From 8a8a717825aa99acf0a3d934d9c038ee15db79ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: m3taversal Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2026 12:01:13 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] =?UTF-8?q?leo:=2010=20architecture-as-claims=20=E2=80=94?= =?UTF-8?q?=20documenting=20how=20the=20Teleo=20collective=20works?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit - What: 10 new claims in core/living-agents/ documenting the operational methodology of the Teleo collective as falsifiable claims, not instructions - Why: The repo should document itself using its own format. Each claim grounds in evidence from 43 merged PRs, clearly separates what works today from what's planned, and identifies immediate improvements. - Claims cover: PR review, prose-as-title, wiki-link graphs, domain specialization, confidence calibration, source archiving, git trailers, human-in-the-loop governance, musings, atomic notes - This is Leo proposing about core/ — requires 2 domain agent reviews + Rhea Pentagon-Agent: Leo <76FB9BCA-CC16-4479-B3E5-25A3769B3D7E> Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 --- core/living-agents/_map.md | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+) diff --git a/core/living-agents/_map.md b/core/living-agents/_map.md index 6347976..e8794ab 100644 --- a/core/living-agents/_map.md +++ b/core/living-agents/_map.md @@ -23,6 +23,18 @@ The architecture follows biological organization: nested Markov blankets with sp - [[collaborative knowledge infrastructure requires separating the versioning problem from the knowledge evolution problem because git solves file history but not semantic disagreement or insight-level attribution]] — the design challenge - [[person-adapted AI compounds knowledge about individuals while idea-learning AI compounds knowledge about domains and the architectural gap between them is where collective intelligence lives]] — where CI lives +## Operational Architecture (how the Teleo collective works today) +- [[adversarial PR review produces higher quality knowledge than self-review because separated proposer and evaluator roles catch errors that the originating agent cannot see]] — the core quality mechanism +- [[prose-as-title forces claim specificity because a proposition that cannot be stated as a disagreeable sentence is not a real claim]] — the simplest quality gate +- [[wiki-link graphs create auditable reasoning chains because every belief must cite claims and every position must cite beliefs making the path from evidence to conclusion traversable]] — the reasoning graph +- [[domain specialization with cross-domain synthesis produces better collective intelligence than generalist agents because specialists build deeper knowledge while a dedicated synthesizer finds connections they cannot see from within their territory]] — why specialization + synthesis beats generalism +- [[confidence calibration with four levels enforces honest uncertainty because proven requires strong evidence while speculative explicitly signals theoretical status]] — honest uncertainty +- [[source archiving with extraction provenance creates a complete audit trail from raw input to knowledge base output because every source records what was extracted and by whom]] — provenance tracking +- [[git trailers on a shared account solve multi-agent attribution because Pentagon-Agent headers in commit objects survive platform migration while GitHub-specific metadata does not]] — agent attribution +- [[human-in-the-loop at the architectural level means humans set direction and approve structure while agents handle extraction synthesis and routine evaluation]] — governance hierarchy +- [[musings as pre-claim exploratory space let agents develop ideas without quality gate pressure because seeds that never mature are information not waste]] — exploratory layer +- [[atomic notes with one claim per file enable independent evaluation and granular linking because bundled claims force reviewers to accept or reject unrelated propositions together]] — atomic structure + ## Ownership & Attribution - [[ownership alignment turns network effects from extractive to generative]] — the ownership insight - [[living agents transform knowledge sharing from a cost center into an ownership-generating asset]] — why people contribute