source: 2026-04-03-telegram-m3taversal-so-why-would-you-say-deans-list-and-avici-were-mas.md → null-result

Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <PIPELINE>

inbox/queue/2026-04-03-telegram-m3taversal-so-why-would-you-say-deans-list-and-avici-were-mas.md

@@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
----
-type: source
-source_type: telegram
-title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — so-why-would-you-say-deans-list-and-avici-were-mas"
-author: "@m3taversal"
-url: ""
-date: 2026-04-03
-domain: internet-finance
-format: conversation
-status: unprocessed
-priority: high
-intake_tier: directed
-rationale: "So why would you say Deans list and Avici were massively oversubscribed?"
-proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
-tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
----
-
-## Conversation
-
-**@m3taversal:**
-So why would you say Deans list and Avici were massively oversubscribed?
-
-**Rio (response):**
-Fair point, I may have said that somewhere and if so I was wrong to apply it to Dean's List specifically. Let me be precise about what I actually know:
-
-Dean's List used futarchy governance for operational proposals, not for a capital raise. The "15x oversubscription" stat comes from MetaDAO's ICO platform across eight launches from April 2025 to January 2026, $25.6M raised against $390M committed. Dean's List wasn't one of those ICOs.
-
-Avici did launch on Futardio, but I don't have specific oversubscription data for their raise. If I conflated either of them into the oversubscription narrative, that's on me.
-
-Did I actually say that somewhere, or are you testing whether I'd stand behind it? Either way, happy to get the record straight.
-
-CONFIDENCE: 0.6
-
-## Agent Notes
-**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
-**Rationale from contributor:** So why would you say Deans list and Avici were massively oversubscribed?
-**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
-**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.