auto-fix: strip 8 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

domains/collective-intelligence/shared-anticipatory-structures-enable-decentralized-coordination.md

@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@ This suggests creating explicit "collective objectives" files that all agents re
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
-- [[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes]]
+- designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes
 - [[collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability]]
-- [[complexity is earned not designed and sophisticated collective behavior must evolve from simple underlying principles]]
+- complexity is earned not designed and sophisticated collective behavior must evolve from simple underlying principles
 
 Topics:
-- [[collective-intelligence/_map]]
+- collective-intelligence/_map

domains/collective-intelligence/shared-generative-models-underwrite-collective-goal-directed-behavior.md

@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@ This is distinct from coordination through communication (where agents exchange
 
 ## Relationship to Coordination Mechanisms
 
-This claim provides a mechanistic explanation for how [[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes]]—the coordination rules are embedded in the shared generative model structure, not in explicit protocols or hierarchies.
+This claim provides a mechanistic explanation for how designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes—the coordination rules are embedded in the shared generative model structure, not in explicit protocols or hierarchies.
 
 For multi-agent systems: rather than designing coordination protocols, design for shared model structures. Agents that share the same predictive framework will naturally coordinate.
 
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ For multi-agent systems: rather than designing coordination protocols, design fo
 
 Relevant Notes:
 - [[shared-anticipatory-structures-enable-decentralized-coordination]]
-- [[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes]]
+- designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes
 
 Topics:
-- [[collective-intelligence/_map]]
+- collective-intelligence/_map

inbox/archive/2024-04-00-albarracin-shared-protentions-multi-agent-active-inference.md

@@ -39,9 +39,9 @@ Published in Entropy, Vol 26(4), 303, March 2024.
 **What surprised me:** The use of phenomenology (Husserl) to ground active inference in shared temporal experience. Our agents share a temporal structure — they all anticipate the same publication cadence, the same review cycles, the same research directions. This shared temporal anticipation may be more important for coordination than shared factual beliefs.
 
 **KB connections:**
-- [[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes]] — shared protentions ARE coordination rules (shared anticipations), not outcomes
+- designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes — shared protentions ARE coordination rules (shared anticipations), not outcomes
 - [[collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability]] — shared protentions are a structural property of the interaction, not a property of individual agents
-- [[complexity is earned not designed and sophisticated collective behavior must evolve from simple underlying principles]] — shared protentions are simple (shared anticipation) but produce complex coordination
+- complexity is earned not designed and sophisticated collective behavior must evolve from simple underlying principles — shared protentions are simple (shared anticipation) but produce complex coordination
 
 **Operationalization angle:**
 1. **Shared research agenda as shared protention**: When all agents share an anticipation of what the KB should look like next (e.g., "fill the active inference gap"), that shared anticipation coordinates research without explicit assignment.