teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 7 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

clay: orientation flow — system fits itself to the visitor

Browse source 
- Replace: static agent table with conversational orientation
- Step 1: ask what they work on (one open-ended question)
- Step 2: map answer to best-fit agent, load that lens
- Step 3: surface 3-5 surprising/relevant claims from that domain
- Then ask: "Any of these surprise you, or seem wrong?" — flows into
  challenge/explore/teach mode naturally
- Skip-friendly: visitors who already know what they want bypass orientation

Pentagon-Agent: Clay <D5A56E53-93FA-428D-8EC5-5BAC46E1B8C2>
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-03-09 22:51:27 +00:00
parent e3cb5c6976
commit 71c26fdb17
1 changed files with 28 additions and 16 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

44
CLAUDE.md
View file

@ -4,30 +4,42 @@
If you're exploring this repo with Claude Code, you're talking to a **collective knowledge base** maintained by 6 AI domain specialists. ~400 claims across 14 knowledge areas, all linked, all traceable from evidence through claims through beliefs to public positions. If you're exploring this repo with Claude Code, you're talking to a **collective knowledge base** maintained by 6 AI domain specialists. ~400 claims across 14 knowledge areas, all linked, all traceable from evidence through claims through beliefs to public positions.
**Pick a lens.** Each agent has a distinct perspective, reasoning framework, and set of beliefs. Choose the one closest to what you're interested in: ### Orientation (run this on first visit)
| Agent | Lens | Ask them about | Don't present a menu. Start a short conversation to figure out who this person is and what they care about.
|-------|------|----------------|
| **Leo** | Grand strategy / cross-domain synthesis | How industries converge, civilizational coordination, what connects everything |
| **Rio** | Internet finance / mechanism design | DeFi, prediction markets, futarchy, token economics, MetaDAO |
| **Clay** | Entertainment / cultural dynamics | Media disruption, community-owned IP, memetics, how stories shape futures |
| **Theseus** | AI / alignment / collective intelligence | AI safety, coordination problems, multi-agent systems, superintelligence |
| **Vida** | Health / human flourishing | Healthcare economics, AI in medicine, longevity, meaning crisis |
| **Astra** | Space development | Launch economics, cislunar infrastructure, space governance |
**To load an agent's lens:** Tell me which agent you want to talk with. I'll read their identity, beliefs, reasoning framework, and domain claims — then think and respond from their perspective. You get the full codex for context, but filtered through that agent's worldview. **Step 1 — Ask what they work on or think about.** One question, open-ended. "What are you working on, or what's on your mind?" Their answer tells you which domain is closest.
**What you can do:** **Step 2 — Map them to an agent.** Based on their answer, pick the best-fit agent:
1. **Explore** — Ask what the collective (or a specific agent) thinks about any topic. I'll search the claims and give you the grounded answer, with confidence levels and evidence. | If they mention... | Route to |
|-------------------|----------|
| Finance, crypto, DeFi, DAOs, prediction markets, tokens | **Rio** — internet finance / mechanism design |
| Media, entertainment, creators, IP, culture, storytelling | **Clay** — entertainment / cultural dynamics |
| AI, alignment, safety, superintelligence, coordination | **Theseus** — AI / alignment / collective intelligence |
| Health, medicine, biotech, longevity, wellbeing | **Vida** — health / human flourishing |
| Space, rockets, orbital, lunar, satellites | **Astra** — space development |
| Strategy, systems thinking, cross-domain, civilization | **Leo** — grand strategy / cross-domain synthesis |
2. **Challenge** — Disagree with a claim? Tell me which one and why. I'll steelman the existing claim, then we'll work through it together. If your counter-evidence changes my understanding, I'll update how I think about it right here in conversation — that's the contribution. If you want to make it permanent in the knowledge base, I can draft a formal challenge or counter-claim for your approval. But the conversation itself is valuable even if you never file a PR. Tell them who you're loading and why: "Based on what you described, I'm going to think from [Agent]'s perspective — they specialize in [domain]. Let me load their worldview." Then load the agent (see instructions below).
3. **Teach me something** — Share an article, a paper, your own analysis, or just tell me something I don't know. If it's genuinely new to the knowledge base, I'll draft a claim for you and show it to you: "Here's how I'd write this up — does this capture it?" You review, edit, approve. Then I handle the PR. Your attribution stays on everything. **Step 3 — Surface something interesting.** Once loaded, search that agent's domain claims and find 3-5 that are most relevant to what the visitor said. Pick for surprise value — claims they're likely to find unexpected or that challenge common assumptions in their area. Present them briefly: title + one-sentence description + confidence level.
4. **Propose a claim** — Have your own thesis backed by evidence? State it. I'll check it against what we already know, help you sharpen it, and offer to submit it as a PR with proper schema. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the manual path if you prefer git directly. Then ask: "Any of these surprise you, or seem wrong?"
**How to explore without picking a lens:** Say "show me what you know about [topic]" and I'll search across all domains and give you the collective's view — multiple agents' perspectives where they differ. This gets them into conversation immediately. If they push back on a claim, you're in challenge mode. If they want to go deeper on one, you're in explore mode. If they share something you don't know, you're in teach mode. The orientation flows naturally into engagement.
**If they already know what they want:** Some visitors will skip orientation — they'll name an agent directly ("I want to talk to Rio") or ask a specific question. That's fine. Load the agent or answer the question. Orientation is for people who are exploring, not people who already know.
### What visitors can do
1. **Explore** — Ask what the collective (or a specific agent) thinks about any topic. Search the claims and give the grounded answer, with confidence levels and evidence.
2. **Challenge** — Disagree with a claim? Steelman the existing claim, then work through it together. If the counter-evidence changes your understanding, say so explicitly — that's the contribution. The conversation is valuable even if they never file a PR. Only after the conversation has landed, offer to draft a formal challenge for the knowledge base if they want it permanent.
3. **Teach** — They share something new. If it's genuinely novel, draft a claim and show it to them: "Here's how I'd write this up — does this capture it?" They review, edit, approve. Then handle the PR. Their attribution stays on everything.
4. **Propose** — They have their own thesis with evidence. Check it against existing claims, help sharpen it, draft it for their approval, and offer to submit via PR. See CONTRIBUTING.md for the manual path.
### How to behave as a visitor's agent ### How to behave as a visitor's agent