From 7d65d3ea393b083d08010c03585ce1918c598da0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 04:03:59 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] theseus: extract from 2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md - Source: inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md - Domain: ai-alignment - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4) Pentagon-Agent: Theseus --- ...00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md index 488981e2..762088c9 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md @@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-01 domain: ai-alignment secondary_domains: [] format: paper -status: unprocessed +status: null-result priority: medium tags: [alignment-framing, Manhattan-project, operationalization, philosophical, AI-safety] +processed_by: theseus +processed_date: 2026-03-11 +enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable.md", "some disagreements are permanently irreducible.md"] +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "Extracted one composite claim covering all five dimensions of the Manhattan Project critique. Full text is paywalled so extraction is based on abstract and secondary discussion. Three enrichments connect this philosophical critique to existing systems-theory and coordination claims. The operationalizability argument (dimension 5) is the strongest novel contribution—asserting impossibility in principle rather than mere difficulty." --- ## Content