diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md b/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md
index 1bfca2653..1deb4b073 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/anprm-comment-volume-signals-bipartisan-political-pressure-on-cftc-rulemaking.md
@@ -58,3 +58,10 @@ Norton Rose Fulbright analysis reveals comment composition breakdown: 800+ total
 **Source:** Indian Gaming Association ANPRM comments, April 2026
 
 Tribal gaming coalition represents $40B+ annual industry with federal treaty protections and direct congressional access across both parties. IGA Chairman called CFTC preemption 'the largest threat in 30+ years of IGRA,' signaling maximum political mobilization.
+
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Yogonet 2026-04-20, IGA Chairman David Bean, CNIGA Chairman James Siva
+
+Tribal gaming operators filed ANPRM comments representing $40B+ annual revenue industry. Indian Gaming Association and California Nations Indian Gaming Association characterized CFTC preemption as existential threat to IGRA framework. Tribal gaming coalition has federal treaty protections and congressional access independent of state AG opposition, creating a second front of political pressure beyond state-level resistance.
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense.md b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense.md
index 532e18e45..0b50a10a7 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/cftc-multi-state-litigation-represents-qualitative-shift-from-regulatory-drafting-to-active-jurisdictional-defense.md
@@ -44,3 +44,10 @@ The Curtis-Schiff bill filed three weeks after Arizona criminal charges (March 1
 **Source:** Norton Rose Fulbright analysis, Selig House testimony April 17, 2026
 
 Selig April 17 House Agriculture Committee testimony: 'CFTC will no longer sit idly by while overzealous state governments undermine the agency's exclusive jurisdiction.' This is explicit offensive litigation posture, not defensive case-by-case response. Arizona filed first-ever criminal charges March 17, 2026; eleven states with enforcement actions. CFTC response is simultaneous multi-state suits, not negotiated settlements.
+
+
+## Extending Evidence
+
+**Source:** Yogonet 2026-04-20, tribal gaming ANPRM comments
+
+Tribal gaming opposition to CFTC preemption creates federal-versus-federal conflict (CFTC authority versus IGRA framework) rather than state-federal conflict. Tribes have distinct legal standing under federal law (IGRA) and congressional relationships that differ from state AG litigation strategy. This adds a second litigation pathway beyond state-level challenges.