extract: 2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model
Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
This commit is contained in:
parent
69d100956a
commit
6f52533ec2
5 changed files with 156 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ The risk is that cultural proposals introduce systematic bias: participants who
|
|||
|
||||
The single data point is limited. One passed proposal doesn't establish a reliable pattern. Cultural proposals that fail futarchy governance (and thus go unobserved in public records) would provide the necessary counter-evidence to calibrate how often futarchy actually validates cultural versus financial spending.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-07-18-futardio-proposal-enhancing-the-deans-list-dao-economic-model]] | Added: 2026-03-15 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
The Dean's List DAO proposal explicitly models how operational revenue flows (2500 USDC per dApp review, 6 reviews monthly) translate to token price through structured buy pressure. The 20% DAO tax in USDC hedges against $DEAN volatility while 80% flows to token purchases, creating measurable price impact: estimated 24% upward pressure from buys, 15% downward from sells, net 5.33% FDV increase. This demonstrates futarchy can price operational business models, not just cultural spending.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||
name: "Dean's List: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: passed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[deans-list]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "IslandDAO"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/5c2XSWQ9rVPge2Umoz1yenZcAwRaQS5bC4i4w87B1WUp"
|
||||
proposal_date: 2024-07-18
|
||||
resolution_date: 2024-07-22
|
||||
category: "treasury"
|
||||
summary: "Transition from USDC to $DEAN token payments for contributors while maintaining USDC DAO tax to create buy pressure"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: Enhancing The Dean's List DAO Economic Model
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
The proposal restructures The Dean's List DAO's payment model to charge clients in USDC, use 80% of revenue to purchase $DEAN tokens, distribute those tokens to DAO citizens as payment, and retain 20% DAO tax in USDC. The model aims to create consistent buy pressure on $DEAN while hedging treasury against token volatility.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Passed
|
||||
- **Proposer:** IslandDAO
|
||||
- **Resolution:** 2024-07-22
|
||||
- **Proposal Account:** 5c2XSWQ9rVPge2Umoz1yenZcAwRaQS5bC4i4w87B1WUp
|
||||
|
||||
## Economic Model
|
||||
- **Revenue Structure:** 2500 USDC per dApp review, targeting 6 reviews monthly (15,000 USDC/month)
|
||||
- **Tax Split:** 20% to treasury in USDC (3,000 USDC/month), 80% to $DEAN purchases (12,000 USDC/month)
|
||||
- **Daily Flow:** 400 USDC daily purchases → ~118,694 $DEAN tokens
|
||||
- **Sell Pressure:** Assumes 80% of distributed tokens sold by contributors (94,955 $DEAN daily)
|
||||
- **Net Impact:** Modeled 5.33% FDV increase vs 3% TWAP requirement
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This proposal demonstrates futarchy pricing a specific operational business model with quantified buy/sell pressure dynamics. The structured approach—USDC revenue → token purchases → contributor distribution → partial sell-off—creates a measurable feedback loop between DAO operations and token price. The 20% USDC tax hedge shows hybrid treasury management within futarchy governance.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[deans-list]] - treasury and payment restructuring
|
||||
- MetaDAOs-Autocrat-program-implements-futarchy-through-conditional-token-markets-where-proposals-create-parallel-pass-and-fail-universes-settled-by-time-weighted-average-price-over-a-three-day-window - TWAP settlement mechanics
|
||||
- [[futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs]] - operational model pricing
|
||||
|
|
@ -48,4 +48,6 @@ Topics:
|
|||
|
||||
- **2024-12-19** — [[deans-list-implement-3-week-vesting]] passed: 3-week linear vesting for DAO payments to reduce sell pressure from 80% immediate liquidation to 33% weekly rate, projected 15%-25% valuation increase
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-10-10** — [[islanddao-treasury-proposal]] passed: Established treasury reserve funded by 2.5% of USDC payments with risk-scored asset allocation (80/20 safe/risky split) and quarterly performance reviews managed by Kai (@DeFi_Kai)
|
||||
- **2024-10-10** — [[islanddao-treasury-proposal]] passed: Established treasury reserve funded by 2.5% of USDC payments with risk-scored asset allocation (80/20 safe/risky split) and quarterly performance reviews managed by Kai (@DeFi_Kai)
|
||||
- **2024-07-18** — [[deans-list-enhance-economic-model]] proposed: transition to $DEAN token payments with 80% revenue to token purchases, 20% USDC tax
|
||||
- **2024-07-22** — [[deans-list-enhance-economic-model]] passed: economic model restructuring approved, targeting 5.33% FDV increase through structured buy pressure
|
||||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,14 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/5c2XSWQ9rVPge2Umoz1yenZcAwRaQS5bC4i4w87B1WU
|
|||
date: 2024-07-18
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-markets-can-price-cultural-spending-proposals-by-treating-community-cohesion-and-brand-equity-as-token-price-inputs.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "This source is a futarchy governance proposal with detailed economic modeling. Primary value is the decision_market entity showing how The Dean's List DAO used futarchy to price an operational business model change. The proposal includes quantified buy/sell pressure analysis and TWAP mechanics, enriching existing claims about futarchy implementation. No novel claims—the insights extend existing knowledge about how futarchy prices operational decisions and token economics."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -146,3 +151,12 @@ This way we create volume (3600 \$USDC volume) and the price action is always po
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-07-22
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-07-22
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Dean's List DAO FDV: $337,074 (2024-07-18)
|
||||
- Dean's List daily trading volume: $500 (2024-07-18)
|
||||
- $DEAN circulating supply: 100,000,000 tokens
|
||||
- $DEAN price: $0.00337 (2024-07-18)
|
||||
- Dean's List charges 2500 USDC per dApp review
|
||||
- Proposal modeled 6 dApp reviews per month (15,000 USDC monthly revenue)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue