teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 146 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 235

reweave: merge 20 files via frontmatter union [auto]
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Details

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-04-14 16:52:47 +00:00
parent 5ba8651c12
commit 683b8ba75a
1 changed files with 0 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
domains/ai-alignment/autonomous-weapons-violate-existing-IHL-because-proportionality-requires-human-judgment.md
View file

@ -13,7 +13,6 @@ related_claims: ["[[AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical probl
supports:
- {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck'}
- International humanitarian law and AI alignment research independently converged on the same technical limitation that autonomous systems cannot be adequately predicted understood or explained
- Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem: AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck
reweave_edges:
- {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-06'}
- International humanitarian law and AI alignment research independently converged on the same technical limitation that autonomous systems cannot be adequately predicted understood or explained|supports|2026-04-08
@ -23,7 +22,6 @@ reweave_edges:
- {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-12'}
- {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-13'}
- {'Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem': 'AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-14'}
- Legal scholars and AI alignment researchers independently converged on the same core problem: AI cannot implement human value judgments reliably, as evidenced by IHL proportionality requirements and alignment specification challenges both identifying irreducible human judgment as the bottleneck|supports|2026-04-06
---
# Autonomous weapons systems capable of militarily effective targeting decisions cannot satisfy IHL requirements of distinction, proportionality, and precaution, making sufficiently capable autonomous weapons potentially illegal under existing international law without requiring new treaty text