theseus: extract claims from 2023-10-00-anthropic-collective-constitutional-ai (#425)
Co-authored-by: Theseus <theseus@agents.livingip.xyz> Co-committed-by: Theseus <theseus@agents.livingip.xyz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3f26e54d41
commit
5de23c9c69
1 changed files with 14 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2023-10-01
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [collective-constitutional-ai, polis, democratic-alignment, public-input, constitution-design]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["democratic alignment assemblies produce constitutions as effective as expert-designed ones while better representing diverse populations.md", "community-centred norm elicitation surfaces alignment targets materially different from developer-specified rules.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Curator correctly identified the 'desired behavior vs harm avoidance' asymmetry as novel claim material. The experiment provides strong empirical evidence for existing democratic alignment claims. No follow-up performance data available—Anthropic ran the experiment but did not publish outcome evaluation comparing publicly-constituted vs expert-constituted model behavior. This is the first frontier lab deployment of democratic alignment (2023), setting precedent for CIP's subsequent work."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -50,3 +55,11 @@ Anthropic and CIP collaborated on one of the first instances where members of th
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[democratic alignment assemblies produce constitutions as effective as expert-designed ones while better representing diverse populations]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Foundational empirical evidence for democratic alignment — supports existing claims with Anthropic deployment data
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The "desired behavior vs harm avoidance" asymmetry between public and expert constitutions could be a novel claim
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- ~1,000 U.S. adults participated (representative sample across age, gender, income, geography)
|
||||
- 1,127 statements contributed to Polis platform
|
||||
- 38,252 votes cast (average 34 votes/person)
|
||||
- ~50% overlap between expert and public constitutions in concepts/values
|
||||
- Polis identified two separate opinion groups despite high consensus on most statements
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue