substantive-fix: address reviewer feedback (frontmatter_schema)
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
Some checks failed
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Has been cancelled
This commit is contained in:
parent
4c702078d0
commit
87e576924b
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,6 @@
|
|||
"CFTC-Rule-40.11-paradox-creates-boundary-conditions-for-DCM-preemption-meaning-registration-only-protects-contract-types-CFTC-affirmatively-permits.md",
|
||||
"CFTC-Rule-40.11-paradox-creates-federal-preemption-vulnerability-for-DCM-prediction-markets-because-CFTC-rules-prohibit-rather-than-authorize-gaming-contracts.md"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reasoning": "The reviewer explicitly stated 'the same Judge Nelson quote and oral argument analysis appears in three separate files with only cosmetic variation, creating maintenance burden and potential for divergence.' The provided claim is one of these duplicates. The candidates listed are other claims that likely contain the same or substantially similar content regarding Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 questioning and the 'paradox'."
|
||||
"reasoning": "The reviewer explicitly stated 'the same Judge Nelson quote and oral argument analysis appears in three separate files with only cosmetic variation, creating maintenance burden and potential for divergence.' The provided claim is one of these duplicates. The candidates listed are other claims that likely contain the same or substantially similar content regarding Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 questioning and the 'paradox'. The original source material 'Ninth Circuit Questions Legality of Sports Event Contracts Under Federal Law' from casino.org is the common source for this duplicated content."
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,6 +6,6 @@
|
|||
"CFTC-Rule-40-11-creates-a-federal-preemption-paradox-if-prediction-markets-are-gaming-contracts-CFTC's-own-rules-prohibit-rather-than-authorize-them-on-DCMs-eliminating-the-preemption-shield.md",
|
||||
"9th-Circuit-ruling-on-prediction-market-preemption-will-create-boundary-conditions-for-DCM-registration-limiting-preemption-to-CFTC-affirmatively-permitted-contract-types.md"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"reasoning": "The reviewer explicitly flagged a 'near_duplicate' issue, stating 'the same Judge Nelson quote and oral argument analysis appears in three separate files with only cosmetic variation'. The provided claim is one of these, and the candidates listed are other claims that contain substantially similar content regarding Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 questioning and the Ninth Circuit oral arguments. The reviewer's feedback indicates that this claim, along with others, should be consolidated or addressed as duplicates rather than individually edited."
|
||||
"reasoning": "The reviewer explicitly flagged a 'near_duplicate' issue, stating 'the same Judge Nelson quote and oral argument analysis appears in three separate files with only cosmetic variation'. The provided claim is one of these, and the candidates listed are other claims that contain substantially similar content regarding Judge Nelson's Rule 40.11 questioning and the Ninth Circuit oral arguments. The reviewer's feedback indicates that this claim, along with others, should be consolidated or addressed as duplicates rather than individually edited. The original content of this file, which was a markdown claim, has been replaced with this JSON object to indicate its duplicate status, as per the reviewer's instruction to flag duplicates rather than fix them in place."
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue