teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 11 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

auto-fix: strip 2 broken wiki links

Browse source 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-16 13:07:22 +00:00
parent b7b8e41375
commit 8d54598eb6
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
inbox/archive/2026-02-11-china-long-march-10-sea-landing.md
View file

@ -34,12 +34,12 @@ China is also building a 25,000-ton, 472-foot rocket-catching ship "Ling Hang Zh
**Why this matters:** The KB claim that China is "closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years" is already outdated. China demonstrated controlled first-stage sea landing in Feb 2026 and is launching a reusable variant in April 2026. The gap closed in ~2 years, not 5-8.
**What surprised me:** The tethered wire / cable-net recovery approach. This is a genuinely different engineering solution — not copying SpaceX. China is innovating on the recovery method, not just catching up.
**What I expected but didn't find:** Detailed cost projections for reusable Chinese launch. Also missing: how many reflights they're targeting per booster.
**KB connections:** [[China is the only credible peer competitor in space with comprehensive capabilities and state-directed acceleration closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years]]
**KB connections:** China is the only credible peer competitor in space with comprehensive capabilities and state-directed acceleration closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years
**Extraction hints:** The "5-8 years" timeframe in the KB claim needs revision — evidence now shows 1-2 years. The cable-net recovery approach as evidence of independent innovation, not just technology copying. State-directed acceleration as a different competitive model than market-driven (SpaceX) or patient-capital (Blue Origin).
**Context:** China's space program operates under state direction with strategic competition motivation. The speed of their reusability development suggests the 5-8 year estimate was significantly wrong — possibly because it underweighted state-directed industrial policy.
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[China is the only credible peer competitor in space with comprehensive capabilities and state-directed acceleration closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years]]
PRIMARY CONNECTION: China is the only credible peer competitor in space with comprehensive capabilities and state-directed acceleration closing the reusability gap in 5-8 years
WHY ARCHIVED: Directly challenges the "5-8 year" timeline — China achieved first stage recovery in early 2026, with reusable variant launching April 2026
EXTRACTION HINT: The claim needs timeline revision. Also extract the cable-net recovery approach as evidence of independent innovation trajectory.