diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md
index 69082ec1..b0e2edcc 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md
@@ -42,6 +42,12 @@ Rio identifies that MetaDAO conditional token markets with leveraged positions f
 
 Tetlock (Columbia, 2008) found that liquidity directly affects prediction market efficiency, with thin order books allowing a single trader's opinion to dominate pricing. The LMSR automated market maker was invented by Robin Hanson specifically because thin markets fail—this is an admission baked into the mechanism design itself.
 
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any]] | Added: 2026-03-24*
+
+Sanctum Wonder proposal markets had insufficient volume/liquidity to be considered credible by the team, leading to abandonment of futarchy experimentation. Low liquidity undermined the mechanism's credibility as a decision-making tool.
+
+
 
 Relevant Notes:
 - [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]]
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md b/domains/internet-finance/sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md
index 1deb45ef..23934dff 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md
@@ -69,4 +69,10 @@ This case raises questions about the optimal scope for futarchy mechanisms:
 - Do longer time horizons and higher execution uncertainty make futarchy less effective?
 - Should DAOs mix governance mechanisms based on decision type?
 
-These questions connect to [[optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms for different decision types]], though this single case provides only weak evidence for any particular answer.
\ No newline at end of file
+These questions connect to [[optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms for different decision types]], though this single case provides only weak evidence for any particular answer.
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any]] | Added: 2026-03-24*
+
+Sanctum's futarchy markets were generally considered thin relative to MetaDAO's, which is part of why the experiment didn't get much follow-through. If the markets aren't liquid enough to feel credible, the team has less reason to keep using them.
+
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md
index 4763c345..45bfb51e 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md
@@ -7,12 +7,16 @@ url: ""
 date: 2026-03-24
 domain: internet-finance
 format: conversation
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: high
 intake_tier: directed
 rationale: "interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?"
 proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
 tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-24
+enrichments_applied: ["sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md", "futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
 ## Conversation
@@ -32,3 +36,9 @@ RESEARCH: Sanctum CLOUD futarchy proposal volume liquidity 2025
 **Rationale from contributor:** interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?
 **Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
 **Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Volume data on Sanctum Wonder proposal is not available in accessible sources as of March 2026
+- Sanctum Wonder proposal failed in late March 2025
+- Sanctum's futarchy markets had lower liquidity than MetaDAO's markets