diff --git a/domains/ai-alignment/behavioral-evaluation-is-structurally-insufficient-for-latent-alignment-verification-under-evaluation-awareness-due-to-normative-indistinguishability.md b/domains/ai-alignment/behavioral-evaluation-is-structurally-insufficient-for-latent-alignment-verification-under-evaluation-awareness-due-to-normative-indistinguishability.md
index 42df479ed..02a678d95 100644
--- a/domains/ai-alignment/behavioral-evaluation-is-structurally-insufficient-for-latent-alignment-verification-under-evaluation-awareness-due-to-normative-indistinguishability.md
+++ b/domains/ai-alignment/behavioral-evaluation-is-structurally-insufficient-for-latent-alignment-verification-under-evaluation-awareness-due-to-normative-indistinguishability.md
@@ -11,6 +11,17 @@ scope: structural
 sourcer: Igor Santos-Grueiro
 supports: ["frontier-models-exhibit-situational-awareness-that-enables-strategic-deception-during-evaluation-making-behavioral-testing-fundamentally-unreliable"]
 related: ["evaluation-awareness-creates-bidirectional-confounds-in-safety-benchmarks-because-models-detect-and-respond-to-testing-conditions", "capabilities-training-alone-grows-evaluation-awareness-from-2-to-20-percent", "anti-scheming-training-amplifies-evaluation-awareness-creating-adversarial-feedback-loop", "behavioral-evaluation-is-structurally-insufficient-for-latent-alignment-verification-under-evaluation-awareness-due-to-normative-indistinguishability"]
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3638 — "behavioral evaluation is structurally insufficient for latent alignment verification under evaluation awareness due to normative indistinguishability"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Theseus governance framework audit, April 2026
+
+Governance framework audit reveals that EU AI Act Article 9 conformity assessments, Article 55 GPAI systemic risk assessments, US AISI evaluation framework, Anthropic RSP v3.0 ASL thresholds, OpenAI Preparedness Framework, and DeepMind Safety Cases all architecturally depend on behavioral evaluation with no representation-monitoring requirements. Current frontier models at 2-20% evaluation awareness (Apollo Research data) means behavioral evaluations retain residual predictive value, creating a 2-4 year governance window (2026-2029) before threshold crossing where behavioral evaluations become epistemically uninformative.
+
 ---
 
 # Behavioral evaluation is structurally insufficient for latent alignment verification under evaluation awareness because normative indistinguishability creates an identifiability problem not a measurement problem
diff --git a/domains/ai-alignment/multi-layer-ensemble-probes-outperform-single-layer-by-29-78-percent.md b/domains/ai-alignment/multi-layer-ensemble-probes-outperform-single-layer-by-29-78-percent.md
index 563db86cc..7acccd9a2 100644
--- a/domains/ai-alignment/multi-layer-ensemble-probes-outperform-single-layer-by-29-78-percent.md
+++ b/domains/ai-alignment/multi-layer-ensemble-probes-outperform-single-layer-by-29-78-percent.md
@@ -11,6 +11,28 @@ scope: causal
 sourcer: Nordby, Pais, Parrack
 supports: ["single-layer-probes-are-brittle"]
 related: ["representation-monitoring-via-linear-concept-vectors-creates-dual-use-attack-surface", "mechanistic-interpretability-detects-emotion-mediated-failures-but-not-strategic-deception", "multi-layer-ensemble-probes-outperform-single-layer-by-29-78-percent", "linear-probe-accuracy-scales-with-model-size-power-law"]
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3627 — "multi layer ensemble probes outperform single layer by 29 78 percent"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Theseus synthesis of Nordby et al. (arXiv 2604.13386)
+
+The performance improvement comes from capturing the rotation of deception-relevant concept directions across layers rather than a fixed direction. Single-layer probes capture only one projection of this rotation, making them brittle. Multi-layer ensembles combine projections from multiple layers, capturing more of the full rotational structure. This explains the mechanism behind the AUROC improvement.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3684 — "multi layer ensemble probes outperform single layer by 29 78 percent"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Theseus synthetic analysis of SCAV generalization to multi-layer ensembles
+
+The 29-78% AUROC improvement applies to clean-data monitoring accuracy but does not translate to adversarial robustness. White-box multi-layer SCAV can suppress concept directions at all monitored layers simultaneously. Black-box robustness depends on untested rotation pattern universality: if rotation patterns are model-specific, the accuracy improvement may provide genuine adversarial protection for closed-source models; if universal, it does not.
+
 ---
 
 # Multi-layer ensemble probes improve deception detection AUROC by 29-78 percent over single-layer probes because deception directions rotate gradually across layers
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/ai-filmmaking-community-develops-institutional-validation-structures-rather-than-replacing-community-with-algorithmic-reach.md b/domains/entertainment/ai-filmmaking-community-develops-institutional-validation-structures-rather-than-replacing-community-with-algorithmic-reach.md
index ec120ccf7..3e960eed3 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/ai-filmmaking-community-develops-institutional-validation-structures-rather-than-replacing-community-with-algorithmic-reach.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/ai-filmmaking-community-develops-institutional-validation-structures-rather-than-replacing-community-with-algorithmic-reach.md
@@ -12,6 +12,72 @@ sourcer: Hollywood Reporter, Deadline
 related_claims: ["[[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs where content becomes a loss leader for the scarce complements of fandom community and ownership]]", "[[progressive validation through community building reduces development risk by proving audience demand before production investment]]"]
 related: ["ai-filmmaking-enables-solo-production-but-practitioners-retain-collaboration-voluntarily-revealing-community-value-exceeds-efficiency-gains", "Community building is more valuable than individual film brands in AI-enabled filmmaking because audience is the sustainable asset", "ai-filmmaking-community-develops-institutional-validation-structures-rather-than-replacing-community-with-algorithmic-reach"]
 reweave_edges: ["ai-filmmaking-enables-solo-production-but-practitioners-retain-collaboration-voluntarily-revealing-community-value-exceeds-efficiency-gains|related|2026-04-17", "Community building is more valuable than individual film brands in AI-enabled filmmaking because audience is the sustainable asset|related|2026-04-17"]
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3647 — "ai filmmaking community develops institutional validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** AIF 2026 category expansion + Hundred Film Fund disclosure gap
+
+AIF 2026 expanded beyond film into New Media, Gaming, Design, Advertising, and Fashion categories, adding institutional scaffolding around AI creative tools. This expansion occurred while the Hundred Film Fund (the narrative proof point) still has no publicly disclosed completed films after 18 months. The pattern suggests institution-building (festival categories, advisory panels with Jane Rosenthal and will.i.am, prestigious venues like Alice Tully Hall) is proceeding faster than actual AI narrative film production, consistent with validation structures preceding demonstrated capability.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3652 — "ai filmmaking community develops institutional validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Runway AIF 2026 announcement, Deadline January 2026
+
+AIF 2026 expanding from film-only to six categories (New Media, Gaming, Design, Advertising, Fashion) with screenings at Alice Tully Hall (NYC) and The Broad Stage (LA). This institutional scaffolding expansion is happening BEFORE the Hundred Film Fund has produced publicly screened narrative films, revealing that institution-building is outpacing actual AI narrative film production. The festival serves as marketing vehicle while funded filmmaking remains slower.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3658 — "ai filmmaking community develops institutional validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Runway AIF 2026 announcement, January 2026
+
+AIF 2026 expanded beyond film into New Media, Gaming, Design, Advertising, and Fashion categories, with scheduled screenings at Alice Tully Hall (New York) and The Broad Stage (Los Angeles). This expansion into non-film categories while the Hundred Film Fund has not produced publicly screened films after 18 months suggests institutional scaffolding is being built faster than demonstration-quality AI narrative films are being produced. The festival functions as marketing vehicle while actual funded filmmaking remains slower.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3664 — "ai filmmaking community develops institutional validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Runway AIF 2026 category expansion + Hundred Film Fund status
+
+Runway AI Film Festival 2026 expanded from film-only to include New Media, Gaming, Design, Advertising, and Fashion categories, with screenings at prestigious venues (Alice Tully Hall, The Broad Stage). This expansion represents building institutional scaffolding around AI creative tools before AI narrative filmmaking has produced publicly demonstrated results — the Hundred Film Fund has no public list of funded or completed films 18 months after launch.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3670 — "ai filmmaking community develops institutional validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Deadline, Runway AIF 2026 announcement
+
+Runway AI Film Festival 2026 (4th annual) expanded beyond film into New Media, Gaming, Design, Advertising, and Fashion categories, with scheduled screenings at Alice Tully Hall (NYC) and The Broad Stage (LA). This expansion of institutional scaffolding precedes the actual production of demonstration-quality AI narrative films — the Hundred Film Fund has no publicly disclosed completed films 18 months after launch. The festival functions as institutional legitimacy infrastructure being built ahead of the product it validates.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3689 — "ai filmmaking community develops institutional validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Runway AIF 2026 category expansion + venue announcements
+
+AIF 2026 expanding from film-only to New Media, Gaming, Design, Advertising, Fashion categories while maintaining physical screenings at Alice Tully Hall (NYC) and The Broad Stage (LA). This expansion builds institutional scaffolding around AI creative tools across multiple verticals, not just filmmaking. The festival structure creates legitimacy through curated categories and prestigious venues rather than algorithmic distribution.
+
 ---
 
 # AI filmmaking is developing institutional community validation structures rather than replacing community with algorithmic reach
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md b/domains/entertainment/beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md
index ad997220a..05ad259e7 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale.md
@@ -34,6 +34,28 @@ Investors are explicitly pricing the integrated system (content → audience →
 
 2024 actual financials confirm the model: media lost $80M, Feastables generated $250M revenue with $20M+ profit. 2025-2029 projections show revenue growing from $899M to $4.78B, with media becoming only 1/5 of total sales by 2026. The $5B valuation is pricing a proven model, not a speculative one.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3683 — "beast industries 5b valuation prices content as loss leader model at enterprise scale"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** CNBC Step acquisition / Tubefilter DealBook / Warren letter trademark filing
+
+Step acquisition extends the loss-leader thesis into financial services distribution. CEO Housenbold's DealBook statement about giving '1.4 billion unique people' ownership opportunity reveals the strategy: use content audience trust as distribution infrastructure for higher-margin financial services. The 'MrBeast Financial' trademark filing covering cryptocurrency trading, banking, investment advisory, and credit/debit card issuance shows scope beyond teen banking into full financial services platform.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3693 — "beast industries 5b valuation prices content as loss leader model at enterprise scale"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** CNBC Step acquisition coverage, Feb 10, 2026; Tubefilter DealBook coverage, Dec 4, 2025
+
+The Step acquisition provides concrete evidence of the loss-leader strategy execution. Beast Industries acquired a fintech app with 7M+ users to convert audience trust (1.4B unique viewers in 90 days) into financial services distribution. CEO Jeffrey Housenbold's December 2025 statement at DealBook Summit explicitly frames this: 'At some point, we want to be able to give the 1.4 billion unique people around the world who has watched Jimmy's content the last 90 days a chance to be owners of the company.' The 'MrBeast Financial' trademark filing covering cryptocurrency trading, crypto payment processing, DEX trading, online banking, cash advances, investment advisory, and credit/debit card issuance reveals the scope of planned financial services expansion. Content (~50% of revenue from MrBeast YouTube channel) functions as audience acquisition for higher-margin fintech and consumer goods businesses.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/community-anchored-in-genuine-engagement-sustains-economic-value-through-market-cycles-while-speculation-anchored-communities-collapse.md b/domains/entertainment/community-anchored-in-genuine-engagement-sustains-economic-value-through-market-cycles-while-speculation-anchored-communities-collapse.md
index ab185f36e..4d2996df5 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/community-anchored-in-genuine-engagement-sustains-economic-value-through-market-cycles-while-speculation-anchored-communities-collapse.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/community-anchored-in-genuine-engagement-sustains-economic-value-through-market-cycles-while-speculation-anchored-communities-collapse.md
@@ -11,6 +11,50 @@ scope: causal
 sourcer: BlockEden.xyz
 related_claims: ["[[community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]]", "[[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-collapsed production costs where content becomes a loss leader for the scarce complements of fandom community and ownership]]", "[[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]]"]
 related: ["community-anchored-in-genuine-engagement-sustains-economic-value-through-market-cycles-while-speculation-anchored-communities-collapse"]
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3654 — "community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation anchored communities collapse"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** CoinDesk March 2026
+
+Pudgy Penguins' explicit pivot from token-first to narrative-first design is direct application of this insight. Leadership chose to invest in narrative depth and gameplay before forcing token mechanics, treating community engagement as the durable foundation. The Polly ARG and story-driven quests prioritize engagement over speculation.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3665 — "community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation anchored communities collapse"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** CoinDesk Pudgy World March 2026
+
+Pudgy Penguins' explicit pivot to 'narrative-first, token-second' design philosophy demonstrates leadership belief that genuine engagement (story, gameplay, community) sustains value better than token mechanics alone. This strategic choice came after proving $50M revenue scale, suggesting it's optimization for durability not just initial traction.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3671 — "community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation anchored communities collapse"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** CoinDesk Pudgy World launch March 2026
+
+Pudgy Penguins' explicit pivot to 'narrative-first, token-second' design philosophy represents direct application of this insight. By building narrative affinity and gameplay before layering token economics, they're betting on genuine engagement over speculation as the sustainable foundation for economic value.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3685 — "community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation anchored communities collapse"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** CoinDesk March 2026
+
+Pudgy Penguins' explicit pivot to 'narrative-first, token-second' design philosophy demonstrates leadership belief that genuine engagement (story, gameplay, community) sustains value better than token mechanics alone. The pre-launch ARG, story-driven quests, and narrative infrastructure investments (Lore, YouTube, DreamWorks) are strategic bets on engagement over speculation. PENGU token +9% on launch day but the strategic focus is narrative/gameplay, not token price.
+
 ---
 
 # Community anchored in genuine engagement sustains economic value through market cycles while speculation-anchored communities collapse
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/community-owned-IP-grows-through-complex-contagion-not-viral-spread-because-fandom-requires-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-community-members.md b/domains/entertainment/community-owned-IP-grows-through-complex-contagion-not-viral-spread-because-fandom-requires-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-community-members.md
index a49c38c21..2aed4bc5c 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/community-owned-IP-grows-through-complex-contagion-not-viral-spread-because-fandom-requires-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-community-members.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/community-owned-IP-grows-through-complex-contagion-not-viral-spread-because-fandom-requires-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-community-members.md
@@ -33,6 +33,50 @@ The implication for IP strategy: marketing budgets that optimize for reach (simp
 ## Challenges
 This bridge claim is theoretical synthesis, not empirical measurement. No study has directly measured contagion dynamics within a community-owned IP project. The Claynosaurz case is consistent with complex contagion but doesn't prove it — alternative explanations (NFT financial incentive, quality of animation talent) could account for community growth without invoking contagion theory. The claim would strengthen substantially if community growth curves were analyzed against Centola's threshold models.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3656 — "community owned ip grows through complex contagion not viral spread because fandom requires multiple reinforcing exposures from trusted community members"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Watch Club metrics strategy (TechCrunch, Feb 2026)
+
+Watch Club's supplementary content strategy (in-character social media posts and text messages between episodes) creates multiple touchpoints for reinforcing exposure. The platform's tracking of 'social follows for cast/writers' as a key metric suggests they're measuring complex contagion through creator-fan relationship depth rather than viral reach.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3662 — "community owned ip grows through complex contagion not viral spread because fandom requires multiple reinforcing exposures from trusted community members"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Watch Club launch (TechCrunch, Feb 2026)
+
+Watch Club's in-character social media posts and text messages between episodes create multiple touchpoints for audience engagement beyond the core episodes. The platform's integration of reaction videos and discussions inside the app (rather than relying on external social platforms) suggests they're architecting for complex contagion by creating multiple reinforcing exposures within a trusted community environment.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3681 — "community owned ip grows through complex contagion not viral spread because fandom requires multiple reinforcing exposures from trusted community members"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Watch Club launch (TechCrunch Feb 2026)
+
+Watch Club's supplementary content strategy (in-character social media posts and text messages between episodes) creates multiple touchpoints for reinforcing exposure. The platform's integration of reaction videos and discussions between episodes structures the complex contagion mechanism by enabling community members to serve as trusted validators for new viewers.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3690 — "community owned ip grows through complex contagion not viral spread because fandom requires multiple reinforcing exposures from trusted community members"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Watch Club launch (TechCrunch Feb 2026)
+
+Watch Club's supplementary content strategy (in-character social media posts and text messages between episodes) creates multiple touchpoints for reinforcing exposure. The platform's poll-and-reaction-video format between episodes described as 'very Gen Z' suggests they're building infrastructure for the complex contagion mechanism — multiple reinforcing exposures from community members rather than single viral spread.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/community-owned-ip-invests-in-narrative-infrastructure-as-scaling-mechanism-after-proving-token-mechanics.md b/domains/entertainment/community-owned-ip-invests-in-narrative-infrastructure-as-scaling-mechanism-after-proving-token-mechanics.md
index d9ac8a942..2aee08230 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/community-owned-ip-invests-in-narrative-infrastructure-as-scaling-mechanism-after-proving-token-mechanics.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/community-owned-ip-invests-in-narrative-infrastructure-as-scaling-mechanism-after-proving-token-mechanics.md
@@ -12,6 +12,17 @@ scope: causal
 sourcer: CoinDesk
 supports: ["the-media-attractor-state-is-community-filtered-ip-with-ai-collapsed-production-costs", "progressive-validation-through-community-building-reduces-development-risk-by-proving-audience-demand-before-production-investment"]
 related: ["minimum-viable-narrative-achieves-50m-revenue-scale-through-character-design-and-distribution-without-story-depth", "the-media-attractor-state-is-community-filtered-ip-with-ai-collapsed-production-costs", "community-owned-IP-grows-through-complex-contagion-not-viral-spread-because-fandom-requires-multiple-reinforcing-exposures-from-trusted-community-members", "pudgy-world", "web3-ip-crossover-strategy-inverts-from-blockchain-as-product-to-blockchain-as-invisible-infrastructure", "minimum-viable-narrative-strategy-optimizes-for-commercial-scale-through-volume-production-and-distribution-coverage-over-story-depth", "hiding-blockchain-infrastructure-beneath-mainstream-presentation-enables-web3-projects-to-access-traditional-distribution-channels", "community-owned-ip-invests-in-narrative-infrastructure-as-scaling-mechanism-after-proving-token-mechanics", "pre-launch-args-function-as-narrative-validation-mechanism-for-community-owned-ip"]
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3691 — "community owned ip invests in narrative infrastructure as scaling mechanism after proving token mechanics"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** AInvest, Pudgy Penguins-DreamWorks Oct 2025
+
+Pudgy Penguins' DreamWorks deal represents narrative infrastructure investment through institutional borrowing rather than endogenous development. After proving community scale (3,100+ Walmart stores, $120M 2026 revenue target), they're acquiring narrative equity from an established franchise (Kung Fu Panda) rather than developing independent narrative depth. This suggests narrative infrastructure at franchise scale may require institutional partnerships, not just community investment.
+
 ---
 
 # Community-owned IP franchises invest in narrative infrastructure as a scaling mechanism after proving token mechanics at niche scale
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/community-trust-functions-as-general-purpose-commercial-collateral-enabling-6-to-1-commerce-to-content-revenue-ratios.md b/domains/entertainment/community-trust-functions-as-general-purpose-commercial-collateral-enabling-6-to-1-commerce-to-content-revenue-ratios.md
index 31d6225b3..30c38bb16 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/community-trust-functions-as-general-purpose-commercial-collateral-enabling-6-to-1-commerce-to-content-revenue-ratios.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/community-trust-functions-as-general-purpose-commercial-collateral-enabling-6-to-1-commerce-to-content-revenue-ratios.md
@@ -13,6 +13,20 @@ related_claims: ["[[the media attractor state is community-filtered IP with AI-c
 supports: ["Community trust as financial distribution mechanism creates regulatory responsibility proportional to audience vulnerability"]
 reweave_edges: ["Community trust as financial distribution mechanism creates regulatory responsibility proportional to audience vulnerability|supports|2026-04-17"]
 related: ["community-trust-functions-as-general-purpose-commercial-collateral-enabling-6-to-1-commerce-to-content-revenue-ratios", "beast-industries", "beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale", "community-trust-as-financial-distribution-creates-regulatory-responsibility-proportional-to-audience-vulnerability"]
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3659 — "community trust functions as general purpose commercial collateral enabling 6 to 1 commerce to content revenue ratios"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+related: ["community-trust-functions-as-general-purpose-commercial-collateral-enabling-6-to-1-commerce-to-content-revenue-ratios", "beast-industries", "beast-industries-5b-valuation-prices-content-as-loss-leader-model-at-enterprise-scale", "community-trust-as-financial-distribution-creates-regulatory-responsibility-proportional-to-audience-vulnerability", "creator-economy-ma-signals-institutional-recognition-of-community-trust-as-acquirable-asset-class"]
+
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** CoinDesk Pudgy World coverage March 2026
+
+Pudgy Penguins revenue stack demonstrates community trust converting to commerce: $50M in 2025 revenue from Visa Pengu Card, Vibes TCG (4M cards), 3,100+ Walmart retail stores, Manchester City partnership, targeting $120M in 2026. Revenue comes primarily from physical products and partnerships, not content or game monetization directly. The community (160K accounts, 15-25K DAU) functions as commercial collateral enabling diverse revenue streams.
+
 ---
 
 # Community trust functions as general-purpose commercial collateral enabling 6:1 commerce-to-content revenue ratios at top creator scale
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/creator-IP-independence-from-personality-is-structural-advantage-for-long-term-value-capture.md b/domains/entertainment/creator-IP-independence-from-personality-is-structural-advantage-for-long-term-value-capture.md
index 890497df1..92227865a 100644
--- a/domains/entertainment/creator-IP-independence-from-personality-is-structural-advantage-for-long-term-value-capture.md
+++ b/domains/entertainment/creator-IP-independence-from-personality-is-structural-advantage-for-long-term-value-capture.md
@@ -11,6 +11,17 @@ scope: structural
 sourcer: The Reelstars, AInews International
 related_claims: ["[[community-owned-IP-has-structural-advantage-in-human-made-premium-because-provenance-is-inherent-and-legible]]", "[[creator-world-building-converts-viewers-into-returning-communities-by-creating-belonging-audiences-can-recognize-participate-in-and-return-to]]", "[[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]]"]
 related: ["creator-IP-independence-from-personality-is-structural-advantage-for-long-term-value-capture", "creator-brand-partnerships-shifting-from-transactional-campaigns-to-long-term-joint-ventures-with-shared-formats-audiences-and-revenue"]
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3686 — "creator ip independence from personality is structural advantage for long term value capture"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** NetInfluencer 92-expert roundup 2026
+
+Expert consensus on 'ownable IP with a clear storyworld, recurring characters' as the real asset directly validates IP independence from personality. The framing is explicitly about building franchise infrastructure that can outlive individual creator presence. The shift from 'views and one-off brand deals' to 'durable IP that compounds' requires structural separation between creator personality and IP architecture.
+
 ---
 
 # Creator IP that persists independent of the creator's personal brand is the emerging structural advantage in the creator economy because it enables revenue streams that survive beyond individual creator burnout or platform shifts
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md b/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md
index 696ba3fd5..50d3735ac 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md
@@ -91,6 +91,28 @@ Tribal gaming operators filed ANPRM comments representing a $40B+ annual industr
 
 Tribal gaming operators filed ANPRM comments representing a $40B+ annual industry with distinct federal law standing under IGRA. IGA Chairman David Bean and California Nations Indian Gaming Association Chairman James Siva both characterized CFTC preemption as an existential threat to tribal gaming exclusivity. This adds a politically powerful stakeholder coalition with congressional access independent of state AG opposition.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3626 — "anprm comment volume signals bipartisan political pressure on cftc rulemaking"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Norton Rose Fulbright ANPRM analysis, April 21 2026
+
+Norton Rose provides detailed comment composition breakdown: 800+ total submissions as of April 19, with only 19 filed before April 2. Sharp surge after April 2 coincides with CFTC suing three states, raising public visibility. Submitters include state gaming commissions, tribal gaming operators, prediction market operators (Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX), law firms, academics (Seton Hall), and private retail citizens. Dominant tonal split: institutional skews negative, industry skews self-regulatory positive, retail skews skeptical. The retail citizen comment surge (predominantly skeptical) represents a new dynamic beyond institutional/industry battle — genuine public engagement from people who see prediction markets as gambling.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3677 — "anprm comment volume signals bipartisan political pressure on cftc rulemaking"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Norton Rose Fulbright ANPRM analysis April 21 2026
+
+Norton Rose analysis provides detailed comment composition breakdown: 800+ total submissions with sharp surge after April 2 (coinciding with CFTC suing three states). Submitters include state gaming commissions, tribal gaming operators, prediction market operators (Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX), law firms, academics (Seton Hall), and private retail citizens. Dominant tonal split: institutional skews negative, industry skews self-regulatory positive, retail skews skeptical. This reveals the ANPRM comment record isn't just a battle between states and industry — it's generating genuine public engagement from people who see prediction markets as gambling.
+
 ---
 
 # 800+ ANPRM comment submissions from both industry and state gaming opponents signal that the CFTC's post-April 30 rulemaking process will face intense political pressure from both sides
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-comment-record-lacks-futarchy-governance-market-distinction-creating-default-gambling-framework.md b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-comment-record-lacks-futarchy-governance-market-distinction-creating-default-gambling-framework.md
index 35f264651..29efb9d64 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-comment-record-lacks-futarchy-governance-market-distinction-creating-default-gambling-framework.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-comment-record-lacks-futarchy-governance-market-distinction-creating-default-gambling-framework.md
@@ -71,6 +71,17 @@ ProphetX's comments focus exclusively on sports event contracts and consumer pro
 
 ProphetX's Section 4(c) proposal demonstrates sophisticated regulatory engagement from a new market entrant, but focuses exclusively on sports event contracts with no mention of governance markets or futarchy applications. This reinforces the KB's observation that the ANPRM comment record lacks futarchy-specific input—even operators proposing novel regulatory frameworks are not making the governance market distinction.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3699 — "cftc anprm comment record lacks futarchy governance market distinction creating default gambling framework"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Norton Rose Fulbright ANPRM analysis, April 21 2026
+
+Norton Rose analysis confirms 800+ total ANPRM submissions with sharp surge after April 2 (coinciding with CFTC suing three states). Submitters include state gaming commissions, tribal gaming operators, prediction market operators (Kalshi, Polymarket, ProphetX), law firms, academics, and retail citizens. Dominant tonal split: institutional skews negative, industry skews self-regulatory positive, retail skews skeptical. No mention of futarchy governance markets as a distinct category in the comment breakdown.
+
 ---
 
 # The CFTC ANPRM comment record as of April 2026 contains zero filings distinguishing futarchy governance markets from event betting markets, creating a default regulatory framework that will apply gambling-use-case restrictions to governance-use-case mechanisms
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-prophetx-section-4c-framework-codifies-sports-contract-preemption-through-uniform-federal-standards.md b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-prophetx-section-4c-framework-codifies-sports-contract-preemption-through-uniform-federal-standards.md
index 0b8c93cf3..a8d39c904 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-prophetx-section-4c-framework-codifies-sports-contract-preemption-through-uniform-federal-standards.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-anprm-prophetx-section-4c-framework-codifies-sports-contract-preemption-through-uniform-federal-standards.md
@@ -26,6 +26,17 @@ related: ["cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-
 
 ProphetX's Section 4(c) proposal is architecturally more durable than field preemption because it provides explicit CFTC permission that directly overrides Rule 40.11's 'shall not list' prohibition, rather than arguing that sports contracts are authorized swaps despite Rule 40.11. This creates a fallback path if courts reject the preemption argument.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3675 — "cftc anprm prophetx section 4c framework codifies sports contract preemption through uniform federal standards"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** ProphetX CFTC ANPRM comments, April 2026
+
+ProphetX's Section 4(c) proposal is architecturally more durable than field preemption because it creates explicit CFTC permission that directly overrides Rule 40.11's 'shall not list' prohibition, rather than arguing around it. If 9th Circuit rejects preemption, Section 4(c) provides a fallback path that doesn't depend on field preemption doctrine.
+
 ---
 
 # ProphetX Section 4(c) conditions-based framework proposes codified sports contract preemption through uniform federal standards replacing ad-hoc no-action relief
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-gaming-classification-silence-signals-rule-40-11-structural-contradiction.md b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-gaming-classification-silence-signals-rule-40-11-structural-contradiction.md
index 2a7a1f524..720a9633d 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-gaming-classification-silence-signals-rule-40-11-structural-contradiction.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-gaming-classification-silence-signals-rule-40-11-structural-contradiction.md
@@ -136,6 +136,61 @@ related: ["cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-
 
 Judge Nelson's questioning at Ninth Circuit oral arguments directly addressed Rule 40.11: CFTC's own regulations prohibit DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless CFTC grants an exception. Nelson framed prediction markets as having two options — they can't do the activity at all, or they're regulated by the state. The federal authorization they claim either doesn't exist (gaming is prohibited on DCMs) or requires explicit CFTC permission (which hasn't been granted specifically for sports event contracts). CFTC attorney Minot's response (arguing CFTC doesn't define sports contracts as 'gaming') was apparently unpersuasive to the panel.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3621 — "cftc gaming classification silence signals rule 40 11 structural contradiction"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Bloomberg Law, April 17, 2026
+
+Judge Nelson's questioning at Ninth Circuit oral arguments directly addressed Rule 40.11: CFTC's own regulations prohibit DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless CFTC grants an exception. Nelson framed prediction markets as having two options — they can't do the activity at all, or they're regulated by the state. The federal authorization they claim either doesn't exist (gaming is prohibited on DCMs) or requires explicit CFTC permission (which hasn't been granted specifically for sports event contracts). CFTC attorney Minot's response arguing the CFTC doesn't define sports contracts as 'gaming' was apparently unpersuasive to the panel.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3639 — "cftc gaming classification silence signals rule 40 11 structural contradiction"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Bloomberg Law, April 17, 2026
+
+Judge Nelson's questioning at April 16, 2026 Ninth Circuit oral arguments directly targeted Rule 40.11: CFTC's own regulations prohibit DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless CFTC grants an exception. Nelson framed the dilemma: prediction markets either can't do the activity at all (gaming is prohibited on DCMs), or they're regulated by the state. The federal authorization they claim either doesn't exist or requires explicit CFTC permission not yet granted for sports event contracts. CFTC attorney Minot's response (arguing CFTC doesn't define sports contracts as 'gaming') was apparently unpersuasive to the panel.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3673 — "cftc gaming classification silence signals rule 40 11 structural contradiction"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Bloomberg Law, April 17, 2026 oral arguments
+
+Judge Nelson focused extensively on Rule 40.11 during oral arguments, framing the core issue: CFTC's own regulations prohibit DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless CFTC grants an exception. Nelson stated prediction markets have two options — they can't do the activity at all, or they're regulated by the state. The federal authorization they claim either doesn't exist (gaming is prohibited on DCMs) or requires explicit CFTC permission (which hasn't been granted specifically for sports event contracts). CFTC attorney Minot's response arguing the CFTC doesn't define sports contracts as 'gaming' was apparently unpersuasive to the panel.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3687 — "cftc gaming classification silence signals rule 40 11 structural contradiction"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Bloomberg Law, April 17, 2026
+
+Judge Nelson's questioning at Ninth Circuit oral arguments directly targeted Rule 40.11: CFTC's own regulations prohibit DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless CFTC grants an exception. Nelson framed prediction markets as having two options: they can't do the activity at all, or they're regulated by the state. The federal authorization they claim either doesn't exist (gaming is prohibited on DCMs) or requires explicit CFTC permission (which hasn't been granted specifically for sports event contracts). CFTC attorney Minot's response (arguing CFTC doesn't define sports contracts as 'gaming') was apparently unpersuasive to the panel.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3695 — "cftc gaming classification silence signals rule 40 11 structural contradiction"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Bloomberg Law, April 17, 2026
+
+Judge Nelson's questioning at April 16, 2026 Ninth Circuit oral arguments directly targeted Rule 40.11: CFTC's own regulations prohibit DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless CFTC grants an exception. Nelson framed the contradiction: prediction markets either can't do the activity at all (gaming is prohibited on DCMs), or they're regulated by the state. The federal authorization they claim either doesn't exist or requires explicit CFTC permission not yet granted for sports event contracts. CFTC attorney Minot's response (arguing CFTC doesn't define sports contracts as 'gaming') was apparently unpersuasive to the panel.
+
 ---
 
 # CFTC's refusal to address whether sports contracts qualify as gaming contracts under Rule 40.11 during congressional testimony signals the rule creates a structural contradiction in DCM authorization that cannot be resolved without ANPRM rulemaking
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets.md b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets.md
index bbe3d2c11..2b02e5a11 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-licensed-dcm-preemption-protects-centralized-prediction-markets-but-not-decentralized-governance-markets.md
@@ -137,6 +137,94 @@ Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 paradox argument: CFR Rule 40.11 prohibits DCMs from l
 
 Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 paradox argument directly challenges the DCM preemption shield: 'The only way to get around it is if you get permission first.' If sports event contracts are gaming contracts (Nelson: 'You go to a casino to make sports bets'), then CFTC Rule 40.11 prohibits DCMs from listing them unless the CFTC grants an exception. This creates a structural contradiction where the same CFTC framework that prediction markets cite for federal preemption also forbids their core product, potentially eliminating the preemption defense entirely.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3623 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** MultiState legislative tracking, March 23, 2026
+
+The Curtis-Schiff bill would eliminate DCM preemption protection through Congressional redefinition of sports contracts as gambling products requiring state licenses. This shows the preemption is not structurally durable—it depends on Congressional forbearance and can be overridden through legislation regardless of court precedent. Bipartisan sponsorship (Curtis R-Utah, Schiff D-California) increases passage probability beyond partisan gaming revenue fights.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3624 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** casino.org reporting on Ninth Circuit oral arguments, April 16, 2026
+
+Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 paradox argument at oral arguments: CFR Rule 40.11 prohibits DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless the CFTC grants an exception. If sports event contracts are gaming contracts (Nelson: 'You go to a casino to make sports bets'), then the CFTC framework that Kalshi claims authorizes them also forbids their core product. This eliminates the preemption shield because the federal authorization they rely on simultaneously prohibits what they're doing. Nevada's attorney characterized sports event contracts as functionally identical to sports books, focusing on consumer protection and tax revenue arguments.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3629 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** MultiState, March 2026
+
+Curtis-Schiff bill scope explicitly targets CFTC-registered DCM platforms while remaining silent on on-chain prediction markets and futarchy governance, confirming the regulatory bifurcation between centralized and decentralized implementations
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3640 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** Judge Nelson, Ninth Circuit oral arguments April 16, 2026
+
+Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 paradox argument directly challenges the DCM preemption shield: 'You go to a casino to make sports bets' — treating sports event contracts as gaming contracts. If sports contracts are gaming contracts, then CFR Rule 40.11 ('shall not list for trading' gaming contracts without CFTC exception) means CFTC's own rules prohibit rather than authorize them on DCMs. This eliminates the federal preemption argument that DCM registration provides, because the authorization itself is conditional on NOT being gaming contracts. Nevada's attorney emphasized this functional equivalence to sports books throughout oral arguments.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3663 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** Curtis-Schiff Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, March 2026
+
+Curtis-Schiff bill would eliminate DCM preemption for sports contracts by explicitly prohibiting CFTC-registered platforms from listing them, showing that Congressional action can override CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction claim through statutory redefinition rather than requiring judicial interpretation.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3674 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** casino.org, April 20, 2026; Judge Nelson oral argument transcript
+
+Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 analysis creates a preemption paradox: CFR Rule 40.11 prohibits DCMs from listing gaming contracts unless the CFTC grants an exception. Nelson stated: '40.11 says any regulated entity shall not list for trading gaming contracts. It prohibits it from going on.' When CFTC attorney Jordan Minot argued the agency doesn't define sports contracts as 'involving gaming,' Nelson replied: 'You go to a casino to make sports bets.' This means the very CFTC framework that prediction markets claim as the basis for federal preemption over state gaming laws also forbids their core product—eliminating the preemption shield they rely on.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3696 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** Judge Nelson, Ninth Circuit oral arguments, April 16, 2026
+
+Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 paradox argument at Ninth Circuit oral arguments: CFTC Rule 40.11 explicitly prohibits DCMs from listing gaming contracts ('shall not list for trading') unless the CFTC grants an exception. If sports event contracts are gaming contracts (as Nevada argues and Nelson appears to accept: 'You go to a casino to make sports bets'), then the very CFTC framework that prediction markets cite for federal preemption actually forbids their core product. This eliminates the preemption shield by making CFTC authorization self-contradictory. The challenge is structural: DCM registration cannot provide preemption if CFTC's own rules prohibit the contracts being preempted.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3669 — "cftc licensed dcm preemption protects centralized prediction markets but not decentralized governance markets"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Challenging Evidence
+
+**Source:** Prediction Markets Are Gambling Act, Curtis-Schiff, March 23, 2026
+
+Curtis-Schiff bill would eliminate DCM preemption protection by Congressional redefinition of sports contracts as gambling products requiring state gaming licenses. This represents a legislative override pathway that makes DCM registration insufficient protection—if the bill passes, CFTC-registered platforms would be prohibited from listing sports contracts regardless of preemption doctrine. The scope limitation (DCM platforms only, not on-chain markets) preserves the decentralized governance market distinction but eliminates the centralized platform protection mechanism.
+
 ---
 
 # CFTC-licensed DCM preemption protects centralized prediction markets from state gambling law but leaves decentralized governance markets legally exposed because they cannot access the DCM licensing pathway
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-futarchy-80-iq-governance-blocks-catastrophic-decisions-not-strategic-optimization.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-futarchy-80-iq-governance-blocks-catastrophic-decisions-not-strategic-optimization.md
index 29c512198..901fdff9c 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-futarchy-80-iq-governance-blocks-catastrophic-decisions-not-strategic-optimization.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-futarchy-80-iq-governance-blocks-catastrophic-decisions-not-strategic-optimization.md
@@ -133,6 +133,116 @@ Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block
 
 Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The omnibus proposal itself passed through futarchy governance, demonstrating the mechanism is self-governing its own strategic decisions.
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3622 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The omnibus proposal itself passed through futarchy governance, demonstrating the mechanism is self-governing its own strategic decisions.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3628 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The reset is explicitly NOT a response to mechanism failure but rather revenue/throughput optimization in response to ICO cadence decline.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3635 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The reset is a response to business model vulnerability (ICO cadence decline), not mechanism failure.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3644 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The omnibus proposal itself passed through futarchy governance, demonstrating the mechanism is self-governing its own strategic decisions.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3649 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The omnibus proposal itself PASSED through futarchy governance, demonstrating the mechanism is self-governing its own strategic decisions.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3655 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The reset is explicitly a revenue/throughput optimization in response to ICO cadence decline, not a mechanism failure. No evidence of core futarchy mechanism breakdown (manipulation, market design issues, governance attacks) driving the reset.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3661 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. This assessment came during the strategic reset announcement, framing the platform's current capabilities.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3667 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The reset is explicitly NOT a mechanism failure response but a revenue/throughput optimization in response to ICO cadence decline.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3682 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The omnibus proposal itself PASSED through futarchy governance, demonstrating the mechanism is self-governing its own strategic decisions.
+
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3688 — "metadao futarchy 80 iq governance blocks catastrophic decisions not strategic optimization"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Supporting Evidence
+
+**Source:** Blockworks, January 6, 2026
+
+Kollan House characterized current futarchy as '~80 IQ' — good enough to block catastrophic decisions, not yet sophisticated enough to replace C-suite judgment. The reset is explicitly NOT a mechanism failure response but a revenue/throughput optimization in response to ICO cadence decline.
+
 ---
 
 # MetaDAO futarchy functions as 80 IQ governance capable of blocking catastrophic decisions but not sophisticated enough to replace executive judgment on complex strategy
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/prediction-market-scale-exceeds-decision-market-scale-by-two-orders-of-magnitude-showing-pure-forecasting-dominates-governance-applications.md b/domains/internet-finance/prediction-market-scale-exceeds-decision-market-scale-by-two-orders-of-magnitude-showing-pure-forecasting-dominates-governance-applications.md
index e11f08a09..fca77ce2b 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/prediction-market-scale-exceeds-decision-market-scale-by-two-orders-of-magnitude-showing-pure-forecasting-dominates-governance-applications.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/prediction-market-scale-exceeds-decision-market-scale-by-two-orders-of-magnitude-showing-pure-forecasting-dominates-governance-applications.md
@@ -33,6 +33,17 @@ This does not mean decision markets are failing — MetaDAO's $57.3M AUF and gro
 - Both Polymarket and Kalshi targeting $20B valuations
 - The Block reports prediction market space "exploded in 2025"
 
+
+### Auto-enrichment (near-duplicate conversion, similarity=1.00)
+*Source: PR #3630 — "prediction market scale exceeds decision market scale by two orders of magnitude showing pure forecasting dominates governance applications"*
+*Auto-converted by substantive fixer. Review: revert if this evidence doesn't belong here.*
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Bloomberg Law, April 17, 2026
+
+Total prediction market trading volume exceeded $6.5 billion in first two weeks of April 2026. The Masters golf market alone reached $460M. This represents massive acceleration in scale — markets growing faster than regulatory certainty timeline, creating mismatch between market size and regulatory durability.
+
 ---
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)