diff --git a/domains/ai-alignment/voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md b/domains/ai-alignment/voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md
index 3a70c264..d643af90 100644
--- a/domains/ai-alignment/voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md	
+++ b/domains/ai-alignment/voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md	
@@ -45,6 +45,12 @@ The gap between expert consensus (76 specialists identify third-party audits as
 
 Comprehensive evidence across governance mechanisms: ALL international declarations (Bletchley, Seoul, Paris, Hiroshima, OECD, UN) produced zero verified behavioral change. Frontier Model Forum produced no binding commitments. White House voluntary commitments eroded. 450+ organizations lobbied on AI in 2025 ($92M in fees), California SB 1047 vetoed after industry pressure. Only binding regulation (EU AI Act, China enforcement, US export controls) changed behavior.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral]] | Added: 2026-03-19*
+
+Government pressure adds to competitive dynamics. The DoD/Anthropic episode shows that safety-conscious labs face not just market competition but active government penalties for maintaining safeguards. The Pentagon threatened blacklisting specifically because Anthropic maintained protections against mass surveillance and autonomous weapons—government as competitive pressure amplifier.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.md b/inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.md
index c18090b5..b0edcdfa 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/ai-alignment/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.md
@@ -7,12 +7,12 @@ date: 2026-03-18
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: enrichment
 priority: high
 tags: [governance, procurement, bilateral-negotiation, international-coordination, anthropic, DoD, correction-failure, transparency]
 processed_by: theseus
-processed_date: 2026-03-18
-enrichments_applied: ["government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them.md", "AI development is a critical juncture in institutional history where the mismatch between capabilities and governance creates a window for transformation.md"]
+processed_date: 2026-03-19
+enrichments_applied: ["government designation of safety-conscious AI labs as supply chain risks inverts the regulatory dynamic by penalizing safety constraints rather than enforcing them.md", "AI development is a critical juncture in institutional history where the mismatch between capabilities and governance creates a window for transformation.md", "voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints.md"]
 extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
 ---
 
diff --git a/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.json b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.json
index 874eb706..41a774c0 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.json
+++ b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-18-hks-governance-by-procurement-bilateral.json
@@ -13,12 +13,12 @@
     "fixed": 1,
     "rejected": 1,
     "fixes_applied": [
-      "bilateral-government-tech-negotiations-are-de-facto-ai-governance-bypassing-multilateral-frameworks.md:set_created:2026-03-18"
+      "bilateral-government-tech-negotiations-are-de-facto-ai-governance-bypassing-multilateral-frameworks.md:set_created:2026-03-19"
     ],
     "rejections": [
       "bilateral-government-tech-negotiations-are-de-facto-ai-governance-bypassing-multilateral-frameworks.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
     ]
   },
   "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
-  "date": "2026-03-18"
+  "date": "2026-03-19"
 }
\ No newline at end of file