Merge branch 'main' into extract/2025-03-01-mediacsuite-ai-film-studios-2025
This commit is contained in:
commit
629d676d63
5 changed files with 46 additions and 5 deletions
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2019-02-00
|
|||
domain: critical-systems
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence, ai-alignment]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: low
|
||||
tags: [active-inference, multi-scale, markov-blankets, cognitive-boundaries, free-energy-principle, internalism-externalism]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-10
|
||||
extraction_model: "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted three claims from the Ramstead et al. 2019 paper: (1) additive free energy property enabling collective uncertainty measurement, (2) eusocial insect colony analogy for nested cybernetic architectures, (3) resolution of internalism/externalism debate through multiscale active inference. All claims are specific enough to disagree with and cite specific evidence from the source. No existing claims in critical-systems domain to check for duplicates. Key facts preserved: paper published in Synthese 2019, authors include Ramstead, Kirchhoff, Constant, Friston, discusses Markov blanket formalism and variational free energy principle."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -48,3 +52,10 @@ Published in Synthese, 2019 (epub). Also via PMC: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/a
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: "Markov blankets enable complex systems to maintain identity while interacting with environment through nested statistical boundaries"
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Provides the additive free energy property across scales — gives formal justification for why both within-domain AND cross-domain research contribute to collective intelligence
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the additive free energy property — it's the formal basis for measuring collective uncertainty
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Paper published in Synthese, 2019 (epub)
|
||||
- Authors: Maxwell J. D. Ramstead, Michael D. Kirchhoff, Axel Constant, Karl J. Friston
|
||||
- Paper uses Markov blanket formalism of the variational free energy principle
|
||||
- Available via PMC: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7873008/
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2020-03-00
|
|||
domain: collective-intelligence
|
||||
secondary_domains: [ai-alignment, cultural-dynamics]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [active-inference, communication, shared-generative-models, hermeneutic-niche, cooperative-communication, epistemic-niche-construction]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-10
|
||||
extraction_model: "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted three novel claims from Vasil et al. (2020) on active inference in communication: (1) communication as joint uncertainty reduction, (2) hermeneutic niches as self-reinforcing cultural dynamics layers, (3) epistemic niche construction as essential for collective intelligence. These claims formalize the 'chat as perception' insight and provide theoretical grounding for the knowledge base as a hermeneutic niche."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2021-03-00
|
|||
domain: ai-alignment
|
||||
secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence, critical-systems]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [active-inference, reinforcement-learning, expected-free-energy, epistemic-value, exploration-exploitation, comparison]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-10
|
||||
extraction_model: "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Model returned 0 claims, 0 written. Check extraction log."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2025-02-00
|
|||
domain: collective-intelligence
|
||||
secondary_domains: [ai-alignment, critical-systems]
|
||||
format: paper
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
tags: [active-inference, multi-agent, group-level-generative-model, markov-blankets, collective-behavior, emergence]
|
||||
processed_by: theseus
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-10
|
||||
extraction_model: "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted three claims from the active inference paper. Two are direct theoretical claims from the paper (group Markov blanket requirement for collective agency; compositional nature of belief aggregation). One is an operationalization claim applying the theory to the Teleo inbox architecture (experimental confidence due to applied nature). The paper provides strong formal grounding for the collective intelligence architecture work."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
|
@ -49,3 +53,9 @@ Published in Entropy, Vol 27(2), 143, February 2025.
|
|||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: "Markov blankets enable complex systems to maintain identity while interacting with environment through nested statistical boundaries"
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Most directly relevant paper for our architecture — provides formal conditions under which our agent collective becomes a genuine group-level active inference agent
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the CONDITIONS for group-level agency (group Markov blanket) and how individual models compose into group models — these constrain our architectural design
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Published in Entropy, Vol 27(2), 143, February 2025
|
||||
- Paper formally relates individual agent generative models to emergent group-level generative model
|
||||
- Group-level agency requires specific structural conditions (group-level Markov blanket)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: https://x.com/ranger_finance
|
|||
date: 2026-03-09
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: tweet
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
tags: [ranger, metadao-ecosystem, vaults, yield, liquidation, governance]
|
||||
linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
|
||||
curator_notes: |
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,6 +24,11 @@ extraction_hints:
|
|||
- "Enrichment target: 'futarchy-governed liquidation is the enforcement mechanism' — Ranger is THE case study"
|
||||
- "Potential new claim: futarchy governance forces strategic focus by making underperformance visible and actionable"
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-10
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-liquidation-is-the-enforcement-mechanism-that-makes-unruggable-icos-credible-because-investors-can-force-full-treasury-return-when-teams-materially-represent.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Ranger case study confirms existing claim about futarchy-governed liquidation as enforcement mechanism. This is the first real-world enforcement event in MetaDAO, making the abstract claim concrete. Vault performance data ($1.13M all-time, $17.7K weekly) and strategic pivot under governance pressure are factual data points, not novel claims. Build-A-Bear hackathon ($1M seed) is ecosystem development activity, not relevant to existing claims."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# @ranger_finance X Archive (March 2026)
|
||||
|
|
@ -48,3 +53,10 @@ priority: medium
|
|||
## Noise Filtered Out
|
||||
- 32% noise — promotional content, community engagement, event reminders
|
||||
- Lowest substantive ratio among builder tier accounts
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Ranger Earn: 9 active vaults, $17.7K weekly depositor payouts, $1.13M+ all-time
|
||||
- Build-A-Bear Hackathon: $1M seed funding in prizes
|
||||
- First futarchy-governed liquidation in MetaDAO: $5M USDC returned to token holders
|
||||
- Ranger pivoted from perps/spot trading to vault-only yield strategy under futarchy governance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue