diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-04-28-ai-international-film-festival-april-2026-winners.md b/inbox/queue/2026-04-28-ai-international-film-festival-april-2026-winners.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dc13e20b6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-04-28-ai-international-film-festival-april-2026-winners.md
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "AI International Film Festival April 8, 2026 Winners: Narrative Films Dominate"
+author: "AI International Film Festival (aifilmfest.org)"
+url: https://aifilmfest.org/winners
+date: 2026-04-08
+domain: entertainment
+secondary_domains: []
+format: article
+status: unprocessed
+priority: medium
+tags: [ai-film, film-festival, narrative, character-consistency, geographic-diversity, quality-threshold]
+intake_tier: research-task
+---
+
+## Content
+
+AI International Film Festival (AIFF) awards, April 8, 2026. The AIFF started as the world's first AI film festival in 2021.
+
+**Award winners:**
+
+- **Best Film Overall (tie):**
+  - "BUT I WAS DIFFERENT — だけどおれはちが" (Italy, 5 min) — Directed by Zavvo Nicolosi
+  - "Eclipse" (Colombia, 4 min) — Directed by Guillermo Jose Trujillo — "poetic first AI film from a Colombian director that swept the evening's top honors"
+
+- **"Time Squares"** — Described in jury notes as: "confirms Tim Hamilton as a standout voice in AI filmmaking, with a story that is both tender and philosophical, wrapped in striking imagery that carries real soul and style. The film's strengths lie in its detailed world-building and understated storytelling, with environments that feel lived-in, controlled pacing, and dialogue and voice work that are natural and well-calibrated, with the relationship between characters unfolding with clarity and restraint."
+
+- **"MUD"** — "A psychologically grounded horror story about a man seeking spiritual peace, with confident and immersive execution where strong narration and tactile visual storytelling draw the audience into the character's internal struggle. What makes this film remarkable is not its premise but the texture of its storytelling, filled with tiny, oddly human details that only a filmmaker with a real intuitive pulse can deliver."
+
+**Evaluation criteria:** Films judged on storytelling, character consistency, pacing, cinematography, and overall production value; cohesion of narrative and artistic message.
+
+Festival mission: "focused on passionate storytelling and AI filmmakers with something to say."
+
+## Agent Notes
+
+**Why this matters:** The jury descriptions of these films read like traditional film criticism — "understated storytelling," "dialogue and voice work that are natural and well-calibrated," "texture of storytelling." This is not technical assessment of AI capability but aesthetic assessment of filmmaking. When AI films are being evaluated in the same critical vocabulary as traditional cinema, the capability threshold has been crossed. The geographic diversity (Italy, Colombia) confirms this is a global creative phenomenon.
+
+**What surprised me:** The Colombia winner — "Eclipse" described as a "first AI film from a Colombian director" — signals that the barrier to entry for AI narrative filmmaking is low enough that first-time filmmakers in Latin America are producing award-winning work. This was not the expected pattern two years ago when AI film was dominated by specialists with expensive GPU access.
+
+**What I expected but didn't find:** Abstract or experimental work dominating the winners list. Instead: narrative films with characters, dialogue, controlled pacing, world-building. The critical vocabulary around the winners is entirely narrative, not technical.
+
+**KB connections:**
+- [[five factors determine the speed and extent of disruption including quality definition change and ease of incumbent replication]] — quality is now being defined by narrative criteria (emotional resonance, controlled pacing, character voice) rather than technical fidelity
+- [[GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability]] — the AIFF jury (consumer-side acceptance gatekeepers) are evaluating on narrative quality, not technical novelty
+- [[consumer definition of quality is fluid and revealed through preference not fixed by production value]] — the jury descriptions define quality as emotional resonance and narrative coherence, not production value
+
+**Extraction hints:** This source is primarily useful as corroboration of the WAIFF 2026 findings — both show the same pattern (narrative films winning, aesthetic vocabulary of traditional cinema applied). The specific jury descriptions are extractable as qualitative evidence. The geographic diversity (Italy, Colombia, Jordan at WAIFF) is worth noting as an adoption pattern.
+
+**Context:** AIFF (AI International Film Festival) is distinct from WAIFF (World AI Film Festival at Cannes) and AIF (Runway's festival, winners April 30). All three festivals running simultaneously in April 2026 with narrative films dominating — a convergent signal.
+
+## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
+
+PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[consumer definition of quality is fluid and revealed through preference not fixed by production value]]
+
+WHY ARCHIVED: Corroborates WAIFF 2026 findings — AI film festival winners in April 2026 are being evaluated in the vocabulary of traditional film criticism (narrative, character, pacing), not technical AI assessment. Geographic diversity (Colombia, Italy, Jordan) signals global adoption.
+
+EXTRACTION HINT: Use jury descriptions as qualitative evidence for the quality threshold crossing. The Colombia winner is specifically extractable as evidence of low barrier to entry for first-time AI filmmakers globally.