diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
index 488981e2..762088c9 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: medium
 tags: [alignment-framing, Manhattan-project, operationalization, philosophical, AI-safety]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable.md", "some disagreements are permanently irreducible.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Extracted one composite claim covering all five dimensions of the Manhattan Project critique. Full text is paywalled so extraction is based on abstract and secondary discussion. Three enrichments connect this philosophical critique to existing systems-theory and coordination claims. The operationalizability argument (dimension 5) is the strongest novel contribution—asserting impossibility in principle rather than mere difficulty."
 ---
 
 ## Content