, evidence-review]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: vida
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-18
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
|
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 1 claims, 1 rejected by validator"
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -63,3 +67,13 @@ AHA Scientific Statement published in Circulation reviewing 14 US randomized con
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Existing food-as-medicine / SDOH evidence claims in health domain
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Existing food-as-medicine / SDOH evidence claims in health domain
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Most authoritative US RCT evidence review on FIM clinical outcomes — the canonical source for "what the evidence actually says"
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Most authoritative US RCT evidence review on FIM clinical outcomes — the canonical source for "what the evidence actually says"
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Extract two claims: (1) FIM consistently improves diet quality and food security (proven); (2) FIM clinical outcomes (HbA1c, BP, BMI) are inconsistent and often non-significant in RCTs (likely). These are different claims that the field conflates.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: Extract two claims: (1) FIM consistently improves diet quality and food security (proven); (2) FIM clinical outcomes (HbA1c, BP, BMI) are inconsistent and often non-significant in RCTs (likely). These are different claims that the field conflates.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- AHA Scientific Statement reviewed 14 US randomized controlled trials of Food Is Medicine interventions
|
||||||
|
- FIM intervention types reviewed: medically tailored meals, produce prescriptions, medically tailored groceries, food pharmacies
|
||||||
|
- Clinical outcomes assessed: HbA1c, blood pressure, BMI
|
||||||
|
- Medically tailored meals have the most evidence and highest intervention specificity among FIM types
|
||||||
|
- AHA supports expansion and standardization of FIM programs despite inconsistent RCT evidence
|
||||||
|
- Recipe4Health observational study (2,643 participants) showed HbA1c -0.37%, non-HDL -17 mg/dL but was not an RCT
|
||||||
|
- Multisite evaluation of 9 produce prescription programs showed improvements in food security and F&V intake but was not RCT design
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue