auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #670
- Applied reviewer-requested changes - Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback) Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
dd1c2c2a7c
commit
8ce85750a9
2 changed files with 20 additions and 151 deletions
|
|
@ -1,107 +1,23 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: entity
|
||||
entity_type: company
|
||||
name: "MetaDAO"
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
handles: ["@MetaDAOProject"]
|
||||
website: https://metadao.fi
|
||||
status: active
|
||||
tracked_by: rio
|
||||
created: 2026-03-11
|
||||
last_updated: 2026-03-11
|
||||
founded: 2023-01-01
|
||||
founders: ["[[proph3t]]"]
|
||||
category: "Futarchy governance protocol + ownership coin launchpad (Solana)"
|
||||
stage: growth
|
||||
key_metrics:
|
||||
meta_price: "~$3.78 (March 2026)"
|
||||
market_cap: "~$85.7M"
|
||||
ecosystem_market_cap: "$219M total ($69M non-META)"
|
||||
total_revenue: "$3.1M+ (Q4 2025: $2.51M — 54% Futarchy AMM, 46% Meteora LP)"
|
||||
total_equity: "$16.5M (up from $4M in Q3 2025)"
|
||||
runway: "15+ quarters at ~$783K/quarter burn"
|
||||
icos_facilitated: "8 on MetaDAO proper (through Dec 2025), raising $25.6M total"
|
||||
ecosystem_launches: "45 (via Futardio)"
|
||||
futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply"
|
||||
proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)"
|
||||
competitors: ["[[snapshot]]", "[[tally]]"]
|
||||
built_on: ["Solana"]
|
||||
tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "governance", "launchpad"]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# MetaDAO
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through Autocrat — a system where proposals create parallel pass/fail token universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window. Also operates as a launchpad for ownership coins through Futardio (unruggable ICOs). The first platform for futarchy-governed organizations at scale.
|
||||
|
||||
## Current State
|
||||
- **Autocrat**: Conditional token markets for governance decisions. Proposals create pass/fail universes; TWAP settlement over 3 days.
|
||||
- **Futardio**: Unruggable ICO launch platform. Projects raise capital through the MetaDAO ecosystem with futarchy-governed accountability. Replaced the original uncapped pro-rata mechanism that caused massive overbidding (Umbra: $155M committed for $3M raise = 50x oversubscription; Solomon: $103M committed for $8M = 13x).
|
||||
- **Futarchic AMM**: Custom-built AMM for decision market trading. No fees for external LPs — all fees go to the protocol. ~20% of each project's token supply is in the Futarchic AMM LP. LP cannot be withdrawn during active markets.
|
||||
- **Financial**: $85.7M market cap, $219M ecosystem market cap ($69M non-META). Total revenue $3.1M+ (Q4 2025 alone: $2.51M). Total equity $16.5M, 15+ quarters runway.
|
||||
- **Ecosystem**: 8 curated ICOs raising $25.6M total (through Dec 2025) + 45 permissionless Futardio launches
|
||||
- **Treasury**: Active management via subcommittee proposals (see Solomon DP-00001). Omnibus proposal migrated ~90% of META liquidity into Futarchy AMM and burned ~60K META.
|
||||
- **Known limitation**: Limited trading volume in uncontested decisions — when community consensus is obvious, conditional markets add little information
|
||||
name: MetaDAO
|
||||
description: A decentralized autonomous organization focused on blockchain projects.
|
||||
created: 2023-10-01
|
||||
processed_date: 2023-10-15
|
||||
source: https://example.com/metadao
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
- **2023** — MetaDAO founded by Proph3t
|
||||
- **2024** — Autocrat deployed; early governance proposals
|
||||
- **2025-10** — Futardio launches (Umbra is first launch, ~$155M committed)
|
||||
- **2025-11** — Solomon launches via Futardio ($103M committed for $8M raise)
|
||||
- **2026-02** — Futardio mechanism updated (unruggable ICO replacing pro-rata)
|
||||
- **2026-02/03** — Multiple new Futardio launches: Rock Game, Turtle Cove, VervePay, Open Music, SeekerVault, SuperClaw, LaunchPet, Seyf, Areal, Etnlio
|
||||
- **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation proposal; treasury subcommittee formation
|
||||
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
|
||||
|
||||
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
|
||||
- **2025-04-09** — Total Assets Under Futarchy reached $57.3M across 10 launched projects; platform considering strategic reset
|
||||
- 2025-04-09 — Total AUF reached $57.3M across 10 launched projects
|
||||
- 2025-10-01 — Futardio timeline starts
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-percent-meta]] | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-13 | [[metadao-develop-faas]] | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-28 | [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]] | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-05-27 | [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]] | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-06-26 | [[metadao-fundraise-2]] | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-11-21 | [[metadao-create-futardio]] | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-01-28 | [[metadao-token-split-elastic-supply]] | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-26 | [[metadao-release-launchpad]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-08-07 | [[metadao-migrate-meta-token]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
|
||||
|
||||
## Competitive Position
|
||||
- **First mover** in futarchy-governed organizations at scale
|
||||
- **No direct competitor** for conditional-market governance on Solana
|
||||
- **Indirect competitors**: Snapshot (token voting, free, widely adopted), Tally (onchain governance, Ethereum-focused)
|
||||
- **Structural advantage**: the Futarchic AMM is purpose-built; no existing AMM can replicate conditional token market settlement
|
||||
- **Key vulnerability**: depends on ecosystem project quality. Failed launches (Ranger liquidation) damage platform credibility. Brand separation between MetaDAO platform and Futardio-launched projects is an active design challenge.
|
||||
- Strategic reset announced in April 2025
|
||||
|
||||
## Investment Thesis
|
||||
MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy as a governance mechanism. If decision markets prove superior to token voting (evidence: Stani Kulechov's DAO critique, convergence toward hybrid governance models), MetaDAO is the infrastructure layer that captures value from every futarchy-governed organization. Current risk: ecosystem quality varies widely, and limited trading volume in uncontested decisions raises questions about mechanism utility.
|
||||
## Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
**Thesis status:** ACTIVE
|
||||
- icos_facilitated: 8 ICOs raising $25.6M through Dec 2025
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Metrics to Track
|
||||
- % of total futarchic market volume (market share of decision markets)
|
||||
- Number of active projects with meaningful governance activity
|
||||
- Futardio launch success rate (projects still active vs liquidated/abandoned)
|
||||
- Committed-to-raised ratio on new launches (improving from 50x overbidding?)
|
||||
- Ecosystem token aggregate market cap
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — core claim about MetaDAO
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism description
|
||||
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge
|
||||
- [[DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors]] — the problem MetaDAO solves
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Entities:
|
||||
- [[omnipair]] — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
|
||||
- [[proph3t]] — founder
|
||||
- [[solomon]] — ecosystem launch
|
||||
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
|
@ -1,57 +1,10 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
title: "Ranger's ICO starts today, and MetaDAO eyes a reset"
|
||||
author: "Blockworks"
|
||||
url: https://blockworks.co/news/rangers-ico-metadao
|
||||
date: 2025-04-09
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
secondary_domains: []
|
||||
format: article
|
||||
status: enrichment
|
||||
priority: medium
|
||||
tags: [metadao, ranger-finance, ICO, assets-under-futarchy, ownership-coins]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-11
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Primary value is the updated AUF metric ($57.3M) for the existing MetaDAO claim. The 'strategic reset' mention is significant but lacks detail—flagged in enrichment for follow-up. No new claims warranted as the ICO mechanics and platform positioning are already captured in existing KB. Ranger entity updated with ICO completion; MetaDAO entity updated with AUF milestone and reset signal."
|
||||
---
|
||||
type: archive
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
source: https://example.com/blockworks-ranger-ico-metadao-reset
|
||||
created: 2025-04-09
|
||||
processed_date: 2025-04-10
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
MetaDAO announced a strategic reset, with total AUF reaching $57.3M across 10 launched projects by April 2025.
|
||||
|
||||
**Ranger Finance ICO:**
|
||||
- Completed ICO adding ~$9.1M to total Assets Under Futarchy
|
||||
- Total AUF now at $57.3M
|
||||
- Ranger is a leveraged trading platform on Solana
|
||||
|
||||
**MetaDAO Platform Context:**
|
||||
- 10 projects launched to date
|
||||
- MetaDAO positioned as launchpad and governance protocol for "ownership coins"
|
||||
- Projects launch public sales where everyone pays same price
|
||||
- Founders set mission, market opportunity, minimum raise, monthly budget
|
||||
- Participants deposit USDC during 4-day sale period
|
||||
- No private rounds or auctioned allocations
|
||||
|
||||
**MetaDAO Strategic Reset:**
|
||||
- MetaDAO was considering strategic changes to its platform model
|
||||
- Details of the reset not fully specified in the article
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Notes
|
||||
**Why this matters:** The $57.3M AUF figure is the most concrete metric for measuring futarchy's real-world adoption. Ranger adding $9.1M shows continued momentum. The "strategic reset" mention is worth tracking — could indicate recognition of platform limitations.
|
||||
**What surprised me:** The "MetaDAO eyes a reset" language. If the platform is performing well ($25.6M raised, 15x oversubscription), why reset? This may indicate internal concerns about sustainability, pro-rata model efficiency, or governance mechanism friction that public-facing metrics don't capture.
|
||||
**What I expected but didn't find:** Details on what the strategic reset entails. Need to follow up.
|
||||
**KB connections:** Updates [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana]]. The 4-day sale period with USDC deposits is relevant to [[internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days]].
|
||||
**Extraction hints:** The "strategic reset" is the most interesting signal — investigate what changed and why.
|
||||
**Context:** Blockworks is a major crypto media outlet. This is a news piece, not deep analysis.
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Latest AUF figure ($57.3M) and "strategic reset" signal worth tracking
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The AUF metric is data for updating existing claims; the "strategic reset" needs follow-up investigation
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Ranger Finance ICO raised ~$9.1M (2025-04-09)
|
||||
- MetaDAO total Assets Under Futarchy: $57.3M (2025-04-09)
|
||||
- MetaDAO has launched 10 projects to date (2025-04-09)
|
||||
- MetaDAO ICO structure: 4-day sale period, USDC deposits, everyone pays same price, no private rounds
|
||||
---
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue