auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #367
- Applied reviewer-requested changes - Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback) Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
fe29b8c0cb
commit
82f49c85fe
2 changed files with 36 additions and 51 deletions
|
|
@ -1,51 +0,0 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
description: "MetaDAO's founding engineer offer structures equity as fixed token allocation with market-cap-based unlocks, four-year cliff, and eight-month clawback period"
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
source: "MetaDAO proposal B82Dw1W6cfngH7BRukAyKXvXzP4T2cDsxwKYfxCftoC2, passed 2024-10-26"
|
||||
created: 2024-10-22
|
||||
secondary_domains: ["mechanisms"]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO's founding engineer compensation combines fixed token allocation, market-cap-triggered unlocks, four-year cliff, and clawback provisions
|
||||
|
||||
MetaDAO's October 2024 proposal to hire Advaith Sekharan as founding engineer demonstrates a novel compensation mechanism that extends beyond standard startup equity practices. The offer includes $180,000 annual salary plus 237 META tokens (1% of diluted supply including co-founder allocations), with vesting terms that create multiple commitment layers.
|
||||
|
||||
## Vesting Structure
|
||||
|
||||
**Market-cap-triggered unlocks**: Tokens unlock linearly based on META price rather than time. 100% unlocks at $5B market cap ($42,198 per META). A $500M market cap releases 10% of allocation (23.7 META). This ties compensation directly to project valuation rather than calendar time, creating performance-based incentives.
|
||||
|
||||
**Four-year cliff**: No tokens unlock before November 2028 regardless of market cap milestones. This creates a minimum four-year commitment period that extends beyond typical 4-year startup vesting schedules, signaling long-term founder commitment.
|
||||
|
||||
**Eight-month illiquid vest with clawback**: Until July 2025, the DAO retains clawback rights over all tokens. After that, tokens vest into a smart contract/multisig inaccessible to co-founders Nallok and Proph3t, creating graduated commitment with institutional safeguards.
|
||||
|
||||
## Mechanism Design Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
This structure attempts to address a known problem with time-based vesting: standard lockups are hedgeable through short-selling, making them ineffective alignment mechanisms. By tying unlocks to market price, the proposal creates non-hedgeable incentives—an engineer cannot neutralize the alignment by shorting META while appearing locked.
|
||||
|
||||
The four-year cliff combined with clawback provisions creates a two-stage commitment: immediate operational risk (clawback period) followed by long-term value alignment (price-based unlocks). This mirrors the co-founder allocation structure from prior MetaDAO proposal BgHv9GutbnsXZLZQHqPL8BbGWwtcaRDWx82aeRMNmJbG, suggesting potential template adoption.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
- Proposal B82Dw1W6cfngH7BRukAyKXvXzP4T2cDsxwKYfxCftoC2 (passed 2024-10-26): 237 META fixed allocation, linear unlocks at market cap milestones, no unlocks before November 2028, DAO clawback until July 2025
|
||||
- Market cap definition: $1B = $42,198 per META, with payouts based on per-token value not total market capitalization
|
||||
- Compensation mirrors co-founder allocation structure, indicating potential standardization
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
- Single implementation case limits generalizability to broader team compensation practices
|
||||
- Unlock criteria "decided at a later date" introduces execution uncertainty and potential future disputes
|
||||
- Long cliff and clawback period may deter candidates despite stated alignment benefits
|
||||
- No performance data yet on whether this structure improves retention or productivity vs traditional vesting
|
||||
- Illiquidity during clawback period creates financial risk for engineer if DAO faces insolvency
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Related mechanisms:
|
||||
- [[performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md]]
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md]]
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
claim_id: metadao_founding_engineer_compensation_price_triggered_vesting
|
||||
title: MetaDAO founding engineer compensation uses per-token price-triggered vesting with four-year cliff and clawback provisions
|
||||
description: MetaDAO's October 2024 proposal for hiring a founding engineer includes an experimental compensation structure where 23,706 META tokens unlock when the per-token price reaches $42,198 (representing approximately $1B total market cap at that price point), with a four-year minimum employment requirement and clawback provisions if the engineer leaves before four years. This structure differs from standard time-based vesting by tying unlocks to project success metrics (token price) rather than tenure alone, though the proposal contains some internal inconsistencies in describing the relationship between market cap and per-token price.
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
confidence: experimental
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- compensation
|
||||
- token-economics
|
||||
- vesting
|
||||
- metadao
|
||||
- crypto-governance
|
||||
created: 2025-01-29
|
||||
processed_date: 2025-01-29
|
||||
source: https://forum.metadao.fi/t/proposal-hire-advaith-sekharan-as-founding-engineer/191
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO founding engineer compensation uses per-token price-triggered vesting with four-year cliff and clawback provisions
|
||||
|
||||
In October 2024, MetaDAO proposed hiring a founding engineer with compensation structured around per-token price milestones rather than traditional time-based vesting. The proposal specifies that 23,706 META tokens unlock when the per-token price reaches $42,198, which at that token supply would represent approximately $1B in total market cap.
|
||||
|
||||
The structure includes:
|
||||
- **Price trigger**: Tokens unlock when META reaches $42,198 per token
|
||||
- **Four-year cliff**: Engineer must remain employed for minimum four years to retain tokens
|
||||
- **Clawback provisions**: Tokens are forfeited if engineer leaves before four-year mark
|
||||
- **Market cap context**: At the specified per-token price with 23,706 tokens, this represents roughly $1B market cap
|
||||
|
||||
The proposal argues this addresses limitations of standard lockups, which can be hedged through derivatives markets. By tying unlocks to token price performance, the structure attempts to align compensation with project success metrics.
|
||||
|
||||
**Note on internal inconsistencies**: The source proposal contains some conflation between market cap targets and per-token price targets. The unlock mechanism is based on per-token price ($42,198), not a direct market cap threshold, though the two are related through circulating supply.
|
||||
|
||||
## Related claims
|
||||
|
||||
- [[performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution]]
|
||||
- [[metadao-uses-futarchy-for-governance-decisions]]
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue