diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-richard-isc-x-archive.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-richard-isc-x-archive.md
index aad10d21..0908bbd9 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-richard-isc-x-archive.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-richard-isc-x-archive.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: https://x.com/Richard_ISC
 date: 2026-03-09
 domain: internet-finance
 format: tweet
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 tags: [isc, governance, futarchy, mechanism-design, metadao-ecosystem, defi]
 linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
 curator_notes: |
@@ -23,6 +23,10 @@ extraction_hints:
   - "Ecosystem project evaluations — Richard's assessments provide practitioner perspective on futarchy outcomes"
   - "Connection: his criticism of overraising maps to our 'early-conviction pricing is an unsolved mechanism design problem' claim"
 priority: medium
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-10
+extraction_model: "minimax/minimax-m2.5"
+extraction_notes: "Source is a meta-summary of Richard_ISC's tweet content rather than actual tweets with verifiable evidence. The curator notes describe the type of content he produces (mechanism design critiques, governance token commentary) but don't provide specific data points, quotes, or study results that can be extracted into claims. Additionally, potential claims (overraising as mechanism design flaw, governance token liquidity vs equity, ecosystem project evaluations) would duplicate existing claims in the knowledge base about capital formation incentive misalignment, ownership coin thesis, and futarchy practitioner perspectives."
 ---
 
 # @Richard_ISC X Archive (March 2026)