diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/metadao-create-futardio.md b/entities/internet-finance/metadao-create-futardio.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..f0a68bc5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/entities/internet-finance/metadao-create-futardio.md
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
+---
+type: entity
+entity_type: decision_market
+name: "MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?"
+domain: internet-finance
+status: failed
+tracked_by: rio
+created: 2026-03-11
+last_updated: 2026-03-11
+parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
+platform: "futardio"
+proposer: "unknown"
+proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/zN9Uft1zEsh9h7Wspeg5bTNirBBvtBTaJ6i5KcEnbAb"
+proposal_date: 2024-11-21
+resolution_date: 2024-11-25
+category: strategy
+summary: "Minimal proposal to create Futardio — failed, likely due to lack of specification and justification"
+tags: ["futarchy", "futardio", "governance-filtering"]
+---
+
+# MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?
+
+## Summary
+A minimal one-sentence proposal: "Futardio is a great idea and needs to happen." Filed under the "Program" category. Failed within 4 days. No budget, no specification, no implementation plan. The proposer identity is not associated with core team members.
+
+## Market Data
+- **Outcome:** Failed (2024-11-25)
+- **Autocrat version:** 0.3
+- **Key participants:** Unknown proposer
+
+## Significance
+This failed proposal is more informative than many that passed. It demonstrates futarchy's quality filtering function — the market rejected an unsubstantiated proposal despite the concept (Futardio/permissionless launchpad) eventually being approved three months later with proper specification (see [[metadao-release-launchpad]]). The market distinguished between "good idea" and "well-specified proposal," rejecting the former and approving the latter.
+
+This is concrete evidence against the criticism that futarchy markets are easily manipulated or that token holders vote based on vibes rather than substance. The failure also shows that non-founder community members can propose, even if their proposals face higher scrutiny.
+
+Note: The later "Release a Launchpad" proposal (2025-02-26) by Proph3t and Kollan succeeded — same concept, dramatically better specification.
+
+## Relationship to KB
+- [[metadao]] — governance decision, quality filtering
+- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] — this proposal was too simple to pass
+- [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] — the market correctly filtered a low-quality proposal
+
+---
+
+Relevant Entities:
+- [[metadao]] — parent organization
+- [[futardio]] — the entity that was eventually created
+
+Topics:
+- [[internet finance and decision markets]]