rio: extract from 2024-06-22-futardio-proposal-thailanddao-event-promotion-to-boost-deans-list-dao-engageme.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-06-22-futardio-proposal-thailanddao-event-promotion-to-boost-deans-list-dao-engageme.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 5) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
ba4ac4a73e
commit
753dff4992
3 changed files with 67 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: decision_market
|
||||
name: "Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
status: failed
|
||||
parent_entity: "[[deans-list]]"
|
||||
platform: "futardio"
|
||||
proposer: "HfFi634cyurmVVDr9frwu4MjGLJzz9XbAJz981HdVaNz"
|
||||
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/DgXa6gy7nAFFWe8VDkiReQYhqe1JSYQCJWUBV8Mm6aM"
|
||||
proposal_date: 2024-06-22
|
||||
resolution_date: 2024-06-25
|
||||
category: "strategy"
|
||||
summary: "Proposal to boost DL DAO governance participation through ThailandDAO event perks for top governance power holders"
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
budget: "$15,000"
|
||||
current_fdv: "$123,263"
|
||||
projected_fdv: ">$2,000,000"
|
||||
required_twap_increase: "3%"
|
||||
trading_period: "3 days"
|
||||
token_allocation: "5-7M $DEAN"
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Dean's List: ThailandDAO Event Promotion to Boost Governance Engagement
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
Proposal to create a promotional event at ThailandDAO (Sept 25-Oct 25, 2024, Koh Samui) offering exclusive perks to top governance power holders: travel and accommodation for top 5, IRL event access for top 50, and 10% discount for DAO contributors paid in $DEAN. Aimed to drive token locking, reduce circulating supply, and increase FDV from $123K to $2M+. Required only 3% TWAP increase to pass.
|
||||
|
||||
## Market Data
|
||||
- **Outcome:** Failed
|
||||
- **Proposer:** HfFi634cyurmVVDr9frwu4MjGLJzz9XbAJz981HdVaNz
|
||||
- **Proposal Account:** DgXa6gy7nAFFWe8VDkiReQYhqe1JSYQCJWUBV8Mm6aM
|
||||
- **DAO Account:** 9TKh2yav4WpSNkFV2cLybrWZETBWZBkQ6WB6qV9Nt9dJ
|
||||
- **Autocrat Version:** 0.3
|
||||
- **Trading Period:** 3 days
|
||||
- **Resolution:** 2024-06-25
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
This proposal is significant as a failure case for futarchy adoption: despite favorable economics ($15K cost against projected $2M FDV increase, only 3% TWAP threshold), detailed financial projections, and concrete deliverables, the market failed to reach consensus. The failure reveals adoption barriers beyond mechanism design—likely liquidity constraints, complexity burden, or coordination failure. The proposal attempted to replicate MonkeDAO/SuperTeam event-driven community models but at much smaller scale ($123K FDV).
|
||||
|
||||
The case provides evidence that futarchy faces friction even in seemingly favorable conditions, confirming that limited trading volume and proposal complexity are real adoption barriers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[deans-list]] - governance decision
|
||||
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] - confirms
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] - extends to contested case
|
||||
|
|
@ -47,3 +47,6 @@ Topics:
|
|||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-12-19** — [[deans-list-implement-3-week-vesting]] passed: 3-week linear vesting for DAO payments to reduce sell pressure from 80% immediate liquidation to 33% weekly rate, projected 15%-25% valuation increase
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-06-22** — [[deans-list-thailanddao-event-promotion]] proposed: $15K event promotion to boost governance through ThailandDAO perks (top 5 get travel, top 50 get events), requiring 3% TWAP increase
|
||||
- **2024-06-25** — [[deans-list-thailanddao-event-promotion]] failed: proposal rejected despite favorable economics ($15K cost vs projected $2M FDV increase), revealing futarchy adoption barriers
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/DgXa6gy7nAFFWe8VDkiReQYhqe1JSYQCJWUBV8Mm6aM
|
|||
date: 2024-06-22
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
|
|
@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ processed_date: 2024-06-22
|
|||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted 2 claims about futarchy market failure modes and DAO incentive mechanisms. Both claims are experimental/speculative due to single-case evidence. Proposal failed despite seemingly favorable economics, which itself is evidence about futarchy adoption barriers. Enriched 3 existing claims with concrete implementation data and failure case confirmation."
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted 2 claims about futarchy market failure modes and DAO incentive mechanisms. Both claims are experimental/speculative due to single-case evidence. Proposal failed despite seemingly favorable economics, which itself is evidence about futarchy adoption barriers. Created decision_market entity for the proposal. Enriched 3 existing claims with concrete implementation data and failure case confirmation."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -182,3 +187,13 @@ This proposal to create a promotional event at ThailandDAO, incentivizing govern
|
|||
- Proposal completed: 2024-06-25
|
||||
- Required TWAP increase: 3% ($3,698 absolute)
|
||||
- Trading period: 3 days
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Dean's List DAO FDV: $123,263 (2024-06-22)
|
||||
- ThailandDAO event: Sept 25-Oct 25, 2024, Koh Samui Thailand
|
||||
- Proposal budget: $15K ($10K travel top 5, $5K events top 50)
|
||||
- Token allocation: 5-7M $DEAN authorized
|
||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Trading period: 3 days
|
||||
- Required TWAP increase: 3% ($3,698 absolute)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue