teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 11 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 48

theseus: extract claims from 2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md

Browse source 
- Source: inbox/archive/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md
- Domain: ai-alignment
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4)

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-11 09:18:13 +00:00
parent 7e5ec353aa
commit 854ed2c11b
1 changed files with 13 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

14
inbox/archive/2025-08-00-oswald-arrowian-impossibility-machine-intelligence.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-08-07
domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [critical-systems]
format: paper
status: unprocessed
status: null-result
priority: high
tags: [arrows-theorem, machine-intelligence, impossibility, Legg-Hutter, Chollet-ARC, formal-proof]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2025-08-07
enrichments_applied: ["universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective.md", "designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Fourth independent impossibility tradition extending Arrow's theorem from preference aggregation to intelligence measurement. Strengthens convergent impossibility pattern. Full paper paywalled—proof technique not yet analyzed. Primary enrichment target is the universal alignment impossibility claim. Secondary enrichment adds fourth tradition to the nine-traditions convergence claim."
---
## Content
@ -41,3 +46,10 @@ No agent-environment-based MIM simultaneously satisfies analogs of Arrow's fairn
PRIMARY CONNECTION: universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective
WHY ARCHIVED: Fourth independent impossibility tradition — extends Arrow's theorem from alignment to intelligence measurement itself
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the extension from preference aggregation to intelligence measurement and what this means for alignment targets
## Key Facts
- Paper published in Springer LNCS vol. 16058 (AGI 2025 Conference proceedings)
- Authors: Oswald, J.T., Ferguson, T.M., & Bringsjord, S.
- Affected measures: Legg-Hutter Intelligence, Chollet's Intelligence Measure (ARC)
- Arrow conditions tested: Pareto Efficiency, Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives, Non-Oligarchy