auto-fix: strip 3 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

agents/leo/musings/research-2026-03-20.md

@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ And the observability gap (Finding 1) is the underlying mechanism for why Layer
 CLAIM CANDIDATE: "AI governance faces a four-layer failure structure where each successive mode of governance (voluntary commitment → legal mandate → compulsory evaluation → regulatory durability) encounters a distinct structural barrier, with the observability gap — AI's lack of physically observable capability signatures — being the root constraint that prevents Layer 3 from being fixed regardless of political will or legal mandate."
 - Confidence: experimental
 - Domain: grand-strategy (cross-domain synthesis — spans AI-alignment technical findings and governance institutional design)
-- Related: [[technology advances exponentially but coordination mechanisms evolve linearly]], [[voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure]], the structural irony claim (candidate from 2026-03-19), nuclear analogy observability gap (new claim candidate)
+- Related: technology advances exponentially but coordination mechanisms evolve linearly, voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure, the structural irony claim (candidate from 2026-03-19), nuclear analogy observability gap (new claim candidate)
 - Boundary: "AI governance" refers to safety/alignment oversight of frontier AI systems. The four-layer structure may apply to other dual-use technologies with low observability (synthetic biology) but this claim is scoped to AI.
 
 ---

inbox/queue/2026-03-20-leo-nuclear-ai-governance-observability-gap.md

@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ The nuclear timeline (~23 years from Hiroshima to NPT) is often cited as evidenc
 - [[technology advances exponentially but coordination mechanisms evolve linearly creating a widening gap]] — observability gap adds a new mechanism for why this widening is structural, not just temporary
 - Bench2cop: zero coverage of oversight evasion capabilities — the specific evidence for the observability gap
 - EU AI Act Article 92: compulsory evaluation powers exist but can't inspect what matters
-- [[nuclear near-misses prove that even low annual extinction probability compounds to near-certainty over millennia]] — nuclear governance (imperfect but real) provides partial mitigation of this risk; AI governance lacking equivalent observability provides much weaker mitigation
+- nuclear near-misses prove that even low annual extinction probability compounds to near-certainty over millennia — nuclear governance (imperfect but real) provides partial mitigation of this risk; AI governance lacking equivalent observability provides much weaker mitigation
 
 **Extraction hints:**