From 89dc334252682894973b96b6485a09a216b60c2b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2026 12:45:38 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] auto-fix: strip 2 broken wiki links Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base. --- ...passive-provision-profitable-and-active-trading-expensive.md | 2 +- ...bscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/high-fee-amms-create-lp-incentive-and-manipulation-deterrent-simultaneously-by-making-passive-provision-profitable-and-active-trading-expensive.md b/domains/internet-finance/high-fee-amms-create-lp-incentive-and-manipulation-deterrent-simultaneously-by-making-passive-provision-profitable-and-active-trading-expensive.md index f3fc2341b..577eabecf 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/high-fee-amms-create-lp-incentive-and-manipulation-deterrent-simultaneously-by-making-passive-provision-profitable-and-active-trading-expensive.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/high-fee-amms-create-lp-incentive-and-manipulation-deterrent-simultaneously-by-making-passive-provision-profitable-and-active-trading-expensive.md @@ -9,5 +9,5 @@ description: P2P.me's 50% liquid float at TGE replicates FairScale's structural --- P2P.me's 50% liquid float at TGE replicates FairScale's structural risk. Pine Analytics identifies this as concerning given the FairScale implicit put option pattern. This structural risk from a large initial float operates independently of AMM fee structures. While high AMM fees may deter manipulation within the AMM, they do not mitigate liquidation risk stemming from a large initial float relative to committed long-term holders. This suggests that AMM manipulation deterrence and initial float concentration are orthogonal risks requiring separate mitigations. -[[ownership-coins-primary-value-proposition-is-investor-protection-not-governance-quality]] +ownership-coins-primary-value-proposition-is-investor-protection-not-governance-quality ``` \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md index 91e904d86..1f85abaf7 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md @@ -2,5 +2,5 @@ ### Additional Evidence (extend) *Source: [[2026-03-19-pineanalytics-p2p-metadao-ico-analysis]] | Added: 2026-03-23* -P2P.me ICO targeting $6M at $15.5M FDV represents a stretched valuation case (182x gross profit multiple) that tests whether MetaDAO's futarchy governance can correctly filter overpriced projects. Pine Analytics identifies fundamental concerns: $82K annual gross profit, plateaued user growth since mid-2025, and 50% liquid float at TGE replicating FairScale's structural liquidation risk. The outcome (pass/fail) will indicate whether community judgment overrides analyst signals based on growth optionality and tier-1 backing (Multicoin, Coinbase Ventures), or whether futarchy markets enforce valuation discipline. This outcome will also provide further evidence for the claim that [[ownership-coins-primary-value-proposition-is-investor-protection-not-governance-quality]]. +P2P.me ICO targeting $6M at $15.5M FDV represents a stretched valuation case (182x gross profit multiple) that tests whether MetaDAO's futarchy governance can correctly filter overpriced projects. Pine Analytics identifies fundamental concerns: $82K annual gross profit, plateaued user growth since mid-2025, and 50% liquid float at TGE replicating FairScale's structural liquidation risk. The outcome (pass/fail) will indicate whether community judgment overrides analyst signals based on growth optionality and tier-1 backing (Multicoin, Coinbase Ventures), or whether futarchy markets enforce valuation discipline. This outcome will also provide further evidence for the claim that ownership-coins-primary-value-proposition-is-investor-protection-not-governance-quality. ``` \ No newline at end of file