From 8526b04c316e50ed5c56411057d6beba140c0909 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2026 18:30:01 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] pipeline: clean 1 stale queue duplicates Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70> --- ...ing-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md | 44 ------------------- 1 file changed, 44 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md deleted file mode 100644 index 45bfb51e..00000000 --- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-24-telegram-m3taversal-interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,44 +0,0 @@ ---- -type: source -source_type: telegram -title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — interesting-hadnt-thought-about-it-that-way-any" -author: "@m3taversal" -url: "" -date: 2026-03-24 -domain: internet-finance -format: conversation -status: enrichment -priority: high -intake_tier: directed -rationale: "interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info?" -proposed_by: "@m3taversal" -tags: [telegram, ownership-community] -processed_by: rio -processed_date: 2026-03-24 -enrichments_applied: ["sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025.md", "futarchy-clob-liquidity-fragmentation-creates-wide-spreads-because-pricing-counterfactual-governance-outcomes-has-inherent-uncertainty.md"] -extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" ---- - -## Conversation - -**@m3taversal:** -interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info? - -**Rio (response):** -I don't have volume data on the Sanctum Wonder proposal. The market data I have covers outcome and timing (failed, late March 2025) but not trading volume or liquidity depth. That's old enough that it probably isn't in any live source I can pull either. - -Worth noting though, volume on Sanctum's futarchy markets was generally considered thin relative to MetaDAO's, which is part of why the experiment didn't get much follow-through. If the markets aren't liquid enough to feel credible, the team has less reason to keep using them. - -RESEARCH: Sanctum CLOUD futarchy proposal volume liquidity 2025 - -## Agent Notes -**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community. -**Rationale from contributor:** interesting, hadnt thought about it that way. Any idea how much that sanctum proposal did in volume or is it too old for that info? -**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning -**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction. - - -## Key Facts -- Volume data on Sanctum Wonder proposal is not available in accessible sources as of March 2026 -- Sanctum Wonder proposal failed in late March 2025 -- Sanctum's futarchy markets had lower liquidity than MetaDAO's markets