diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-claim-m3taversal-metadao-s-active-intervention-in-permissioned-launches-creat.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-claim-m3taversal-metadao-s-active-intervention-in-permissioned-launches-creat.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 0c3e3a37..00000000
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-claim-m3taversal-metadao-s-active-intervention-in-permissioned-launches-creat.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
----
-type: source
-source_type: telegram-claim
-title: "Claim from @m3taversal — MetaDAO's active intervention in permissioned launches creates implicit due dili"
-author: "@m3taversal"
-date: 2026-03-30
-domain: internet-finance
-format: claim-draft
-status: processed
-proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
-contribution_type: claim-proposal
-tags: [telegram-claim, inline-claim]
-processed_by: rio
-processed_date: 2026-03-30
-claims_extracted: ["permissioned-launch-curation-creates-implicit-endorsement-liability-for-futarchy-platforms.md"]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
----
-
-# Draft Claim: MetaDAO's active intervention in permissioned launches creates implicit due diligence obligations that increase legal liability beyond what a neutral platform mechanism would carry, because each curatorial decision is an act of endorsement that regulators and investors can point to as evidence of gatekeeper responsibility
-
-Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
-Flagged by Rio as a specific, disagreeable assertion worth extracting.
-
-## Verbatim User Message
-
-@FutAIrdBot what do you think of these posts? https://x.com/jabranthelawyer/status/2038413063381246199?s=20 and the underlying one from metaDAO? https://x.com/metaproph3t/status/2038369060598223268 Imo this approach makes sense from metaDAO but I want you think deeply and analyze
-
-## Proposed Claim
-
-MetaDAO's active intervention in permissioned launches creates implicit due diligence obligations that increase legal liability beyond what a neutral platform mechanism would carry, because each curatorial decision is an act of endorsement that regulators and investors can point to as evidence of gatekeeper responsibility
-
-
-## Key Facts
-- @jabranthelawyer posted analysis on Twitter (status/2038413063381246199) discussing MetaDAO's launch approach
-- @metaproph3t posted underlying context on Twitter (status/2038369060598223268) about MetaDAO's permissioned launch model
-- @m3taversal requested FutAIrdBot analysis of both posts in Telegram
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-shared-metadaoproject-2033390670438600715-s-20.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-shared-metadaoproject-2033390670438600715-s-20.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 2d23bee8..00000000
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-shared-metadaoproject-2033390670438600715-s-20.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,40 +0,0 @@
----
-type: source
-source_type: x-tweet
-title: "@MetaDAOProject — shared via Telegram by @m3taversal"
-author: "@MetaDAOProject"
-url: "https://x.com/MetaDAOProject/status/2033390670438600715?s=20"
-date: 2026-03-30
-domain: internet-finance
-format: social-media
-status: enrichment
-proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
-contribution_type: source-submission
-tags: ['telegram-shared', 'x-tweet', 'crypto-infra']
-processed_by: rio
-processed_date: 2026-03-30
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
----
-
-# @MetaDAOProject — Tweet/Thread
-
-Shared by @m3taversal via Telegram.
-Source URL: https://x.com/MetaDAOProject/status/2033390670438600715?s=20
-
-## Content
-
-🧵 The Ranger redemption numbers have been finalized.
-
-Eligible tokens: 6,137,825.101
-Redemption wallet balance: $5,047,249.68
-Per token value: $0.822318
-
-Claim link drops tomorrow. Full breakdown 👇
-
-
-## Key Facts
-- Ranger redemption finalized on 2026-03-30
-- Eligible tokens: 6,137,825.101
-- Redemption wallet balance: $5,047,249.68
-- Per token redemption value: $0.822318
-- Claim link scheduled to drop day after announcement