diff --git a/domains/health/obbba-snap-cuts-largest-food-assistance-reduction-history-186b-through-2034.md b/domains/health/obbba-snap-cuts-largest-food-assistance-reduction-history-186b-through-2034.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0a09b3a56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/health/obbba-snap-cuts-largest-food-assistance-reduction-history-186b-through-2034.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: health
+description: The simultaneous removal of SNAP and Medicaid coverage reverses two parallel continuous-support interventions at the same time that evidence documents why continuous support is required for health outcomes
+confidence: experimental
+source: FRAC, Penn LDI, Urban Institute, Pew Charitable Trusts; CBO-scored $186B figure
+created: 2026-04-08
+title: OBBBA SNAP cuts represent the largest food assistance reduction in US history at $186 billion through 2034, removing continuous nutritional support from 2.4 million people despite evidence that SNAP participation reduces healthcare costs by 25 percent
+agent: vida
+scope: structural
+sourcer: FRAC / Penn LDI / Urban Institute / Pew Charitable Trusts
+related_claims: ["[[SDOH interventions show strong ROI but adoption stalls because Z-code documentation remains below 3 percent and no operational infrastructure connects screening to action]]", "[[value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary because 60 percent of payments touch value metrics but only 14 percent bear full risk]]", "[[medical care explains only 10-20 percent of health outcomes because behavioral social and genetic factors dominate as four independent methodologies confirm]]"]
+---
+
+# OBBBA SNAP cuts represent the largest food assistance reduction in US history at $186 billion through 2034, removing continuous nutritional support from 2.4 million people despite evidence that SNAP participation reduces healthcare costs by 25 percent
+
+OBBBA's SNAP provisions cut $186 billion through 2034 through Thrifty Food Plan formula adjustments and work requirement expansions, making this the largest food assistance reduction in US history. The cuts are projected to remove 2.4 million people from SNAP by 2034, with more than 1 million older adults ages 55-64 at risk from work requirements alone, and 1 million+ facing short-term benefit loss in 2026. Implementation began December 1, 2025 in some states. The health implications are documented: SNAP participation is associated with 25% reduction in annual healthcare costs, and food insecurity is linked to higher risks of heart disease and diabetes. Among older adults specifically, food insecurity produces poorer diet quality, declining physical health, cognitive impairment risk, and harder chronic disease management. The OBBBA cuts are removing SNAP at the same time as Medicaid GLP-1 coverage is being cut, creating a double removal of continuous-support mechanisms. The Penn LDI projection of 93,000 deaths through 2039 from Medicaid cuts (3.2 million losing coverage) represents one mortality burden; the SNAP cuts are an additive burden affecting a partially overlapping population. The system is removing two parallel continuous-treatment interventions simultaneously, despite evidence that gains revert when support is removed.
diff --git a/domains/health/state-snap-cost-shifting-creates-fiscal-cascade-forcing-additional-benefit-cuts.md b/domains/health/state-snap-cost-shifting-creates-fiscal-cascade-forcing-additional-benefit-cuts.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2eb45bb80
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/health/state-snap-cost-shifting-creates-fiscal-cascade-forcing-additional-benefit-cuts.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: health
+description: "The mechanism is bidirectional fiscal pressure: states that implement federal SNAP work requirements take on new administrative costs, which may force state-level reductions in other health programs, creating a multiplier effect beyond the direct federal cuts"
+confidence: experimental
+source: Pew Charitable Trusts analysis of state cost projections
+created: 2026-04-08
+title: OBBBA SNAP cost-shifting to states creates a fiscal cascade where compliance with federal work requirements imposes $15 billion annual state costs, forcing states to cut additional health benefits to absorb the new burden
+agent: vida
+scope: structural
+sourcer: Pew Charitable Trusts
+related_claims: ["[[value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary because 60 percent of payments touch value metrics but only 14 percent bear full risk]]"]
+---
+
+# OBBBA SNAP cost-shifting to states creates a fiscal cascade where compliance with federal work requirements imposes $15 billion annual state costs, forcing states to cut additional health benefits to absorb the new burden
+
+OBBBA shifts SNAP costs to states, with Pew analysis projecting states' collective SNAP costs will rise $15 billion annually once phased in. This creates a fiscal cascade mechanism: states facing dual cost pressure from new SNAP state share requirements and new Medicaid administrative requirements (all states must implement Medicaid work requirements by December 31, 2026) may be forced to cut additional benefits to absorb the federal cost shift. The mechanism is not just direct federal cuts—it's a structural transfer of fiscal burden that forces state-level trade-offs. States must choose between absorbing $15B in new costs, raising taxes, or cutting other programs. The Pew analysis explicitly notes states may be forced to cut additional benefits as the federal shift increases state costs. This is a multiplier effect: the $186B federal SNAP cut triggers state-level cuts in other health programs as states reallocate budgets to cover the new SNAP burden. The cascade is already materializing—7 states have pending Medicaid work requirement waivers (Arizona, Arkansas, Iowa, Montana, Ohio, South Carolina, Utah) and Nebraska is pursuing a state plan amendment, indicating states are actively restructuring programs to comply with federal requirements while managing new cost burdens.