diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md b/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
index 9f0ae5600..7bddb4b1c 100644
--- a/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
+++ b/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
 - **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
 
 - **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
+- **2026-02-00** — Strategic reset debate: curated vs permissionless launch model. Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 as ICO activity slowed. Total revenue since Futarchy AMM launch (Oct 10, 2025): ~$2.4M (60% AMM fees, 40% Meteora LP). Proposed 'verified launch' system to layer reputation trust on permissionless infrastructure. Two key catalysts identified: permissionless launches + Colosseum's STAMP.
 ## Key Decisions
 | Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
 |------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/meteora.md b/entities/internet-finance/meteora.md
index d887a3f9e..17b9fc21d 100644
--- a/entities/internet-finance/meteora.md
+++ b/entities/internet-finance/meteora.md
@@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ Solana liquidity protocol offering Dynamic Liquidity Market Maker (DLMM) pools,
 - **2025-Q4** — Meteora LP generates $1.15M in fees for MetaDAO (Pine Analytics Q4 report)
 - **2025-10 to 2026-03** — Every Futardio launch allocates 900K tokens to Meteora pool as standard template
 
+- **2026-02-00** — MetaDAO LP positions on Meteora generated 40% of MetaDAO's total revenue (~$960K of $2.4M) since Futarchy AMM launch in October 2025.
 ## Competitive Position
 - **Infrastructure role**: Not competing with MetaDAO — provides complementary liquidity infrastructure. Meteora is the LP venue; Futarchic AMM is the governance venue.
 - **vs Raydium**: Both are major Solana AMMs. Raydium offers CLMM (concentrated liquidity). Meteora differentiates with DLMM and dynamic bonding pools.
diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
index eeca6257d..cfa88ee07 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-02-00
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: high
 tags: [metadao, permissionless, curation, launchpad, strategic-reset, mechanism-design]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md", "internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Extracted three claims: (1) verified launch mechanism as novel coordination design, (2) revenue cadence as forcing function for permissionless transition, (3) DAO of DAOs vision as attractor state. Enriched three existing claims with new evidence on MetaDAO's strategic inflection. Updated MetaDAO and Meteora entity timelines with revenue data and strategic context. The verified launch system is the key mechanism design insight—reputation trust layered on permissionless infrastructure without gatekeeping. Revenue data provides empirical validation for why permissionless scaling is necessary, not just desirable."
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -53,3 +58,10 @@ MetaDAO has publicly debated whether to preserve curated launches or move to per
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: The curated → permissionless transition with verified trust layer is a novel mechanism design. Revenue cadence problem validates why permissionless is necessary. The "DAO of DAOs" vision directly relates to MetaDAO's platform thesis.
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) verified launch as mechanism design (reputation trust + permissionless infrastructure), (2) revenue cadence as evidence for permissionless necessity, (3) "DAO of DAOs" vision as attractor state.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- MetaDAO Futarchy AMM launched October 10, 2025
+- MetaDAO total revenue since launch: ~$2.4M (60% AMM fees, 40% Meteora LP)
+- Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025
+- Colosseum's STAMP identified as key catalyst alongside permissionless launches