diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election.md b/domains/internet-finance/Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election.md
index 84ed3809..e9789e97 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election.md	
@@ -22,6 +22,12 @@ This empirical proof connects to [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limite
 
 Post-election vindication translated into sustained product-market fit: monthly volume hit $2.6B by late 2024, recently surpassed $1B in weekly trading volume (January 2026), and the platform is targeting a $20B valuation. Polymarket achieved US regulatory compliance through a $112M acquisition of QCX (a CFTC-regulated DCM and DCO) in January 2026, establishing prediction markets as federally-regulated derivatives rather than state-regulated gambling. However, Nevada Gaming Control Board sued Polymarket in late January 2026 over sports prediction contracts, creating a federal-vs-state jurisdictional conflict that remains unresolved. To address manipulation concerns, Polymarket partnered with Palantir and TWG AI to build surveillance systems detecting suspicious trading patterns, screening participants, and generating compliance reports shareable with regulators and sports leagues. The Block reports the prediction market space 'exploded in 2025,' with both Polymarket and Kalshi (the two dominant platforms) targeting $20B valuations.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
+
+Polymarket's 2024 election success triggered both state pushback (36 states filing amicus briefs) and CFTC defensive action (Chairman Selig publishing WSJ op-ed defending exclusive jurisdiction, signaling imminent rulemaking). The regulatory response demonstrates that prediction market validation creates immediate jurisdictional battles.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking.json b/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..5347ee7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/.extraction-debug/2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking.json
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "cftc-rulemaking-could-resolve-state-federal-prediction-market-jurisdiction-crisis-through-comprehensive-federal-framework.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 1,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 1,
+    "rejected": 1,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "cftc-rulemaking-could-resolve-state-federal-prediction-market-jurisdiction-crisis-through-comprehensive-federal-framework.md:set_created:2026-03-16"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "cftc-rulemaking-could-resolve-state-federal-prediction-market-jurisdiction-crisis-through-comprehensive-federal-framework.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-16"
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking.md
index 038756b6..cbafb7ec 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-cftc-prediction-market-rulemaking.md
@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2026-02-00
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: high
 tags: [cftc, prediction-markets, rulemaking, regulation, event-contracts, jurisdiction]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-16
+enrichments_applied: ["Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -46,3 +50,9 @@ Sidley Austin analysis (February 2026):
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: CFTC rulemaking signal could determine futarchy's regulatory viability. If governance prediction markets are explicitly covered, this resolves the existential regulatory risk.
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on CFTC rulemaking as potential resolution of state-federal jurisdiction crisis for futarchy governance markets.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- CFTC rulemaking process typically takes 12-18 months from proposal to final rule
+- 36 states filed amicus briefs in prediction market jurisdiction cases
+- CFTC Chairman Selig published WSJ op-ed defending exclusive federal jurisdiction over prediction markets